1. Prat J. Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features. Virchows Arch. 2012; 460:237–249.
Article
2. Sturgeon CM, Duffy MJ, Stenman UH, Lilja H, Brunner N, Chan DW, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry laboratory medicine practice guidelines for use of tumor markers in testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian cancers. Clin Chem. 2008; 54:e11–e79.
Article
3. Badgwell D, Bast RC Jr. Early detection of ovarian cancer. Dis Markers. 2007; 23:397–410.
Article
4. Moore RG, Miller MC, Steinhoff MM, Skates SJ, Lu KH, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Serum HE4 levels are less frequently elevated than CA125 in women with benign gynecologic disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206:351.e1–351.e8.
Article
5. Rustin GJ, Nelstrop AE, McClean P, Brady MF, McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, et al. Defining response of ovarian carcinoma to initial chemotherapy according to serum CA 125. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14:1545–1551.
Article
6. Rustin GJ, Nelstrop AE, Bentzen SM, Bond SJ, McClean P. Selection of active drugs for ovarian cancer based on CA-125 and standard response rates in phase II trials. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18:1733–1739.
Article
7. Yamashita K, Watanabe M. Clinical significance of tumor markers and an emerging perspective on colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci. 2009; 100:195–199.
Article
8. Chou YY, Jeng YM, Kao HL, Chen T, Mao TL, Lin MC. Differentiation of ovarian mucinous carcinoma and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma by immunostaining with beta-catenin. Histopathology. 2003; 43:151–156.
9. Lagendijk JH, Mullink H, Van Diest PJ, Meijer GA, Meijer CJ. Tracing the origin of adenocarcinomas with unknown primary using immunohistochemistry: differential diagnosis between colonic and ovarian carcinomas as primary sites. Hum Pathol. 1998; 29:491–497.
Article
10. Raspollini MR, Amunni G, Villanucci A, Baroni G, Taddei A, Taddei GL. Utility of CDX-2 in distinguishing between primary and secondary (intestinal) mucinous ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical comparison of 43 cases. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2004; 12:127–131.
11. Sorensen SS, Mosgaard BJ. Combination of cancer antigen 125 and carcinoembryonic antigen can improve ovarian cancer diagnosis. Dan Med Bull. 2011; 58:A4331.
12. Changes in definitions of clinical staging for carcinoma of the cervix and ovary: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987; 156:263–264.
13. Bast RC Jr, Feeney M, Lazarus H, Nadler LM, Colvin RB, Knapp RC. Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 1981; 68:1331–1337.
Article
14. Bast RC Jr, Klug TL, St John E, Jenison E, Niloff JM, Lazarus H, et al. A radioimmunoassay using a monoclonal antibody to monitor the course of epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1983; 309:883–887.
Article
15. Bast RC Jr, Klug TL, Schaetzl E, Lavin P, Niloff JM, Greber TF, et al. Monitoring human ovarian carcinoma with a combination of CA 125, CA 19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984; 149:553–559.
Article
16. Einhorn N, Bast RC Jr, Knapp RC, Tjernberg B, Zurawski VR Jr. Preoperative evaluation of serum CA 125 levels in patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 67:414–416.
17. Jacobs I, Bast RC Jr. The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod. 1989; 4:1–12.
Article
18. Hogdall EV, Christensen L, Kjaer SK, Blaakaer J, Kjaerbye-Thygesen A, Gayther S, et al. CA125 expression pattern, prognosis and correlation with serum CA125 in ovarian tumor patients. From The Danish “MALOVA” Ovarian Cancer Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 104:508–515.
19. Kenemans P, Yedema CA, Bon GG, von Mensdorff-Pouilly S. CA 125 in gynecological pathology--a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993; 49:115–124.
20. de Bruijn HW, van der Zee AG, Aalders JG. The value of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) during treatment and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 9:8–13.
Article
21. Chen DX, Schwartz PE, Li XG, Yang Z. Evaluation of CA 125 levels in differentiating malignant from benign tumors in patients with pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72:23–27.
22. Patsner B, Mann WJ. The value of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in patients with a pelvic mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 159:873–876.
Article
23. Vasilev SA, Schlaerth JB, Campeau J, Morrow CP. Serum CA 125 levels in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 71:751–756.
24. Smith LH, Oi RH. Detection of malignant ovarian neoplasms: a review of the literature. II. Laboratory detection. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1984; 39:329–345.
25. Fenoglio CM, Ferenczy A, Richart RM. Mucinous tumors of the ovary. Ultrastructural studies of mucinous cystadenomas with histogenetic considerations. Cancer. 1975; 36:1709–1722.
26. Gall SA, Walling J, Pearl J. Demonstration of tumor-associated antigens in human gynecologic malignancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 115:387–393.
Article
27. Hogdall EV, Christensen L, Kjaer SK, Blaakaer J, Jarle Christensen I, Gayther S, et al. Protein expression levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in Danish ovarian cancer patients: from the Danish 'MALOVA'ovarian cancer study. Pathology. 2008; 40:487–492.
28. Tholander B, Taube A, Lindgren A, Sjoberg O, Stendahl U, Tamsen L. Pretreatment serum levels of CA-125, carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and placental alkaline phosphatase in patients with ovarian carcinoma: influence of histological type, grade of differentiation, and clinical stage of disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1990; 39:26–33.
Article
29. Yabushita H, Masuda T, Ogawa A, Noguchi M, Ishihara M. Combination assay of CA125, TPA, IAP, CEA, and ferritin in serum for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1988; 29:66–75.
Article
30. Wu JT, Miya T, Knight JA, Knight DP. Improved specificity of the CA 125 enzyme immunoassay for ovarian carcinomas by use of the ratio of CA 125 to carcinoembryonic antigen. Clin Chem. 1988; 34:1853–1857.
Article