J Breast Cancer.  2010 Sep;13(3):311-317.

Incidental Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast from Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy of Asymptomatic BRCA2 Mutation Carrier: A Case Report

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. paojlus@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Surgery, Breast Care Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

In women at high-risk for breast cancer with a BRCA mutation, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) may achieve a risk reduction. A 35-year-old woman had a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancer. She had a regular checkup and found masses in both breasts that confirmed intraductal papillomas and atypical ductal hyperplasia after vacuum assisted mass excision. When she was referred to our clinic, the genetic testing for BRCA mutation was recommended to her sister that managed for ovarian cancer. It was resulted in the positive for the BRCA2 mutation, so she had checked the genetic testing which resulted in the same as the mutation. After sufficient counseling, she decided to undergo BPM and immediate reconstruction. She is satisfied with the result of surgery. This is the first report of BPM of asymptomatic BRCA2 mutation carrier in Korea and BPM should be considered as a risk-reducing option for BRCA mutation carriers.

Keyword

Bilateral mastectomy; BRCA2 gene mutation; Breast neoplasms; Hereditary; Prevention

MeSH Terms

Adult
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Ductal
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Counseling
Female
Genetic Testing
Humans
Hyperplasia
Korea
Mastectomy
Mustard Compounds
Ovarian Neoplasms
Papilloma, Intraductal
Risk Reduction Behavior
Siblings
Vacuum
Mustard Compounds

Figure

  • Figure 1 Family pedigree. One of patient's sisters had breast cancer and the other sister has ovarian cancer. Patient has BRCA2 mutation. Arrow indicates patient. ca=cancer; Lt.=left; DCIS=ductal carcinoma in situ.

  • Figure 2 Preoperative design. A bilateral nipple sparing total mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Note the multiple previous scars from vacuum assisted mass excision. Note the neck scar from previous right thyroid lobectomy with central lymph node dissection.

  • Figure 3 Postoperative specimens of the both breasts. A silk suture on the specimen was placed to mark the margin of the nipple side.

  • Figure 4 Pathology of the left breast. Ductal carcinomas in situ, solid type, was identified in the upper central portion of the left breast (H&E staining, A, ×100; B, ×400).


Reference

1. Finch A, Beiner M, Lubinski J, Lynch HT, Moller P, Rosen B, et al. Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation. JAMA. 2006. 296:185–192.
Article
2. Narod SA, Offit K. Prevention and management of hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:1656–1663.
Article
3. Gahm J, Jurell G, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M. Patient satisfaction with aesthetic outcome after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010. 63:332–338.
Article
4. Tan MB, Bleiker EM, Menke-Pluymers MB, Van Gool AR, van Dooren S, Van Geel BN, et al. Standard psychological consultations and follow up for women at increased risk of hereditary breast cancer considering prophylactic mastectomy. Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2009. 7:6.
Article
5. Kim KS, Kim S, Han SA, Kang E, Jeon YT, Ha TH, et al. Contralateral propylactic mastectomy and prophylactic salphingo-oophorectomy in a BRCA1-positive breast cancer patient: a case report. J Breast Cancer. 2008. 11:218–222.
Article
6. Hahn HM, Yeom TH, Shin YW, Kim KH, Youn DJ, Jung KJ. A standardization study of beck depression inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1986. 25:487–502.
7. Scheier MF, Carver CC, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994. 67:1063–1078.
Article
8. Han DW, Lee CH, Tark JK. Standardization of Spielberger's anxiety test. Korean Psychological Association. accessed March 20th, 2010. http://www.koreanpsychology.or.kr.
9. John EW. A community for measureing health outcomes using SF tools. SF-36 Health Survey Update. accessed March 20th, 2010. http://www.sf-36.org.
10. Healey EA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR. Contralateral breast cancer: clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 1993. 11:1545–1552.
Article
11. Kollias J, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Blamey RW. Clinical and histological predictors of contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1999. 25:584–589.
Article
12. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, Morris TJ, Virnig BA. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007. 25:5203–5209.
Article
13. Hoogerbrugge N, Bult P, de Widt-Levert LM, Beex LV, Kiemeney LA, Ligtenberg MJ, et al. High prevalence of premalignant lesions in prophylactically removed breasts from women at hereditary risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:41–45.
Article
14. Isern AE, Loman N, Malina J, Olsson H, Ringberg A. Histopathological findings and follow-up after prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in 100 women from families with hereditary breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008. 34:1148–1154.
Article
15. Kauff ND, Brogi E, Scheuer L, Pathak DR, Borgen PI, Hudis CA, et al. Epithelial lesions in prophylactic mastectomy specimens from women with BRCA mutations. Cancer. 2003. 97:1601–1608.
Article
16. Brandberg Y, Sandelin K, Erikson S, Jurell G, Liljegren A, Lindblom A, et al. Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26:3943–3949.
Article
17. Ashikari RH, Ashikari AY, Kelemen PR, Salzberg CA. Subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction for prevention of breast cancer for high-risk patients. Breast Cancer. 2008. 15:185–191.
Article
18. Garcia-Etienne CA, CodyIii HS 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009. 15:440–449.
Article
19. Boughey JC, Cormier JN, Xing Y, Hunt KK, Meric-Bernstam F, Babiera GV, et al. Decision analysis to assess the efficacy of routine sentinel lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. Cancer. 2007. 110:2542–2550.
Article
20. Dupont EL, Kuhn MA, McCann C, Salud C, Spanton JL, Cox CE. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2000. 180:274–277.
Article
21. Schrag D, Kuntz KM, Garber JE, Weeks JC. Life expectancy gains from cancer prevention strategies for women with breast cancer and BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. JAMA. 2000. 283:617–624.
Article
22. Kim KS, Kim SW, Lee MH, Ahn SH, Park SK. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Practice patterns of surgeons for the management of hereditary breast cancer in Korea. J Breast Cancer. 2008. 11:95–101.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr