Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2018 May;22(2):159-163. 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.159.

Long term recurrence in primary liver neuroendocrine tumor: Report of a single case and review of literature

Affiliations
  • 1General and Emergency Surgery Department, Angelo Hospital, Venice, Italy. giovanni.pirozzolo@gmail.com
  • 2University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
  • 3General Surgery Department, Regional Hospital Peja, Peja, Kosovo.

Abstract

Primary liver neuroendocrine tumors (PLNETs) are rare tumors of the liver. They share some common characteristics with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the extrahepatic bile ducts, such as slow rise, hormonal, and histological features. Nevertheless, they possess some peculiarities and the major feature is the difference in the metastatic potential between PLNETs and NETs. PLNETs have less metastatic potential compared with NETs, which is the main factor based on which differential diagnosis between the two groups is achieved. There exists few reports disease's long-term outcome, especially about the recurrences management. We report the case of a 52-year-old woman admitted to hospital for jaundice and presence of liver mass. She underwent extended right hepatectomy and subsequently, PLNET was revealed. After 9 years, a new mass was discovered in the remnant liver, far from the resection line, and was surgically removed. Histological examination confirmed a PLNET recurrence. The patient is alive and doing well after a year of surgery. We conducted a review of the literature on recurrent PLNETS. Five papers followed our inclusion criteria and included 10 patients. Clinical presentation was mostly nonspecific in included cases and no carcinoid syndrome was reported. Median overall survival and median disease-free survival periods were 22 and 5 months, respectively. The primary disease was treated with surgical resection in all the included cases and recurrent diseases were mostly treated with non-surgical techniques (mainly transarterial chemoembolization). In conclusion, more studies should be conducted in order to have significant data about this uncommon neoplasm. Finally, considering the lack of data on long-term outcome, a long and accurate follow-up should be considered.

Keyword

Carcinoid tumor; Neuroendocrine tumor; Liver neoplasms; Neoplasm recurrence, local

MeSH Terms

Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic
Carcinoid Tumor
Diagnosis, Differential
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hepatectomy
Humans
Jaundice
Liver Neoplasms
Liver*
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neuroendocrine Tumors*
Recurrence*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Computed tomography scan portal phase. The scan shows an hypodense lesion of the segment V and IVb (T) involving the right branch of the portal vein. There is a slight enlargement of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The main trunk of the portal vein is patent. Based on imaging, an extended right hepatectomy was planned to remove the tumor.

  • Fig. 2 Photograph of the resected specimen after extended right hepatectomy. The segment IVa was spared. V: stump of the right hepatic vein. P: right portal pedicle. T: tumor. The gallbladder was left on site, and the tumor appears on the surface of the liver in the floor of segment V.

  • Fig. 3 Magnetic resonance imaging finding of T2 weighted scan 9 years after the first resection. A hyper intense lesion involving segment III and part of segment II is evident on T2 phase. The tumor is in close relationship with the left portal branch. A portal branch for segment II is involved in the tumor, as well as the distal part of the left hepatic vein. The neoplasm goes toward the caudate lobe.

  • Fig. 4 Intraoperative finding of non-anatomical liver resection. The intraoperative picture shows the liver remnant and the section plan. The main left portal branch was left, and its branch for segment II tied at its origin. In the right side the stumps of the resected distal left hepatic vein are shown.


Reference

1. Caplin ME, Buscombe JR, Hilson AJ, Jones AL, Watkinson AF, Burroughs AK. Carcinoid tumour. Lancet. 1998; 352:799–805.
Article
2. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Tsuji A, Korogi Y, Uozumi H, Kimura Y. Primary carcinoid tumor of the liver: a case report. J Comput Tomogr. 1986; 10:313–317.
Article
3. Lawrence B, Gustafsson BI, Chan A, Svejda B, Kidd M, Modlin IM. The epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011; 40:1–18. vii
Article
4. Modlin IM, Oberg K, Chung DC, Jensen RT, de Herder WW, Thakker RV, et al. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9:61–72.
Article
5. Hirabayashi K, Zamboni G, Nishi T, Tanaka A, Kajiwara H, Nakamura N. Histopathology of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms. Front Oncol. 2013; 3:2.
Article
6. Gravante G, De Liguori Carino N, Overton J, Manzia TM, Orlando G. Primary carcinoids of the liver: a review of symptoms, diagnosis and treatments. Dig Surg. 2008; 25:364–368.
Article
7. Zhang A, Xiang J, Zhang M, Zheng S. Primary hepatic carcinoid tumours: clinical features with an emphasis on carcinoid syndrome and recurrence. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36:848–859.
Article
8. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Geneva: World Health Organization;2010.
9. Kano Y, Kakinuma S, Goto F, Azuma S, Nishimura-Sakurai Y, Itsui Y, et al. Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma with a cholangiocellular carcinoma component in one nodule. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2014; 7:449–454.
Article
10. Ichiki M, Nishida N, Furukawa A, Kanasaki S, Ohta S, Miki Y. Imaging findings of primary hepatic carcinoid tumor with an emphasis on MR imaging: case study. SpringerPlus. 2014; 3:607.
Article
11. Yalav O, Ülkü A, Akçam TA, Demiryürek H, Doran F. Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumor: five cases with different preoperative diagnoses. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012; 23:272–278.
Article
12. Gao J, Hu Z, Wu J, Bai L, Chai X. Primary hepatic carcinoid tumor. World J Surg Oncol. 2011; 9:151.
Article
13. Huang YQ, Xu F, Yang JM, Huang B. Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: clinical analysis of 11 cases. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010; 9:44–48.
14. Onaitis MW, Kirshbom PM, Hayward TZ, Quayle FJ, Feldman JM, Seigler HF, et al. Gastrointestinal carcinoids: characterization by site of origin and hormone production. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:549–556.
Article
15. Akerström G, Hellman P, Hessman O, Osmak L. Management of midgut carcinoids. J Surg Oncol. 2005; 89:161–169.
16. Fenwick SW, Wyatt JI, Toogood GJ, Lodge JP. Hepatic resection and transplantation for primary carcinoid tumors of the liver. Ann Surg. 2004; 239:210–219.
Article
17. Park CH, Chung JW, Jang SJ, Chung MJ, Bang S, Park SW, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 27:1306–1311.
Article
18. Sioutos N, Virta S, Kessimian N. Primary hepatic carcinoid tumor. An electron microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Am J Clin Pathol. 1991; 95:172–175.
Article
19. Kehagias D, Moulopoulos L, Smirniotis V, Pafiti A, Ispanopoulos S, Vlahos L. Imaging findings in primary carcinoid tumour of the liver with gastrin production. Br J Radiol. 1999; 72:207–209.
Article
20. Nishimori H, Tsuji K, Miyamoto N, Sakurai Y, Mitsui S, Kang JH, et al. Recurrence of primary hepatic carcinoid tumor in the remnant liver 13 yr after resection. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005; 35:147–151.
Article
21. Knox CD, Anderson CD, Lamps LW, Adkins RB, Pinson CW. Long-term survival after resection for primary hepatic carcinoid tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10:1171–1175.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr