Yonsei Med J.  2018 Oct;59(8):951-959. 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.8.951.

Prospective Single Arm Study on the Effect of Ilaprazole in Patients with Heartburn but No Reflux Esophagitis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. SKLEE@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis show varying responses to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The aim of this study was to objectively evaluate the effect of a new PPI, ilaprazole, on patients with heartburn but without reflux esophagitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This prospective study was performed on 20 patients with heartburn but without reflux esophagitis. All patients underwent upper endoscopy and 24-hr combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal monitoring (MII-pH). They were then treated with ilaprazole (20 mg) once daily for 4 weeks. The GerdQ questionnaire, histologic findings, and inflammatory biomarkers were used for assessment before and after ilaprazole.
RESULTS
Among the 20 patients, 13 (65%) showed GerdQ score ≥8. Based on MII-pH results, patients were classified as true nonerosive reflux disease (n=2), hypersensitive esophagus (n=10), and functional heartburn (n=8). After treatment, patients showed a statistically significant improvement in GerdQ score (p < 0.001). Among histopathologic findings, basal cell hyperplasia, papillary elongation, and infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes improved significantly (p=0.008, p=0.021, and p=0.008; respectively). Expression of TNF-α, IL-8, TRPV1, and MCP-1 decreased marginally after treatment (p=0.049, p=0.046, p=0.045, and p=0.042; respectively).
CONCLUSION
Daily ilaprazole (20 mg) is efficacious in improving symptom scores, histopathologic findings, and inflammatory biomarkers in patients with heartburn but no reflux esophagitis.

Keyword

Heartburn; reflux esophagitis; proton pump inhibitors; ilaprazole

MeSH Terms

Arm*
Biomarkers
Electric Impedance
Endoscopy
Esophagitis
Esophagitis, Peptic*
Esophagus
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Heartburn*
Humans
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Hyperplasia
Interleukin-8
Prospective Studies*
Proton Pump Inhibitors
T-Lymphocytes
Biomarkers
Interleukin-8
Proton Pump Inhibitors

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study design. NERD, non-erosive reflux disease; EGJ, esophagogastric junction.

  • Fig. 2 Histologic findings before and after treatment: basal cell hyperplasia (p=0.008); papillary elongation (p=0.021); DIS (p=0.391); infiltration of intraepithelial eosinophils (p=0.348); infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes (p=0.008). *p<0.05, †p<0.01. DIS, dilated intercellular spaces; eosinophils, infiltration of intraepithelial eosinophils; T lymphocytes, infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes.

  • Fig. 3 Representative cases showing changes in histologic findings after treatment with ilaprazole. Several histologic findings showed improvement following treatment. The thickness of the basal layer changed from 40% (H&E, ×100) (A) to 10% (H&E, ×100) (B). The length of papillae changed from 80% (H&E, ×100) (C) to 40% (H&E, ×100) (D) of the total epithelial thickness. Infiltration of T lymphocytes changed from 16/high power field (H&E, ×200) (E) to 4/high power field (H&E, ×200) (F). H&E, hematoxylin and eosin.

  • Fig. 4 Histologic responses between reflux-related subtype (true NERD+hypersensitivity group) and proton pump inhibitor-responsive functional heartburn groups. The degrees of basal cell hyperplasia (p=0.034), papillary elongation (p=0.023), and infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes (p=0.034) were reduced significantly in the reflux-related group. *p<0.05. T lymphocytes, infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes. NERD, nonerosive reflux disease; HE, hypersensitive esophagus.

  • Fig. 5 Histologic responses between patients with GerdQ ≥8 and GerdQ <8. The degrees of basal cell hyperplasia (p=0.043) and papillary elongation (p=0.048) were reduced significantly patients with GerdQ ≥8. The papillary elongation was reduced significantly in patients with GerdQ <8 (p=0.038). *p<0.05. T lymphocytes, infiltration of intraepithelial T lymphocytes.

  • Fig. 6 Inflammatory biomarkers before and after treatment. (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-8, (C) IL-1β, (D) TRPV1, and (E) MCP-1 were measured by qRT-PCR. GAPDH was used as the endogenous control. The Ct values of TNF-α, IL-8, TRPV1, and MCP-1 were normalized to GAPDH using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Some samples were not sufficient to perform qRT-PCR, and only reliable qRT-PCR data points were used for analysis (TNF-α: 16; IL-8: 18; IL-1β: 19; TRPV1: 18; MCP-1: 14). *p<0.05. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IL-8, interleukin 8; IL-1β, interleukin-1 beta; TRPV1, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; qRT-PCR, quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.


Reference

1. Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA, Johansson S. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2005; 54:710–717. PMID: 15831922.
Article
2. Dent J. Microscopic esophageal mucosal injury in nonerosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007; 5:4–16. PMID: 17157563.
Article
3. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Savarino V. NERD: an umbrella term including heterogeneous subpopulations. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:371–380. PMID: 23528345.
Article
4. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, Pohl D, Casa DD, Frazzoni M, et al. The role of nonacid reflux in NERD: lessons learned from impedance-pH monitoring in 150 patients off therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103:2685–2693. PMID: 18775017.
Article
5. Dean BB, Gano AD Jr, Knight K, Ofman JJ, Fass R. Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2:656–664. PMID: 15290657.
Article
6. Ji XQ, Du JF, Chen G, Chen G, Yu B. Efficacy of ilaprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:5119–5123. PMID: 24803828.
Article
7. Periclou AP, Goldwater R, Lee SM, Park DW, Kim DY, Cho KD, et al. A comparative pharmacodynamic study of IY-81149 versus omeprazole in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 68:304–311. PMID: 11014412.
Article
8. de Bortoli N, Martinucci I, Giacchino M, Blandizzi C, Marchi S, Savarino V, et al. The pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole for gastroesophageal reflux treatment. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2013; 9:1361–1369. PMID: 23802731.
Article
9. Du YQ, Guo WY, Zou DW, Zhan XB, Li Z, Hu JH, et al. Acid inhibition effect of ilaprazole on Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers: an open randomized cross-over study. J Dig Dis. 2012; 13:113–119. PMID: 22257480.
Article
10. Fiocca R, Mastracci L, Riddell R, Takubo K, Vieth M, Yerian L, et al. Development of consensus guidelines for the histologic recognition of microscopic esophagitis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto project. Hum Pathol. 2010; 41:223–231. PMID: 19800099.
Article
11. Yerian L, Fiocca R, Mastracci L, Riddell R, Vieth M, Sharma P, et al. Refinement and reproducibility of histologic criteria for the assessment of microscopic lesions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the Esohisto Project. Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56:2656–2665. PMID: 21365241.
Article
12. Weusten BL, Roelofs JM, Akkermans LM, Van Berge-Henegouwen GP, Smout AJ. The symptom-association probability: an improved method for symptom analysis of 24-hour esophageal pH data. Gastroenterology. 1994; 107:1741–1745. PMID: 7958686.
Article
13. Ward BW, Wu WC, Richter JE, Lui KW, Castell DO. Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring. Technology searching for a clinical application. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986; 8(Suppl 1):59–67. PMID: 3734378.
14. Tielemans MM, van Oijen MG. Online follow-up of individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease using a patient-reported outcomes instrument: results of an observational study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013; 13:144. PMID: 24083342.
Article
15. Tielemans MM, Jansen JB, van Oijen MG. Open access capture of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using an online patient-reported outcomes instrument. Interact J Med Res. 2012; 1:e7. PMID: 23611985.
Article
16. Suzuki H, Matsuzaki J, Okada S, Hirata K, Fukuhara S, Hibi T. Validation of the GerdQ questionnaire for the management of gastrooesophageal reflux disease in Japan. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013; 1:175–183.
Article
17. Quigley EM. Non-erosive reflux disease, functional heartburn and gastroesophageal reflux disease; insights into pathophysiology and clinical presentation. Chin J Dig Dis. 2006; 7:186–190. PMID: 17054579.
