Clin Orthop Surg.  2017 Mar;9(1):116-125. 10.4055/cios.2017.9.1.116.

Outcome after Surgery for Metastases to the Pelvic Bone: A Single Institutional Experience

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. hik19@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The pelvic bone is the most common site of bone metastases following the axial skeleton. Surgery on the pelvic bone is a demanding procedure. Few studies have been published on the surgical outcomes of metastasis to the pelvic bone with only small numbers of patients involved. This study sought to analyze the complications, local progression and survival after surgery for metastasis to the pelvic bone on a larger cohort of patients.
METHODS
We analyzed 83 patients who underwent surgery for metastases to the pelvic bone between the years 2000 and 2015. There were 41 men and 42 women with a mean age of 55 years. Possible factors that might be associated with complications, local progression and survival were investigated with regard to patient demographics and disease-related and treatment-related variables.
RESULTS
The overall complication rate was 16% (13/83). Advanced age (> 55 years, p = 0.034) and low preoperative serum albumin levels (≤ 39 g/L, p = 0.001) were associated with increased complication rates. In patients with periacetabular disease, the complication rate was higher in those who underwent total hip replacement arthroplasty (THR) than those who did not (p = 0.030). Local progression rate was 46% (37/83). The overall median time to local progression was 26 ± 14.3 months. The median time from local progression to death was 13 months (range, 0 to 81 months). The local progression-free survival was 52.6% ± 6.4% at 2 years and 36.4%± 7.6% at 5 years, respectively. Presence of skip lesions (p = 0.017) and presence of visceral metastasis (p = 0.027) were found to be significantly associated with local progression. The median survival of all patients was 24 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 52.5% ± 5.9% and 35.6% ± 6%, respectively. Metastasis from the kidney, breast, or thyroid or of hematolymphoid origin (p = 0.014), absence of visceral metastasis (p = 0.017) and higher preoperative serum albumin levels (p = 0.009) were associated with a prolonged survival.
CONCLUSIONS
Advanced age and low serum albumin levels were associated with high complication rates. Local progression after surgery for metastases to the pelvic bone was affected by the presence of skip lesions, not by surgical margins. Primary cancer type, serum albumin level and visceral metastasis influenced survival.

Keyword

Pelvic bones; Neoplasm metastasis; Bone neoplasms; Surgery; Disease progression

MeSH Terms

Abdominal Neoplasms/*secondary
Acetabulum
Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
Blood Loss, Surgical
Bone Neoplasms/*secondary/*surgery/therapy
Child
Disease Progression
Disease-Free Survival
*Embolization, Therapeutic
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Margins of Excision
Metastasectomy/*adverse effects
Middle Aged
*Pelvic Bones
Postoperative Complications/*etiology
Preoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
Serum Albumin/metabolism
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Serum Albumin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier curve of local progression-free survival. The median local progression-free survival of the entire group was 26 months. The 2-year and 5-year local progression survival rates were 52.6% and 36.4%, respectively.

  • Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival. The median survival of the entire group was 24 months. The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 52.5% and 35.6%, respectively.


Reference

1. Fukutomi M, Yokota M, Chuman H, et al. Increased incidence of bone metastases in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001; 13(9):1083–1088.
Article
2. Li S, Peng Y, Weinhandl ED, et al. Estimated number of prevalent cases of metastatic bone disease in the US adult population. Clin Epidemiol. 2012; 4:87–93.
3. Kakhki VR, Anvari K, Sadeghi R, Mahmoudian AS, Torabian-Kakhki M. Pattern and distribution of bone metastases in common malignant tumors. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2013; 16(2):66–69.
Article
4. Randall RL. Metastatic bone disease: an integrated approach to patient care. New York, NY: Springer;2016.
5. Wood TJ, Racano A, Yeung H, Farrokhyar F, Ghert M, Deheshi BM. Surgical management of bone metastases: quality of evidence and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(13):4081–4089.
Article
6. Nilsson J, Gustafson P, Fornander P, Ornstein E. The Harrington reconstruction for advanced periacetabular metastatic destruction: good outcome in 32 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71(6):591–596.
Article
7. Quinn RH, Drenga J. Perioperative morbidity and mortality after reconstruction for metastatic tumors of the proximal femur and acetabulum. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(2):227–232.
Article
8. Wunder JS, Ferguson PC, Griffin AM, Pressman A, Bell RS. Acetabular metastases: planning for reconstruction and review of results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 415 Suppl. S187–S197.
Article
9. Marco RA, Sheth DS, Boland PJ, Wunder JS, Siegel JA, Healey JH. Functional and oncological outcome of acetabular reconstruction for the treatment of metastatic disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(5):642–651.
Article
10. Kunisada T, Choong PF. Major reconstruction for periacetabular metastasis: early complications and outcome following surgical treatment in 40 hips. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71(6):585–590.
Article
11. Ji T, Guo W, Yang RL, Tang S, Sun X. Clinical outcome and quality of life after surgery for peri-acetabular metastases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(8):1104–1110.
Article
12. Sorensen MS, Gerds TA, Hindso K, Petersen MM. Prediction of survival after surgery due to skeletal metastases in the extremities. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98(2):271–277.
13. Bauer HC, Wedin R. Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases: prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995; 66(2):143–146.
Article
14. Dindo D, Clavien PA. What is a surgical complication? World J Surg. 2008; 32(6):939–941.
Article
15. Bickels J, Dadia S, Lidar Z. Surgical management of metastatic bone disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(6):1503–1516.
Article
16. Giurea A, Ritschl P, Windhager R, Kaider A, Helwig U, Kotz R. The benefits of surgery in the treatment of pelvic metastases. Int Orthop. 1997; 21(5):343–348.
Article
17. Puri A, Pruthi M, Gulia A. Outcomes after limb sparing resection in primary malignant pelvic tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014; 40(1):27–33.
Article
18. Ruggieri P, Mavrogenis AF, Angelini A, Mercuri M. Metastases of the pelvis: does resection improve survival? Orthopedics. 2011; 34(7):e236–e244.
Article
19. Goh SL, De Silva RP, Dhital K, Gett RM. Is low serum albumin associated with postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal malignancies? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015; 20(1):107–113.
Article
20. Gohil R, Rishi M, Tan BH. Pre-operative serum albumin and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are associated with prolonged hospital stay following colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Med Med Res. 2014; 4(1):481–487.
Article
21. Han I, Lee YM, Cho HS, Oh JH, Lee SH, Kim HS. Outcome after surgical treatment of pelvic sarcomas. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010; 2(3):160–166.
Article
22. Wirbel RJ, Schulte M, Mutschler WE. Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcomas: oncologic and functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (390):190–205.
23. Pring ME, Weber KL, Unni KK, Sim FH. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: a review of sixty-four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(11):1630–1642.
24. Fottner A, Szalantzy M, Wirthmann L, et al. Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma: patient survival after surgical treatment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:145.
Article
25. Langerhuizen DW, Janssen SJ, van der Vliet QM, et al. Metastasectomy, intralesional resection, or stabilization only in the treatment of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114(2):237–245.
Article
26. Enneking WF, Kagan A. The implications of “skip” metastases in osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975; (111):33–41.
Article
27. Kager L, Zoubek A, Kastner U, et al. Skip metastases in osteosarcoma: experience of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(10):1535–1541.
Article
28. Yasko AW, Rutledge J, Lewis VO, Lin PP. Disease- and recurrence-free survival after surgical resection of solitary bone metastases of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 459:128–132.
Article
29. Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J. 2010; 9:69.
Article
30. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Hansen BH, et al. Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110(4):360–365.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr