Korean J Radiol.  2019 Feb;20(2):265-274. 10.3348/kjr.2017.0634.

Accelerated Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sparse Undersampling and Iterative Reconstruction for the Evaluation of Intracranial Arteries

• Tang H
• Hu N
• Yuan Y
• Xia C
• Liu X
• Zuo P
• Stalder AF
• Schmidt M
• Zhou X
• Song B
• Sun J

• KMID: 2438257
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.0634

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To compare the image quality of three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction (sparse TOF) with that of conventional TOF MRA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study included 56 patients who had undergone sparse TOF MRA for intracranial artery evaluation on a 3T MR scanner. Conventional TOF MRA scans were also acquired from 29 patients with matched acquisition times and another 27 patients with matched scanning parameters. The image quality was scored using a five-point scale based on the delineation of arterial vessel segments, artifacts, overall vessel visualization, and overall image quality by two radiologists independently, and the data were analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Contrast ratios (CRs) of vessels were compared using the paired t test. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the kappa test.
RESULTS
Compared with conventional TOF at the same spatial resolution, sparse TOF with an acceleration factor of 3.5 could reduce acquisition time by 40% and showed comparable image quality. In addition, when compared with conventional TOF with the same acquisition time, sparse TOF with an acceleration factor of 5 could also achieve higher spatial resolution, better delineation of vessel segments, fewer artifacts, higher image quality, and a higher CR (p < 0.05). Good-to-excellent interobserver agreement (κ: 0.65-1.00) was obtained between the two radiologists.
CONCLUSION
Compared with conventional TOF, sparse TOF can achieve equivalent image quality in a reduced duration. Furthermore, using the same acquisition time, sparse TOF could improve the delineation of vessels and decrease image artifacts.

Keyword

Time-of-Flight (TOF); Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); Intracranial vessels; Sparse; Iterative reconstruction

MeSH Terms

Acceleration
Arteries*
Artifacts
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Angiography*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Axial MIP images from conventional TOF (A) and sparse TOF (B) using same spatial resolution in 60-year-old man.Display of lesion in left MCA is poorer on conventional TOF (A) because of motion artifacts (arrow). MCA = middle cerebral artery, MIP = maximum intensity projection, sparse TOF = TOF with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction, TOF = time-of-flight

• 

  Fig. 2 Statistical analysis of CRs between conventional TOF and sparse TOF on original and MIP images.A, B. CR shows no difference on original images but shows slight increase on MIP images for scanning-resolution-matched sparse TOF compared with that of conventional TOF (0.64 ± 0.05 vs. 0.61 ± 0.05, **p < 0.001). C, D. CR increased from 0.58 ± 0.06 to 0.60 ± 0.06 on original images (*p < 0.05) and from 0.59 ± 0.04 to 0.64 ± 0.04 on MIP images (**p < 0.001) on scanning-time-matched sparse TOF compared with conventional TOF. CR = contrast ratio, orig = original images

• 

  Fig. 3 Axial MIP images from conventional TOF (A, C) and sparse TOF (B, D) using same scanning time in two patients.A and B are from 46-year-old woman and C and D are from 70-year-old man with left MCA stenosis. Delineation of fine vessels is better with sparse TOF than conventional TOF (arrowheads). Moreover, display of vessel stenosis is clearer with sparse TOF than with conventional TOF (arrows).

Reference

1. Keller PJ, Drayer BP, Fram EK, Williams KD, Dumoulin CL, Souza SP. MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display. Work in progress. Radiology. 1989; 173:527–532. PMID: 2798885.

2. Miyazaki M, Akahane M. Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: established techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 35:1–19. PMID: 22173999.

3. Wheaton AJ, Miyazaki M. Non-contrast enhanced MR angiography: physical principles. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36:286–304. PMID: 22807222.

4. Laub GA. Time-of-flight method of MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1995; 3:391–398. PMID: 7584245.

5. Cho YD, Kim KM, Lee WJ, Sohn CH, Kang HS, Kim JE, et al. Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15:161–168. PMID: 24497808.

6. Papke K, Brassel F. Modern cross-sectional imaging in the diagnosis and follow-up of intracranial aneurysms. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16:2051–2066. PMID: 16416105.

7. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999; 42:952–962. PMID: 10542355.

8. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002; 47:1202–1210. PMID: 12111967.

9. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58:1182–1195. PMID: 17969013.

10. Donoho DL. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2006; 52:1289–1306.

11. Liang D, Liu B, Wang J, Ying L. Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 62:1574–1584. PMID: 19785017.

12. Stalder AF, Schmidt M, Quick HH, Schlamann M, Maderwald S, Schmitt P, et al. Highly undersampled contrast-enhanced MRA with iterative reconstruction: integration in a clinical setting. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 74:1652–1660. PMID: 25522299.

13. Rapacchi S, Han F, Natsuaki Y, Kroeker R, Plotnik A, Lehrman E, et al. High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction. Magn Reson Med. 2014; 71:1771–1783. PMID: 23801456.

14. Hutter J, Grimm R, Forman C, Hornegger J, Schmitt P. Highly undersampled peripheral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: optimized data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction. MAGMA. 2015; 28:437–446. PMID: 25605300.

15. Forman C, Piccini D, Grimm R, Hutter J, Hornegger J, Zenge MO. High-resolution 3D whole-heart coronary MRA: a study on the combination of data acquisition in multiple breath-holds and 1D residual respiratory motion compensation. MAGMA. 2014; 27:435–443. PMID: 24402560.

16. Natsuaki Y, Bi X, Zenge M, Speier P, Schmitt P, Laub G. Time-Of-Flight with sparse undersampling (TOFu): towards practical MR applications of the compressed sensing. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2014; 22:941.

17. Stalder AF, Natsuaki Y, Schmidt M, Bi X, Zenge MO, Nadar M, et al. Accelerating TOF MRA in clinical practice using sparse MRI with variable poisson density sampling. In : International Society for ISMRM Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: ONE community for Clinicians and scientists 23rd annual meeting; 2015 May 30-June 5; Toronto, Canada.

18. Fushimi Y, Okada T, Kikuchi T, Yamamoto A, Okada T, Yamamoto T, et al. Clinical evaluation of time-of-flight MR angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction for cerebral aneurysms. NMR Biomed. 2017; 30:3774.

19. Yamamoto T, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Fushimi Y, Stalder AF, Natsuaki Y, et al. Time of Flight magnetic resonance angiography with sparse undersampling and iterative reconstruction: comparison with conventional parallel imaging for accelerated imaging. Invest Radiol. 2016; 51:372–378. PMID: 26561046.

20. Fushimi Y, Fujimoto K, Okada T, Yamamoto A, Tanaka T, Kikuchi T, et al. Compressed sensing 3-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms: optimization and evaluation. Invest Radiol. 2016; 51:228–235. PMID: 26606551.

21. Akasaka T, Fujimoto K, Yamamoto T, Okada T, Fushimi Y, Yamamoto A, et al. Optimization of regularization parameters in compressed sensing of magnetic resonance angiography: can statistical image metrics mimic radiologists' perception? PLoS One. 2016; 11:e0146548. PMID: 26744843.

22. Kayvanrad M, Lin A, Joshi R, Chiu J, Peters T. Diagnostic quality assessment of compressed sensing accelerated magnetic resonance neuroimaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 44:433–444. PMID: 26777856.

23. Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-Thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci. 2009; 2:183–202.

24. Wrede KH, Johst S, Dammann P, Özkan N, Mönninghoff C, Kraemer M, et al. Improved cerebral time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 7 Tesla – Feasibility study and preliminary results using optimized venous saturation pulses. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e106697. PMID: 25232868.

25. de Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, van Gelderen P, Bodurka J, Chu R, Duyn JH. Signal-to-noise ratio and parallel imaging performance of a 16-channel receive-only brain coil array at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51:22–26. PMID: 14705041.

26. Lin FH, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Wald LL. Parallel imaging reconstruction using automatic regularization. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51:559–567. PMID: 15004798.

27. Michaely HJ, Herrmann KA, Kramer H, Dietrich O, Laub G, Reiser MF, et al. High-resolution renal MRA: comparison of image quality and vessel depiction with different parallel imaging acceleration factors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 24:95–100. PMID: 16729261.

28. Forman C, Piccini D, Grimm R, Hutter J, Hornegger J, Zenge MO. Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts for free-breathing whole-heart coronary MRA by weighted iterative reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015; 73:1885–1895. PMID: 24912763.