J Pathol Transl Med.  2015 Jan;49(1):30-36. 10.4132/jptm.2014.10.23.

Clinical and Prognostic Significances of Cytokeratin 19 and KIT Expression in Surgically Resectable Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea. smhong28@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Pathology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are malignant endocrine neoplasms that present diverse clinical behaviors. Therefore, identification of biomarkers of PanNETs is important for stratification of the prognosis of PanNET patients. Recently, cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and KIT expression were reported to have prognostic significance in PanNET patients.
METHODS
To identify their prognostic significance, CK19 and KIT protein expression were assessed in 182 surgically resected PanNETs and compared with clinicopathologic factors.
RESULTS
Of 182 PanNETs cases, CK19 and KIT expression was noted in 97 (53.3%) and 16 (8.8%) cases, respectively. PanNET patients with CK19 expression had larger tumors (p=.006), higher World Health Organization (WHO) grade (p=.002) and pT classification (p<.001), increased distant metastasis (p=.004), and lymphovascular (p=.012) and perineural (p=.019) invasion. Similarly, those with KIT expression had larger tumors (p=.030), higher WHO grade (p=.001), advanced pT classification (p<.001), distant metastasis (p=.001), and lymphovascular invasion (p=.014). The 5-year survival rate for PanNET patients with KIT expression was significantly lower (62%) than that of patients without KIT expression (77%, p=.011), as determined by univariate but not by multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
CK19 and KIT expression correlate with higher metastatic potential and advanced disease stage, and KIT expression is associated with worse survival in PanNET patients.

Keyword

Pancreas; Neuroendocrine tumors; Keratin-19; KIT; Immunohistochemistry

MeSH Terms

Biomarkers
Classification
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Keratin-19*
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neuroendocrine Tumors*
Pancreas
Prognosis
Survival Rate
World Health Organization
Keratin-19

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Representative images of KIT and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) staining. (A) Normal acinar cell, ductal epithelial cells, and islet cells (arrows) of the pancreas are negative for KIT staining, while mast cells in the pancreatic parenchyma are positive for KIT staining. (B) Membranous CK19 immunolabeling is noted in the normal centroacinar cell and the ductal epithelial cells, while islet cells are not stained. Negative (C) and positive (D) KIT expression in a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. (E) Negative CK19 expression is observed in a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, while entrapped normal pancreatic ductal cells are positive for CK19. (F) Positive CK19 expression in a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

  • Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients according to KIT (A) and cytokeratin 19 (CK19) (B) expression status. (A) The overall 5-year survival rate for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) patients with KIT expression is significantly lower (62%) than that of patients without KIT expression (77%, p=.011). (B) The overall 5-year survival rate for PanNET patients with CK19 expression (74%) is not significantly different from that of those without CK19 expression (79%, p=.243).


Cited by  1 articles

Loss of Progesterone Receptor Expression Is an Early Tumorigenesis Event Associated with Tumor Progression and Shorter Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients
Sung Joo Kim, Soyeon An, Jae Hoon Lee, Joo Young Kim, Ki-Byung Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Song Cheol Kim, Eunsil Yu, Seung-Mo Hong
J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(4):388-395.    doi: 10.4132/jptm.2017.03.19.


