1. Chen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126:12–21. PMID:
26241251.
2. Raymond EG, Shannon C, Weaver MA, Winikoff B. First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review. Contraception. 2013; 87:26–37. PMID:
22898359.
Article
3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123:676–692. PMID:
24553166.
4. Blum J, Raghavan S, Dabash R, Ngoc Nt, Chelli H, Hajri S, et al. Comparison of misoprostol-only and combined mifepristone-misoprostol regimens for home-based early medical abortion in Tunisia and Vietnam. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 118:166–171. PMID:
22682768.
Article
5. Jain JK, Dutton C, Harwood B, Meckstroth KR, Mishell DR Jr. A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:1477–1482. PMID:
12042265.
Article
6. von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Huong NT, Arustamyan K, Cabezas E, Gomez M, et al. Efficacy of two intervals and two routes of administration of misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2007; 369:1938–1946. PMID:
17560446.
Article
7. Henshaw RC, Naji SA, Russell IT, Templeton AA. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment. BMJ. 1993; 307:714–717. PMID:
8401094.
Article
8. Creinin MD. Randomized comparison of efficacy, acceptability and cost of medical versus surgical abortion. Contraception. 2000; 62:117–124. PMID:
11124358.
Article
9. Teal SB, Dempsey-Fanning A, Westhoff C. Predictors of acceptability of medication abortion. Contraception. 2007; 75:224–229. PMID:
17303494.
Article
10. Lavecchia M, Abenhaim HA. Effect of menstrual age on failure of medical management in women with early pregnancy loss. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015; 37:617–623. PMID:
26366818.
Article
11. Creinin MD, Spitz IM. Use of various ultrasonographic criteria to evaluate the efficacy of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181:1419–1424. PMID:
10601923.
Article
12. Schreiber CA, Ratcliffe SJ, Quinley KE, Miller C, Sammel MD. Serum biomarkers may help predict successful misoprostol management of early pregnancy failure. Reprod Biol. 2015; 15:79–85. PMID:
26051455.
Article
13. Chien LW, Liu WM, Tzeng CR, Au HK. Effect of previous live birth and prior route of delivery on the outcome of early medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113:669–674. PMID:
19300333.
Article
14. Bartley J, Tong S, Everington D, Baird DT. Parity is a major determinant of success rate in medical abortion: a retrospective analysis of 3161 consecutive cases of early medical abortion treated with reduced doses of mifepristone and vaginal gemeprost. Contraception. 2000; 62:297–303. PMID:
11239616.
Article