J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2019;16:5. 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.5.

Preadmission predictors of graduation success from a physical therapy education program in the United States

• Roman G
• Buman MP

• KMID: 2447240
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.5

Abstract

PURPOSE
The field of physical therapy education is seeking an evidence-based approach for admitting qualified applicants, as previous research has assessed various outcomes, impeding practical application. This study was conducted to identify preadmission criteria predictive of graduation success.
METHODS
Data from the 2013-2016 graduating cohorts (n=149) were collected. Predictors included verbal Graduate Record Examination rank percentile (VGRE%), quantitative GRE rank percentile, analytical GRE rank percentile, the admissions interview, precumulative science grade point average (SGPA), precumulative grade point average (UGPA), and a reflective essay. The National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE) and grade point average at the time of graduation (GGPA) were used as measures of graduation success. Two separate mixed-effects models determined the associations of preadmission predictors with NPTE performance and GGPA.
RESULTS
The NPTE model fit comparison showed significant results (degrees of freedom [df]=10, P=0.001), decreasing within-cohort variance by 59.5%. NPTE performance was associated with GGPA (β=125.21, P=0.001), and VGRE%, the interview, the essay, and GGPA (P≤0.001) impacted the model fit. The GGPA model fit comparison did not show significant results (df=8, P=0.56), decreasing within-cohort variance by 16.4%. The GGPA was associated with the interview (β=0.02, P=0.04) and UGPA (β=0.25, P=0.04), and VGRE%, the interview, UGPA, and the essay (P≤0.02) impacted model fit.
CONCLUSION
In our findings, GGPA predicted NPTE performance, and the interview and UGPA predicted GGPA. Unlike past evidence, SGPA showed no predictive power. The essay and VGRE% warrant attention because of their influence on model fit. We recommend that admissions ranking matrices place a greater weight on the interview, UGPA, VGRE%, and the essay.

Keyword

Education; Physical therapy; School admission criteria; United States

MeSH Terms

Cohort Studies
Education*
Freedom
School Admission Criteria
United States*

Reference

References

1. Ruscingno G, Zipp GP, Olson V. Admission variables and academic success in the first year of the professional phase in a doctor of physical therapy program. J Allied Health. 2010; 39:138–142.

2. Nuciforo M, Litvinsky Y, Rheault W. Variables predictive of admission to US physical therapist education programs. J Phys Ther Educ. 2014; 28:112–119. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201407000-00012.

3. Fell N, Mabey R, Mohr T, Ingram D. The preprofessional degree: is it a predictor of success in physical therapy education programs? J Phys Ther Educ. 2015; 29:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201529030-00004.

4. Jones PE, Simpkins S, Hocking JA. Imperfect physician assistant and physical therapist admissions processes in the United States. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014; 11:11. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.11.

5. Hekler EB, Buman MP, Ahn D, Dunton G, Atienza AA, King AC. Are daily fluctuations in perceived environment associated with walking? Psychol Health. 2012; 27:1009–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.645213.

6. Capers Q 4th, Clinchot D, McDougle L, Greenwald AG. Implicit racial bias in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2017; 92:365–369. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001388.

7. Physical Therapy Central Application Service. PTCAS application instructions [Internet]. Alexandria (VA): Physical Therapy Central Application Service;2018. [cited 2017 Apr 5]. Available from: http://www.ptcas.org.

8. Moneta-Koehler L, Brown AM, Petrie KA, Evans BJ, Chalkley R. The limitations of the GRE in predicting success in biomedical graduate school. PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0166742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166742.

9. Jette DU. Unflattening. J Phys Ther Educ. 2016; 30:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201630030-00003.

10. Cook C. 20th Pauline Cerasoli lecture: the Sunk Cost Fallacy. J Phys Ther Educ. 2017; 31:10–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001416-201731030-00005.

11. Wise D, Dominguez J, Kapasi Z, Williams-York B, Moerchen V, Brooks S, Ross LJ. Defining underrepresented minorities and promoting holistic review admission strategies in physical therapist education. J Phys Ther Educ. 2017; 31:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/jte.0000000000000009.