Korean J healthc assoc Infect Control Prev.  2018 Jun;23(1):1-7. 10.14192/kjhaicp.2018.23.1.1.

Kinetic Studies and Infection Control of Respiratory Viruses

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sung@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

The importance of infection control has been increasingly recognized after the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreak in Korea. Infection management guidelines are based on viral pathway and kinetic studies. Viral kinetics is, in a broad sense, defined as the change rate of the virus over time after an infection and in a narrow sense, as a mathematical model that describes viral kinetics. Based on the results of these kinetic studies, the life cycle and viral infection can be understood and utilized to treat and manage infections. To control viral infection, viral shedding and its transmission should be properly understood. Classically, the mode of transmission can be divided into airborne, droplet, and contact transmissions. Based on viral shedding and transmission, the guidelines are established, which can be largely divided into standard, contact, droplet, and airborne precautions and isolation. For influenza virus or rhinovirus infection, standard and droplet precautions are applied. For parainfluenza virus or respiratory syncytial virus infection, standard and contact precautions are applied. For MERS coronavirus, standard, contact, and droplet precautions are required with isolation of patients and contacted people. Kindly check if suggested revision retained your intended meaning. The types of specimens widely varies, and due to mucus and different host immune status, the exact quantification is difficult. Despite these limitations, kinetic studies on respiratory viruses have been actively studied, and efforts to efficiently manage infections by conducting various studies are continuously required.

Keyword

Precaution; Respiratory virus; Viral kinetics; Viral shedding

MeSH Terms

Coronavirus
Coronavirus Infections
Humans
Infection Control*
Kinetics
Korea
Life Cycle Stages
Models, Theoretical
Mucus
Orthomyxoviridae
Paramyxoviridae Infections
Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
Rhinovirus
Virus Shedding

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Basic viral kinetic model. Infected cells (I), target cells (T) and virus (V) are the main components of viral kinetic model. New virions are produced at rate p, and die at rate δ. Free virions are cleared at rate c per virion. Although not shown, target cells are produced with rate λ and die with rate d per cell.


Cited by  1 articles

Proposal of the Autopsy Guideline for Infectious Diseases: Preparation for the Post-COVID-19 Era (abridged translation)
Moon-Young Kim, Harin Cheong, Hyung-Seok Kim,
J Korean Med Sci. 2020;35(33):e310.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e310.


Reference

1. Smith AM, Perelson AS. Influenza A virus infection kinetics: quantitative data and models. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2011; 3:429–445.
Article
2. Perelson AS. Modelling viral and immune system dynamics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002; 2:28–36.
Article
3. Jones RM, Brosseau LM. Aerosol transmission of infectious disease. J Occup Environ Med. 2015; 57:501–508.
Article
4. Wei J, Li Y. Airborne spread of infectious agents in the indoor environment. Am J Infect Control. 2016; 44 9 Suppl:S102–S108.
Article
5. Karim YG, Ijaz MK, Sattar SA, Johnson-Lussenburg CM. Effect of relative humidity on the airborne survival of rhinovirus-14. Can J Microbiol. 1985; 31:1058–1061.
Article
6. Miller WS, Artenstein MS. Aerosol stability of three acute respiratory disease viruses. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1967; 125:222–227.
Article
7. Hall CB. The spread of influenza and other respiratory viruses: complexities and conjectures. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 45:353–359.
Article
8. KCDC. Guidelines for prevention and control of healthcare associated infections. Cheongju: KCDC; 2017.
9. Baccam P, Beauchemin C, Macken CA, Hayden FG, Perelson AS. Kinetics of influenza A virus infection in humans. J Virol. 2006; 80:7590–7599.
Article
10. Breban R, Riou J, Fontanet A. Interhuman transmissibility of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: estimation of pandemic risk. Lancet. 2013; 382:694–699.
Article
11. Wright PF, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y. Orthomyxoviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013. pp. 1186-1243.
12. Baek JH, Seo YB, Choi WS, Kee SY, Jeong HW, Lee HY, et al. Guideline on the prevention and control of seasonal influenza in healthcare setting. Korean J Med. 2014; 86:377–397.
Article
13. Karron RA, Collins PL. Parainfluenza viruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013. pp. 996-1023.
14. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, book M, Chiarello L. Committee HICPA. In: 2007 Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. Atlanta, GA: Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2007.
15. Collins PL, Karron RA. Respiratory syncytial virus and metapneumovirus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013. pp. 1086-1123.
16. Wright PF, Gruber WC, Peters M, Reed G, Zhu Y, Robinson F, et al. Illness severity, viral shedding, and antibody responses in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus. J Infect Dis. 2002; 185:1011–1018.
Article
17. Gern JE, Palmenberg AC. Rhinoviruses. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2013. pp. 531-549.
18. Mosser AG, Vrtis R, Burchell L, Lee WM, Dick CR, Weisshaar E, et al. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of rhinovirus infection in bronchial tissues. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005; 171:645–651.
Article
19. Hall CB, Douglas RG Jr, Geiman JM. Respiratory syncytial virus infections in infants: quantitation and duration of shedding. J Pediatr. 1976; 89:11–15.
Article
20. Min CK, Cheon S, Ha NY, Sohn KM, Kim Y, Aigerim A, et al. Comparative and kinetic analysis of viral shedding and immunological responses in MERS patients representing a broad spectrum of disease severity. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:25359.
Article
21. Assiri A, McGeer A, Perl TM, Price CS, Al Rabeeah AA, Cummings DA, et al. Hospital outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:407–416.
Article
22. Choi S, Jung E, Choi BY, Hur YJ, Ki M. High reproduction number of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in nosocomial outbreaks: mathematical modelling in Saudi Arabia and South Korea. J Hosp Infect. 2018; 99:162–168.
Article
23. Zhang XS, Pebody R, Charlett A, de Angelis D, Birrell P, Kang H, et al. Estimating and modelling the transmissibility of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus during the 2015 outbreak in the Republic of Korea. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017; 11:434–444.
Article
24. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC). 2017 MERS response guidelines. Cheongju: KCDC; 2017.
25. Chen SC, Chio CP, Jou LJ, Liao CM. Viral kinetics and exhaled droplet size affect indoor transmission dynamics of influenza infection. Indoor Air. 2009; 19:401–413.
Article
26. Sung H. Kinetics and infection control of respiratory viruses; Korean Journal of Nosocomial Infection Control, the 21st Conference; 2016 May 27; Seoul, Korea.
Full Text Links
  • KJHAICP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr