J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2014;11:19. 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.19.

Assessing the reliability and validity of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in Ghanaian medical students

• Mogre V
• Amalba A

• KMID: 2380938
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.19

Abstract

PURPOSE
We investigated the validity and reliability of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in preclinical students in Ghana.
METHODS
The R-SPQ2F was administered to 189 preclinical students of the University for Development Studies, School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Both descriptive and inferential statistics with Cronbach's alpha test and factor analysis were done.
RESULTS
The mean age of the students was 22.69+/-0.18 years, 60.8% (n=115) were males and 42.3% (n=80) were in their second year of medical training. The students had higher mean deep approach scores (31.23+/-7.19) than that of surface approach scores (22.62+/-6.48). Findings of the R-SPQ2F gave credence to a solution of two-factors indicating deep and surface approaches accounting for 49.80% and 33.57%, respectively, of the variance. The scales of deep approach (Cronbach's alpha, 0.80) and surface approach (Cronbach's alpha, 0.76) and their subscales demonstrated an internal consistency that was good. The factorial validity was comparable to other studies.
CONCLUSION
Our study confirms the construct validity and internal consistency of the R-SPQ2F for measuring approaches to learning in Ghanaian preclinical students. Deep approach was the most dominant learning approach among the students. The questionnaire can be used to measure students' approaches to learning in Ghana and in other African countries.

Keyword

Learning; Statistical factor analysis; Medical students; Validity; Reproducibility of results; Ghana

MeSH Terms

Factor Analysis, Statistical
Ghana
Humans
Learning
Male
Reproducibility of Results*
Students, Medical*
Weights and Measures
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Emilia O, Bloomfield L, Rotem A. Measuring students’ approaches to learning in different clinical rotations. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12:114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-114.

2. Rajendra Kumar L, Voralu K, Pani S, Sethuraman K. Association of kinesthetic and read-write learner with deep approach learning and academic achievement. Can Med Educ J. 2011; 2:e23–e27. http://cmej.synergiesprairies.ca/cmej/index.php/cmej/article/view/45.

3. Abraham RR, Vinod P, Kamath MG, Asha K, Ramnarayan K. Learning approaches of undergraduate medical students to physiology in a non-PBL- and partially PBL-oriented curriculum. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008; 32:35–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00063.2007.

4. Biggs J, Kember D, Leung DY. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001; 71:133–149.

5. Sulaiman WS, Rahman WR, Dzulkifli MA, Sulaiman WS. Reliability of second-order factor of a revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) among university students in Malaysia. Asean J Teach Learn High Educ. 2013; 5(2):1–13.

6. Mogre V, Amalba A, Saaka M, Kyei-Aboagye K. Medical students’ achievement on the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery/Chirurgery (MBChB) part I and II licensing examination: a comparison of students in problem-based learning community-based education and service and conventional curricula in Ghana. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014; 11:10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.10.

7. Vallabh K. Psychometrics of the student version of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE-S) in final-year medical students in Johannesburg in 2008. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2011; 4:63–68. http://www.sajbl.org.za/index.php/sajbl/article/view/164/160.

8. Shankar PR, Dubey AK, Binu VS, Subish P, Deshpande VY. Learning styles of preclinical students in a medical college in western Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006; 4:390–395.

9. Munshi FM, Al-Rukban MO, Al-Hoqail I. Reliability and validity of an Arabic version of the revised two-factor study process questionnaire R-SPQ-2F. J Family Community Med. 2012; 19:33–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.94010.