Reference

1. Yao JC, Eisner MP, Leary C, et al. Population-based study of islet cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14:3492–500.
Article
2. Han X, Zhao J, Ji Y, Xu X, Lou W. Expression of CK19 and KIT in resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34:2881–9.
Article
3. Reichert M, Rustgi AK. Pancreatic ductal cells in development, regeneration, and neoplasia. J Clin Invest. 2011; 121:4572–8.
Article
4. Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Weber J, Han G, Coppola D, Kvols LK. Prognostic validity of a novel American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:3044–9.
Article
5. Jiao Y, Shi C, Edil BH, et al. DAXX/ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Science. 2011; 331:1199–203.
6. Krausch M, Raffel A, Anlauf M, et al. Loss of PTEN expression in neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors. Horm Metab Res. 2011; 43:865–71.
Article
7. Marinoni I, Kurrer AS, Vassella E, et al. Loss of DAXX and ATRX are associated with chromosome instability and reduced survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology. 2014; 146:453–60.
8. Bosnan FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press;2010.
9. Ali A, Serra S, Asa SL, Chetty R. The predictive value of CK19 and CD99 in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006; 30:1588–94.
Article
10. Jonkers YM, Claessen SM, Perren A, et al. DNA copy number status is a powerful predictor of poor survival in endocrine pancreatic tumor patients. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007; 14:769–79.
Article
11. La Rosa S, Rigoli E, Uccella S, Novario R, Capella C. Prognostic and biological significance of cytokeratin 19 in pancreatic endocrine tumours. Histopathology. 2007; 50:597–606.
Article
12. Schmitt AM, Anlauf M, Rousson V, et al. WHO 2004 criteria and CK19 are reliable prognostic markers in pancreatic endocrine tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007; 31:1677–82.
Article
13. Zhang L, Smyrk TC, Oliveira AM, et al. KIT is an independent prognostic marker for pancreatic endocrine tumors: a finding derived from analysis of islet cell differentiation markers. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33:1562–9.
14. Lennartsson J, Rönnstrand L. Stem cell factor receptor/c-Kit: from basic science to clinical implications. Physiol Rev. 2012; 92:1619–49.
Article
15. Li J, Quirt J, Do HQ, et al. Expression of c-Kit receptor tyrosine kinase and effect on beta-cell development in the human fetal pancreas. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 293:E475–83.
16. Ashman LK. The biology of stem cell factor and its receptor C-kit. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1999; 31:1037–51.
Article
17. Feng ZC, Li J, Turco BA, Riopel M, Yee SP, Wang R. Critical role of c-Kit in beta cell function: increased insulin secretion and protection against diabetes in a mouse model. Diabetologia. 2012; 55:2214–25.
Article
18. Kaligin MS, Gumerova AA, Titova MA, Andreeva DI, Sharipova ÉI, Kiiasov AP. C-kit is a marker of human pancreatic endocrinocyte stem cells. Morfologiia. 2011; 140:32–7.
19. Liu W, Chen L, Zhu J, Rodgers GP. The glycoprotein hGC-1 binds to cadherin and lectins. Exp Cell Res. 2006; 312:1785–97.
Article
20. Kimura W, Ma J, Takeshita A, et al. Analysis of c-kit protein expression in pancreatic neoplasms and its implication for prognosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007; 54:2203–8.
21. Ohike N, Sato M, Hisayuki T, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of nestin and c-kit and their significance in pancreatic tumors. Pathol Int. 2007; 57:589–93.
Article
22. Yasuda A, Sawai H, Takahashi H, et al. The stem cell factor/c-kit receptor pathway enhances proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2006; 5:46.
23. Sammarco I, Capurso G, Coppola L, et al. Expression of the protooncogene c-KIT in normal and tumor tissues from colorectal carcinoma patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004; 19:545–53.
Article
24. Heinzelmann-Schwarz VA, Nixdorf S, Valadan M, et al. A clinicopathological review of 33 patients with vulvar melanoma identifies c-KIT as a prognostic marker. Int J Mol Med. 2014; 33:784–94.
Article
25. Kurokawa Y, Matsuura N, Kawabata R, et al. Prognostic impact of major receptor tyrosine kinase expression in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21 Suppl 4:S584–90.
Article
26. Hong SM, Hwang I, Song DE, Choi J, Yu E. Clinical and prognostic significances of nuclear and cytoplasmic KIT expressions in extrahepatic bile duct carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2007; 20:562–9.
Article
27. Scobie JV, Acs G, Bandera CA, et al. C-kit immunoreactivity in endometrial adenocarcinomas and its clinicopathologic significance. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2003; 22:149–55.
Article
28. Chung CY, Yeh KT, Hsu NC, et al. Expression of c-kit protooncogene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2005; 217:231–6.
Article
29. Krams M, Parwaresch R, Sipos B, Heidorn K, Harms D, Rudolph P. Expression of the c-kit receptor characterizes a subset of neuroblastomas with favorable prognosis. Oncogene. 2004; 23:588–95.
Article
30. Piper K, Brickwood S, Turnpenny LW, et al. Beta cell differentiation during early human pancreas development. J Endocrinol. 2004; 181:11–23.
Article
31. Bouwens L, Lu WG, De Krijger R. Proliferation and differentiation in the human fetal endocrine pancreas. Diabetologia. 1997; 40:398–404.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPTM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr