Imaging Sci Dent.  2017 Sep;47(3):209-213. 10.5624/isd.2017.47.3.209.

Central giant cell lesion of the mandible in a 2-year old girl

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, The Nippon Dental University Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan. oda@ngt.ndu.ac.jp
  • 2Department of Pathology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan.

Abstract

Central giant cell lesions are rare, benign, osteolytic, pseudocystic, solitary, localized lesions that are common in the skeletal structure, but less so in the maxillofacial region. Furthermore, to perform panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography, it is necessary to prepare patients properly and to position their heads carefully. However, this can be difficult in pediatric patients, who may be anxious. In this report, we describe the case of a central giant cell lesion of the mandible in a 2-year-old girl that was evaluated with multidetector computed tomography.

Keyword

Granuloma, Giant Cell; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Mandible; Child

MeSH Terms

Child
Child, Preschool
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Female*
Giant Cells*
Granuloma, Giant Cell
Head
Humans
Mandible*
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Radiography, Panoramic

Figure

  • Fig. 1 A clinical intraoral photograph shows an extracted tooth wound in the central area.

  • Fig. 2 A periapical radiograph shows root resorption of the left mandibular lateral deciduous incisor of the mandible.

  • Fig. 3 Axial soft-tissue algorithm CT images (A and B) show a mass lesion along the central area (arrow). Bone-tissue algorithm CT images (C and D) show an expansile lesion with an irregular and fairly well-defined area in the central area (arrow). CT, computed tomography.

  • Fig. 4 Multiplanar panoramic (A) and cross-sectional (B-D) reformation images more clearly demonstrate the root resorption of the left mandibular lateral deciduous incisor of the mandible and an expansile lesion in the central area (arrow).

  • Fig. 5 A and B. The multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells are embedded in a fibrous stroma comprising oval to spindle-shaped cells around the region of hemorrhage. C. Positive immunohistochemical staining for CD68.


Reference

1. Kulkarni D, Shetty L, Kulkarni M, Mahajan B. Extensive giant cell tumour of the mandible: a case report with review. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 12:461–465.
Article
2. Rapidis AD, Vallianatou D, Apostolidis C, Lagogiannis G. Large lytic lesion of the ascending ramus, the condyle, and the infratemporal region. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62:996–1001.
Article
3. Rastogi S, Prashanth I, Khan SA, Trikha V, Mittal R. Giant cell tumor of bone: is curettage the answer? Indian J Orthop. 2007; 41:109–114.
Article
4. Baena-Ocampo Ldel C, Ramirez-Perez E, Linares-Gonzalez LM, Delgado-Chavez R. Epidemiology of bone tumors in Mexico City: retrospective clinicopathologic study of 566 patients at a referral institution. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009; 13:16–21.
5. Jaffe HL. Giant-cell reparative granuloma, traumatic bone cyst, and fibrous (fibro-osseous) dysplasia of the jawbones. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1953; 6:159–175.
Article
6. Dyalram D, Aslam-Pervez N, Lubek JE. Nonodontogenic tumors of the jaws. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016; 28:59–65.
Article
7. Fletcher CD, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PC P, Mertens F. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press;2013. p. 319–324.
8. Edwards PC. Insight into the pathogenesis and nature of central giant cell lesions of the jaws. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20:e196–e198.
Article
9. Waldron CA, Shafer WG. The central giant cell reparative granuloma of the jaws. An analysis of 38 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966; 45:437–447.
Article
10. Zheng MH, Fan Y, Smith A, Wysocki S, Papadimitriou JM, Wood DJ. Gene expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in giant cell tumors of bone osteoclastoma: possible involvement in CD68+ macrophage-like cell migration. J Cell Biochem. 1998; 70:121–129.
Article
11. Roux S, Amazit L, Meduri G, Guiochon-Mantel A, Milgrom E, Mariette X. RANK (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B) and RANK ligand are expressed in giant cell tumors of bone. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 117:210–216.
Article
12. Lindeman JH, Hanemaaijer R, Mulder A, Dijkstra PD, Szuhai K, Bromme D, et al. Cathepsin K is the principal protease in giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Pathol. 2004; 165:593–600.
Article
13. Dickson BC, Li SQ, Wunder JS, Ferguson PC, Eslami B, Werier JA, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone express p63. Mod Pathol. 2008; 21:369–375.
Article
14. Lee CH, Espinosa I, Jensen KC, Subramanian S, Zhu SX, Varma S, et al. Gene expression profiling identifies p63 as a diagnostic marker for giant cell tumor of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2008; 21:531–539.
Article
15. Hammas N, Laila C, Youssef AL, Hindel F, Harmouch T, Siham T, et al. Can p63 serve as a biomarker for giant cell tumor of bone? A Moroccan experience. Diagn Pathol. 2012; 7:130.
Article
16. Jadu FM, Pharoah MJ, Lee L, Baker GI, Allidina A. Central giant cell granuloma of the mandibular condyle: a case report and review of the literature. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40:60–64.
Article
17. Mohan RP, Verma S, Agarwal N, Singh U. Central giant cell granuloma: a case report. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 2013:pii: bcr2013009903.
Article
18. Park SY, Kim JY, Chang KH, Kim TJ. Giant cell tumor of the temporal bone presenting as a preauricular bulging mass. Oral Radiol. 2016; 32:56–60.
Article
19. Qureshi SS, Puri A, Agarwal M, Desai S, Jambhekar N. Recurrent giant cell tumor of bone with simultaneous regional lymph node and pulmonary metastases. Skeletal Radiol. 2005; 34:225–228.
Article
20. Zorlu F, Selek U, Soylemezoglu F, Oge K. Malignant giant cell tumor of the skull base originating from clivus and sphenoid bone. J Neurooncol. 2006; 76:149–152.
Article
21. Patel R, Reid RR, Poon CS. Multidetector computed tomography of maxillofacial fractures: the key to high-impact radiological reporting. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2012; 33:410–417.
Article
22. Ogura I, Sasaki Y, Kaneda T. Analysis of mandibular condylar and glenoid fossa fractures with computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24:902–906.
Article
23. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96:508–513.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ISD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr