J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2018 Sep;59(9):854-860. 10.3341/jkos.2018.59.9.854.

Comparison of Clinical Features among Children of Multicultural Families, Ethnic Koreans and Native Koreans

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea. mychoi@chungbuk.ac.kr
  • 2Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To explore whether genetic and environmental factors influenced ophthalmic disease among children of multicultural families, ethnic Koreans, and native Koreans.
METHODS
In this retrospective study, 120 patients who visited the pediatric ophthalmology clinic of a university hospital were included. They were equally divided into three groups: a multicultural group, an ethnic Korean group, and a native Korean group. Parental nationalities, age, gender, chief complaint, visual acuity, refractive error, diagnosis at the initial visit and the extent of compliance with treatment were analyzed.
RESULTS
Of the multicultural group, 14 (35%) of 40 patients were Chinese immigrants, and constituted the most common subgroup. None of the age at initial visit, gender, the prevalence of refractive error, or amblyopia status differed significantly among the three groups. In the multicultural and native Korean groups, the proportions of abnormal eye positioning as the chief complaint were higher than that of the ethnic Korean group (p = 0.005). The most common diagnosis in the two former groups was strabismus. Myopia was the most common diagnosis in the ethnic Korean group. The prevalence of strabismus in the multicultural group (55%) was significantly higher than that in the native Korean group (30%) and the ethnic Korean group (20%) (p = 0.003). The prevalence of strabismus in the multicultural group was significantly higher than in the other groups (p = 0.003). However, we found no significant difference in strabismus subtype among the three groups. In the general family group, the extent of loss to follow-up was significantly higher than in the other groups (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
The chief complaint, the prevalence of ophthalmic disease, and the compliance rate differed significantly among the three groups. Both genetic and environmental factors may have played a role.

Keyword

Amblyopia; Ethnic Korean family; Multicultural family; Myopia; Strabismus

MeSH Terms

Amblyopia
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Child*
Compliance
Diagnosis
Emigrants and Immigrants
Ethnic Groups
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Myopia
Ophthalmology
Parents
Prevalence
Refractive Errors
Retrospective Studies
Strabismus
Visual Acuity

Reference

References

1. Xiao O, Morgan IG, Ellwein LB, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia in school-aged children and variations by age, gender, and ethnicity in a multi-country refractive error study. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:1924–31.
2. Wen G, Tarczy-Hornoch K, McKean-Cowdin R, et al. Prevalence of myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in non-Hispanic white and Asian children: abdominal pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:2109–16.
3. McKean-Cowdin R, Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, et al. Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in asian and non-Hispanic white preschool children: abdominal pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120:2117–24.
4. Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic abdominal ages 6 to 72 months the abdominal pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2128–34.
5. Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group. Prevalence of myopia and hyperopia in 6-to 72-month-old African American and Hispanic children: the abdominal pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:140–7.
6. Rho SS, Yang HS, Chang YH, et al. The effect on outcome of abdominal treatment in children with anisometropic amblyopia. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:535–40.
7. Sherwin JC, Reacher MH, Keogh RH, et al. The association between time spent outdoors and myopia in children and adolescents: a abdominal review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:2141–51.
8. Li SM, Li SY, Kang MT, et al. Near work related parameters and myopia in Chinese children: the Anyang childhood eye study. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0134514.
Article
9. Chia A, Roy L, Seenyen L. Comitant horizontal strabismus: an Asian perspective. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91:1337–40.
Article
10. Tinley C, Grötte R. Comitant horizontal strabismus in south African black and mixed race children–a clinic-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012; 19:89–94.
Article
11. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of abdominal and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123:1036–42.
12. Rim TH, Kim SH, Lim KH, et al. Refractive Errors in Koreans: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2012. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2016; 30:214–24.
Article
13. Foster PJ, Jiang Y. Epidemiology of myopia. Eye (Lond). 2014; 28:202–8.
Article
14. Choi KW, Koo BS, Lee HY. Preschool vision screening in Korea: results in 2003. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:112–20.
15. Choi MY, Hwang JM. Clinical analysis of sensory strabismus with organic amblyopia in children. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005; 46:1374–81.
16. Yi SG, Shin SY, Kim SA, et al. Relationship between health behav-iors and family function in multicultural family female immigrants. Korean J Fam Pract. 2012; 2:51–63.
17. Kim YP, Park HK, Hwang HS. FACES III and family APGAR score of multicultural family marriage female migrant in Jeollanam-do province. Korean J Fam Med. 2009; 30:210–20.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr