Healthc Inform Res.  2017 Oct;23(4):304-313. 10.4258/hir.2017.23.4.304.

Satisfaction with Paper-Based Dental Records and Perception of Electronic Dental Records among Dental Professionals in Myanmar

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Tropical Hygiene (Biomedical and Health Informatics), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. wirichada.pan@mahidol.ac.th
  • 2Health Systems Research Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
  • 3Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
To overcome challenges in the implementation of electronic dental record systems in a low-resource setting, it is crucial to know the level of users' satisfaction with the existing system of paper-based dental records and their perceptions of electronic dental records.
METHODS
A cross-sectional paper-based questionnaire survey was conducted among Myanmar dental professionals who worked in one of two teaching hospitals or in private dental clinics. Descriptive data were analyzed and regression analysis was carried out to identify factors influencing perceptions of electronic dental records.
RESULTS
Most dental professionals (>60%) were satisfied with just three out of six aspects of paper-based dental records (familiarity, flexibility, and portability). In addition, generalized positive perceptions were found among decision makers towards electronic dental records, and 86% of dentists indicated that they were willing to use them. Financial concerns were identified as the most important barrier to the implementation of electronic dental records among dentists who were not willing to use the proposed system.
CONCLUSIONS
The first step towards implementing electronic dental records in Myanmar should be improvement of the content and structure of paper-based dental records, especially in private dental clinics. Utilization of appropriate open-source electronic dental record software in private dental clinics is recommended to address perceived issues around financial barriers. For the long term, we recommend providing further education and training in health informatics to healthcare professionals to facilitate the efficient use of electronic dental record software in Myanmar in the future.

Keyword

Electronic Dental Records; Myanmar; Perceptions; Paper-based Dental Records; User Satisfaction

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Dental Clinics
Dental Records*
Dentists
Education
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Informatics
Myanmar*
Pliability

Figure

  • Figure 1 Conceptual framework.


Cited by  1 articles

User Acceptance of Electronic Medical Record System: Implementation at Marie Stopes International, Myanmar
Win Min Thit, Sai Wai Yan Myint Thu, Jaranit Kaewkungwal, Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri, Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, Boonchai Kijsanayotin, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Sid Naing, Wirichada Pan-ngum
Healthc Inform Res. 2020;26(3):185-192.    doi: 10.4258/hir.2020.26.3.185.


Reference

1. World Health Organization. Electronic Health Records: a manual for developing countries. Manila: Regional Office for the Western Pacific, World Health Organization;2006.
2. Jathanna VR, Jathanna RV, Jathanna R. The awareness and attitudes of students of one indian dental school toward information technology and its use to improve patient care. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2014; 27(3):293–296.
Article
3. Thit WM, Kaewkungwal J, Soonthornworasiri N, Theera-Ampornpunt N, Kijsanayotin B, Lawpoolsri S, et al. Electronic medical records in Myanmar: user perceptions at Marie Stopes International Clinics in Myanmar. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2016; 47(4):799–809.
4. American Dental Association. Survey of dental practice 2003 special report. Chicago (IL): American Dental Association Survey Center;2006.
5. Layman EJ. Ethical issues and the electronic health record. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2008; 27(2):165–176.
Article
6. Bernat JL. Ethical and quality pitfalls in electronic health records. Neurology. 2013; 80(11):1057–1061.
Article
7. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. Institute of Medicine. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academies Press;2000.
8. Khalifa M. Barriers to health information systems and electronic medical records implementation: a field study of Saudi Arabian hospitals. Procedia Comput Sci. 2013; 21:335–342.
Article
9. Iversen TB, Landmark AD, Tjora A. The peace of paper: patient lists as work tools. Int J Med Inform. 2015; 84(1):69–75.
Article
10. van der Zande MM, Gorter RC, Wismeijer D. Dental practitioners and a digital future: an initial exploration of barriers and incentives to adopting digital technologies. Br Dent J. 2013; 215(11):E21.
Article
11. Wikipedia. Technology acceptance model [Internet]. [place unknown]: Wikipedia;c2017. cited at 2017 Oct 1. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_acceptance_model.
12. Tange HJ. The paper-based patient record: is it really so bad? Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1995; 48(1-2):127–131.
Article
13. Surendran P. Technology acceptance model: a survey of literature. Int J Bus Soc Res. 2012; 2(4):175–178.
14. Holden RJ, Karsh BT. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010; 43(1):159–172.
Article
15. Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In : Proceedings of Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education; 2003 Oct 8-10; Columbus, OH.
16. Santos JR. Cronbach's alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. J Ext. 1999; 37(2):1–5.
17. Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2:53–55.
Article
18. Munyisia EN, Yu P, Hailey D. The changes in caregivers' perceptions about the quality of information and benefits of nursing documentation associated with the introduction of an electronic documentation system in a nursing home. Int J Med Inform. 2011; 80(2):116–126.
Article
19. Powell V, Din FM, Acharya A, Torres-Urquidy MH. Integration of medical and dental care and patient data. London: Springer;2012.
20. Flores-Mir C, Palmer NG, Northcott HC, Khurshed F, Major PW. Perceptions and attitudes of Canadian dentists toward digital and electronic technologies. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72(3):243.
21. Park YT, Han D. Current status of electronic medical record systems in hospitals and clinics in Korea. Healthc Inform Res. 2017; 23(3):189–198.
Article
22. Mostafa AA, Almasari FS, Sadek KW, Alshehri RH, Abduljabbar SM, Alqahtani YS. Evaluation of students’ perception in using electronic dental records. Saudi J Oral Sci. 2015; 2(1):14–18.
Article
23. John JH, Thomas D, Richards D. Questionnaire survey on the use of computerisation in dental practices across the Thames Valley Region. Br Dent J. 2003; 195(10):585–590.
Article
24. Kwak ES, Chang H. Medical representatives’ intention to use information technology in pharmaceutical marketing. Healthc Inform Res. 2016; 22(4):342–350.
Article
25. Schleyer TK, Thyvalikakath TP, Spallek H, Torres-Urquidy MH, Hernandez P, Yuhaniak J. Clinical computing in general dentistry. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(3):344–352.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr