J Korean Med Assoc.  2017 Apr;60(4):306-313. 10.5124/jkma.2017.60.4.306.

Strategic risk communication for infectious disease outbreaks: the evolving landscape of publics and media

• Paek HJ

• KMID: 2378214
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2017.60.4.306

Abstract

During the outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome, the Korean government responded with inadequate speed and thoroughness. As a result, serious damage occurred not only to public health, but also to socioeconomic life and public trust in the government. Although people are becoming increasingly aware that risk and crisis communications are important during infectious disease outbreaks, we still need a better understanding of what constitutes strategic risk communication. This article deals with the following issues: (1) what is risk communication? (2) During the development of risk communication strategies, how has the concept of the public been treated? (3) As the media landscape has changed, how have views of the role of the public in risk communication changed? This article traces how risk communication has moved from an expert-centered view to an audience-centered view. In the process, the concept of the public has changed from being the target of expert control to being the partner in a respectful dialogue. Strategic risk communicators need to understand how the role of the public has changed in today's diversified and fragmented media environment, where people not only consume but produce, share, and disseminate risk information. Finally, to make risk communication more effective during infectious disease outbreaks, public health experts and communication experts need to use "team science" to improve their abilities to work closely with one another as soon as outbreaks occur.

Keyword

Strategic risk communication; Crisis communication; Outbreak; Publics; Media

MeSH Terms

Communicable Diseases*
Coronavirus Infections
Disease Outbreaks*
Public Health

Reference

1. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Middle East respiratory syndrome information 2015 [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2015. cited 2017 Mar 1. Available from: http://mers.go.kr/mers/html/jsp/main.jsp.

2. Cho K, Yu J. KERI insight: estimated economic loss by MERS outbreak. Seoul: Korea Economic Research Institute;2015.

3. Seoul Metropolitan Government. 2015 White paper on preventive measures against MERS in Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Government;2015.

4. Korean Society of Epidemiology. Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of Korean Society of Epidemiology. 2015 Jun 23; Seoul, Korea. Seoul: Korean Society of Epidemiology;2015.

5. Paek HJ, Hilyard K, Freimuth VS, Barge JK, Mindlin M. Public support for government actions during a flu pandemic: lessons learned from a statewide survey. Health Promot Pract. 2008; 9:4 Suppl. 60S–72S.

6. Choi JW, Kim KH, Moon JM, Kim MS. Public health crisis response and establishment of a crisis communication system in South Korea: lessons learned from the MERS outbreak. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015; 58:624–634.

7. Covello V. Risk communication: an emerging area of health communication research. In : Deetz S, editor. Communication yearbook. London: Sage;1992. p. 359–373.

8. Walaski P. Risk and crisis communications: methods and messages. