Korean J Pain.  2019 Apr;32(2):113-119. 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.2.113.

Efficacy of transforaminal laser annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Wooridul Spine Hospital, Daegu, Korea. magary1@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Woridul Spine Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Chungdam Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Discogenic pain is a common cause of disability and is assumed to be a major cause of non-specific low back pain. Various treatment methods have been used for the treatment of discogenic pain. This study was conducted to compare the therapeutic success of radiofrequency (an intradiscal procedure) and laser annuloplasty (both an intradiscal and extradiscal procedure).
METHODS
This single-center study included 80 patients and followed them for 6 months. Transforaminal laser annuloplasty (TFLA, 37 patients) or intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty (IDRA, 43 patients) was performed. The main outcomes included pain scores, determined by the numeric rating scale (NRS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI), at pre-treatment and at post-treatment months 1 and 6.
RESULTS
The patients were grouped according to procedure. In all procedures, NRS and ODI scores were significantly decreased over time. Mean post-treatment pain scores at months 1 and 6 were significantly lower (P < 0.01) in both groups, and between-group differences were not significant. The ODI score was also significantly decreased compared with baseline. Among patients undergoing TFLA, 70.3% (n = 26) reported pain relief (NRS scores < 50% of baseline) at post-treatment 6 months, vs. 58.1% (n = 25) of those undergoing IDRA. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in ODI reduction of > 40%.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that annuloplasty is a reasonable treatment option for carefully selected patients with lower back and radicular pain of discogenic origin, and TFLA might be superior to IDRA in patients with discogenic low back pain.

Keyword

Annulus fibrosus; Case-control studies; Clinical trials; Disability evaluation; Intervertebral disc; Lasers; Low back pain; Pain management; Pain measurement; Radiofrequency ablation

MeSH Terms

Case-Control Studies
Catheter Ablation
Disability Evaluation
Humans
Intervertebral Disc
Low Back Pain*
Pain Management
Pain Measurement

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Oblique view of the 15-gauge spinal needle insertion. The needle was inserted at the identified entry point and directed lateral to the superior articular pillar toward the target lesion.

  • Fig. 2 Spinal needle placement in the anterior epidural space. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographic views.

  • Fig. 3 Forceps removal and laser ablation of interposed granulation or nucleus pulposus were performed through the annular puncture. (A) Anteroposterior and (B) lateral radiographic views.

  • Fig. 4 Representative discogram before intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty.

  • Fig. 5 (A) Granulation tissue was removed with small disc forceps and (B) ablated with the steerable radiofrequency Trigger-Flex® probe.


Cited by  2 articles

Questions and comments on the efficacy of transforaminal laser annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain
Daehyun Jo
Korean J Pain. 2019;32(4):313-314.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.313.

Author’s reply
Chan Hong Park
Korean J Pain. 2019;32(4):314-315.    doi: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.4.314.


