1. de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192:1701–1707.
Article
2. Shapiro L, Staroswiecki E, Gold G. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging. Semin Roentgenol. 2010; 45:238–249.
Article
3. Gold GE, Suh B, Sawyer-Glover A, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183:1479–1486.
4. Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002; 22:1223–1246.
5. Jung JY, Jee WH, Park MY, Lee SY, Kim YS. Supraspinatus tendon tears at 3.0 T shoulder MR arthrography: diagnosis with 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus 2D conventional sequences. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41:1401–1410.
6. Jung JY, Jee WH, Park MY, Lee SY, Kim YS. SLAP tears: diagnosis using 3-T shoulder MR arthrography with the 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo space sequence versus conventional 2D sequences. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23:487–495.
Article
7. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Choi SH, Kwon JW, Yoo J, Choe BK. Three-dimensional isotropic shoulder MR arthrography: comparison with two-dimensional MR arthrography for the diagnosis of labral lesions at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2009; 250:498–505.
Article
8. Magee T. Can isotropic fast gradient echo imaging be substituted for conventional T1 weighted sequences in shoulder MR arthrography at 3 Tesla? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26:118–122.
Article
9. Lee JH, Yoon YC, Jee S, Kwon JW, Cha JG, Yoo JC. Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic and two-dimensional conventional indirect MR arthrography for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15:771–780.
Article
10. Park SY, Lee IS, Park SK, Cheon SJ, Ahn JM, Song JW. Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic and conventional MR arthrography with respect to the diagnosis of rotator cuff and labral lesions: focus on isotropic fat-suppressed proton density and VIBE sequences. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69:e173–182.
Article
11. Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Kim OH, Seo SS, Kim JH. Comparison of three-dimensional isotropic T1-weighted fast spin-echo MR arthrography with two-dimensional MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology. 2012; 262:921–931.
Article
12. Kijowski R, Davis KW, Blankenbaker DG, Woods MA, Del Rio AM, De Smet AA. Evaluation of the menisci of the knee joint using three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin-echo imaging: diagnostic performance in 250 patients with surgical correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41:169–178.
Article
13. Kijowski R, Davis KW, Woods MA, et al. Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging–diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2009; 252:486–495.
Article
14. Notohamiprodjo M, Horng A, Pietschmann MF, et al. MRI of the knee at 3T: first clinical results with an isotropic PDfs-weighted 3D-TSE-sequence. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44:585–597.
15. Notohamiprodjo M, Kuschel B, Horng A, et al. 3D-MRI of the ankle with optimized 3D-SPACE. Invest Radiol. 2012; 47:231–239.
Article
16. Ristow O, Steinbach L, Sabo G, et al. Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo imaging versus standard 2D imaging at 3.0 T of the knee–image quality and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19:1263–1272.
Article
17. Yao L, Pitts JT, Thomasson D. Isotropic 3D fast spin-echo with proton-density-like contrast: a comprehensive approach to musculoskeletal MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188:W199–201.
Article
18. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall. 1991. 404–409.
19. Oh DK, Yoon YC, Kwon JW, et al. Comparison of indirect isotropic MR arthrography and conventional MR arthrography of labral lesions and rotator cuff tears: a prospective study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192:473–479.
Article
20. Park HJ, Lee SY, Kim MS, et al. Evaluation of shoulder pathology: three-dimensional enhanced T1 high-resolution isotropic volume excitation MR vs two-dimensional fast spin echo T2 fat saturation MR. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88:20140147.
21. Stevens KJ, Busse RF, Han E, et al. Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube–initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology. 2008; 249:1026–1033.
Article
22. Van Dyck P, Gielen JL, Vanhoenacker FM, et al. Diagnostic performance of 3D SPACE for comprehensive knee joint assessment at 3 T. Insights Imaging. 2012; 3:603–610.
Article
23. Koo SS, Burkhart SS. Subscapularis tendon tears: identifying mid to distal footprint disruptions. Arthroscopy. 2010; 26:1130–1134.
Article
24. David TS, Bravo H, Scobercea R. Arthroscopic visualization of subscapularis tendon lesions. Orthopedics. 2009; 32.
Article
25. Magee T, Williams D. 3.0-T MRI of the supraspinatus tendon. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187:881–886.
Article
26. Jung JY, Yoon YC, Yi SK, Yoo J, Choe BK. Comparison study of indirect MR arthrography and direct MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 38:659–667.
Article
27. Pfirrmann CW, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Gerber C, Hodler J. Subscapularis tendon tears: detection and grading at MR arthrography. Radiology. 1999; 213:709–714.
Article
28. Gyftopoulos S, O'Donnell J, Shah NP, Goss J, Babb J, Recht MP. Correlation of MRI with arthroscopy for the evaluation of the subscapularis tendon: a musculoskeletal division's experience. Skeletal Radiol. 2013; 42:1269–1275.
Article
29. Jung JY, Jee WH, Chun CW, Kim YS. Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography with anterior trans-subscapularis versus posterior injection approach for subscapularis tendon tears at 3.0T. Eur Radiol. 2017; 27:1303–1311.
Article