Article
18. Savarino E, Zentilin P, Tutuian R, Pohl D, Gemignani L, Malesci A, et al. Impedance-pH reflux patterns can differentiate non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn patients. J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47:159–168. PMID: 22038553.
Article
19. Long JD, Orlando RC. Nonerosive reflux disease: a pathophysiologic perspective. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2008; 10:200–207. PMID: 18625127.
Article
20. Stolte M, Vieth M, Schmitz JM, Alexandridis T, Seifert E. Effects of long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on the histological findings in the lower oesophagus. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000; 35:1125–1130. PMID: 11145281.
21. Vieth M, Peitz U, Labenz J, Kulig M, Nauclér E, Jaspersen D, et al. What parameters are relevant for the histological diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease without Barrett's mucosa? Dig Dis. 2004; 22:196–201. PMID: 15383761.
Article
22. Kandulski A, Jechorek D, Caro C, Weigt J, Wex T, Mönkemüller K, et al. Histomorphological differentiation of non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn in patients with PPI-refractory heartburn. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013; 38:643–651. PMID: 23895770.
Article
23. Funch-Jensen P, Kock K, Christensen LA, Fallingborg J, Kjaergaard JJ, Andersen SP, et al. Microscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa in a consecutive series of patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Correlation with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and macroscopic findings. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986; 21:65–69. PMID: 3952454.
Article
24. Kiesslich R, Kanzler S, Vieth M, Moehler M, Neidig J, Thanka Nadar BJ, et al. Minimal change esophagitis: prospective comparison of endoscopic and histological markers between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and normal controls using magnifying endoscopy. Dig Dis. 2004; 22:221–227. PMID: 15383765.
Article
25. Farré R, Fornari F, Blondeau K, Vieth M, De Vos R, Bisschops R, et al. Acid and weakly acidic solutions impair mucosal integrity of distal exposed and proximal non-exposed human oesophagus. Gut. 2010; 59:164–169. PMID: 19880965.
Article
26. Caviglia R, Ribolsi M, Maggiano N, Gabbrielli AM, Emerenziani S, Guarino MP, et al. Dilated intercellular spaces of esophageal epithelium in nonerosive reflux disease patients with physiological esophageal acid exposure. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005; 100:543–548. PMID: 15743349.
Article
27. Isomoto H, Nishi Y, Kanazawa Y, Shikuwa S, Mizuta Y, Inoue K, et al. Immune and inflammatory responses in GERD and lansoprazole. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2007; 41:84–91. PMID: 18193101.
Article
28. Isomoto H, Saenko VA, Kanazawa Y, Nishi Y, Ohtsuru A, Inoue K, et al. Enhanced expression of interleukin-8 and activation of nuclear factor kappa-B in endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:589–597. PMID: 15089887.
Article
29. Mönkemüller K, Wex T, Kuester D, Fry LC, Peitz U, Beyer M, et al. Interleukin-1beta and interleukin-8 expression correlate with the histomorphological changes in esophageal mucosa of patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux disease. Digestion. 2009; 79:186–195. PMID: 19342859.
Article
30. Shieh KR, Yi CH, Liu TT, Tseng HL, Ho HC, Hsieh HT, et al. Evidence for neurotrophic factors associating with TRPV1 gene expression in the inflamed human esophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010; 22:971–977. e252. PMID: 20518854.
Article
31. Isomoto H, Wang A, Mizuta Y, Akazawa Y, Ohba K, Omagari K, et al. Elevated levels of chemokines in esophageal mucosa of patients with reflux esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98:551–556. PMID: 12650786.
Article
32. Isomoto H, Nishi Y, Wang A, Takeshima F, Omagari K, Mizuta Y, et al. Mucosal concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines at gastric cardia: implication of Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99:1063–1068. PMID: 15180726.
Article
33. Yoshida N, Uchiyama K, Kuroda M, Sakuma K, Kokura S, Ichikawa H, et al. Interleukin-8 expression in the esophageal mucosa of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004; 39:816–822. PMID: 15513378.
Article
34. Noordzij JP, Khidr A, Evans BA, Desper E, Mittal RK, Reibel JF, et al. Evaluation of omeprazole in the treatment of reflux laryngitis: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111:2147–2151. PMID: 11802014.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr