Korean J Radiol.  2019 Aug;20(8):1300-1310. 10.3348/kjr.2019.0189.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Lung Biopsies: A Multicenter Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 2Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Radiology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Radiology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea.
  • 8Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 9Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cmpark.morphius@gmail.com
  • 10Department of Statistics, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
  • 11Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To measure the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous transthoracic needle lung biopsies (PTNBs) on the basis of the intention-to-diagnose principle and identify risk factors for diagnostic failure of PTNBs in a multi-institutional setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 9384 initial PTNBs performed in 9239 patients (mean patient age, 65 years [range, 20-99 years]) from January 2010 to December 2014 were included. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PTNBs for diagnosis of malignancy were measured. The proportion of diagnostic failures was measured, and their risk factors were identified.
RESULTS
The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.6-91.7%), 92.5% (95% CI, 91.9-93.1%), 86.5% (95% CI, 85.0-87.9%), 99.2% (95% CI, 99.0-99.4%), and 84.3% (95% CI, 82.7-85.8%), respectively. The proportion of diagnostic failures was 8.9% (831 of 9384; 95% CI, 8.3-9.4%). The independent risk factors for diagnostic failures were lesions ≤ 1 cm in size (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.23-2.81), lesion size 1.1-2 cm (1.75; 1.45-2.11), subsolid lesions (1.81; 1.32-2.49), use of fine needle aspiration only (2.43; 1.80-3.28), final diagnosis of benign lesions (2.18; 1.84-2.58), and final diagnosis of lymphomas (10.66; 6.21-18.30). Use of cone-beam CT (AOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.75) and conventional CT-guidance (0.55; 0.32-0.94) reduced diagnostic failures.
CONCLUSION
The accuracy of PTNB for diagnosis of malignancy was fairly high in our large-scale multi-institutional cohort. The identified risk factors for diagnostic failure may help reduce diagnostic failure and interpret the biopsy results.

Keyword

Image-guided biopsy; Sensitivity and specificity; Lung neoplasms; Multicenter study

MeSH Terms

Biopsy*
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Cohort Studies
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Diagnosis
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy
Lung Neoplasms
Lung*
Lymphoma
Needles*
Odds Ratio
Risk Factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
    DB Error: unknown error