Reference

1. Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N. The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20:1878–83. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199509000-00007.
Article
2. Peng BG, Wu WW, Hou SX, Zhang CL, Yang Y, Wang XH, et al. The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. Chin J Surg. 2004; 42:720–4.
Article
3. Freemont AJ, Peacock TE, Goupille P, Hoyland JA, O’Brien J, Jayson MI. Nerve ingrowth into diseased intervertebral disc in chronic back pain. Lancet. 1997; 350:178–81. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02135-1. PMID: 9250186.
Article
4. Peng B, Wu W, Hou S, Li P, Zhang C, Yang Y. The pathogenesis of discogenic low back pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:62–7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B1.15708. PMID: 15686239.
Article
5. Peng B, Hao J, Hou S, Wu W, Jiang D, Fu X, et al. Possible pathogenesis of painful intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31:560–6. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201324.45537.46.
Article
6. Barendse GA, van Den Berg SG, Kessels AH, Weber WE, van Kleef M. Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for chronic discogenic back pain: lack of effect from a 90-second 70 C lesion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26:287–92. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00014.
7. Kapural L, Hayek S, Malak O, Arrigain S, Mekhail N. Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of discogenic pain: a prospective matched control trial. Pain Med. 2005; 6:425–31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2005.00073.x. PMID: 16336479.
Article
8. Oh WS, Shim JC. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency denervation of the ramus communicans nerve for chronic discogenic low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2004; 20:55–60. DOI: 10.1097/00002508-200401000-00011.
Article
9. Nachemson A, Zdeblick TA, O’Brien JP. Lumbar disc disease with discogenic pain. What surgical treatment is most effective? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21:1835–8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199608010-00023.
10. Zhou Y, Abdi S. Diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of lumbar discogenic pain--a review of the literature. Clin J Pain. 2006; 22:468–81. DOI: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000208244.33498.05. PMID: 16772802.
11. Khot A, Bowditch M, Powell J, Sharp D. The use of intradiscal steroid therapy for lumbar spinal discogenic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29:833–6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00002.
12. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical efficacy and its prognostic factor of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar annuloplasty and nucleoplasty for the treatment of patients with discogenic low back pain. World Neurosurg. 2017; 105:832–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.112. PMID: 28648909.
Article
13. Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar annuloplasty and nucleoplasty for treatment of patients with discogenic low back pain. Pain Med. 2016; 17:650–7. PMID: 26893114.
Article
14. Lee SH, Kang HS. Percutaneous endoscopic laser annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. World Neurosurg. 2010; 73:198–206. DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.01.023. PMID: 20860958.
Article
15. Kumar N, Kumar A, Siddharth MS, Sambhav PS, Tan J. Annulo-nucleoplasty using Disc-FX in the management of lumbar disc pathology: early results. Int J Spine Surg. 2014; 8:18. DOI: 10.14444/1018.
Article
16. Hellinger S. Treatment of contained lumbar disc herniations using radiofrequency assisted micro-tubular decompression and nucleotomy: four year prospective study results. Int J Spine Surg. 2014; 8:24. DOI: 10.14444/1024.
Article
17. Lee SH, Lee SH, Lim KT. Trans-sacral epiduroscopic laser decompression for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a preliminary case series. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016; 34:121–9. DOI: 10.1089/pho.2015.4000. PMID: 26901647.
Article
18. Cheng J, Zheng W, Wang H, Li C, Wang J, Zhang Z, et al. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic diskectomy with thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain: a prospective observational study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(26 Spec No):B60–5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000495.
19. Derby R, Eek B, Chen Y, O’neill C, Ryan D. Intradiscal Electrothermal Annuloplasty (IDET): a novel approach for treating chronic discogenic back pain. Neuromodulation. 2000; 3:82–8. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2000.00082.x. PMID: 22151403.
Article
20. Yu SW, Sether LA, Ho PS, Wagner M, Haughton VM. Tears of the anulus fibrosus: correlation between MR and pathologic findings in cadavers. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988; 9:367–70. PMID: 3128085.
21. Bogduk N, Tynan W, Wilson AS. The nerve supply to the human lumbar intervertebral discs. J Anat. 1981; 132:39–56. PMID: 7275791. PMCID: 1233394.
22. Singh V, Piryani C, Liao K, Nieschulz S. Percutaneous disc decompression using coblation (nucleoplasty) in the treatment of chronic discogenic pain. Pain Physician. 2002; 5:250–9.
23. Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Caraway DL, Deer TR, Singh V, et al. An update of the systematic assessment of mechanical lumbar disc decompression with nucleoplasty. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(2 Suppl):SE25–54. PMID: 23615886.
24. Hirsch JA, Singh V, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy for the contained herniated lumbar disc: a systematic assessment of evidence. Pain Physician. 2009; 12:601–20. PMID: 19461826.
25. Moon BJ, Lee HY, Kim KN, Yi S, Ha Y, Yoon DH, et al. Experimental evaluation of percutaneous lumbar laser disc decompression using a 1414 nm Nd:YAG laser. Pain Physician. 2015; 18:E1091–9. PMID: 26606022.
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr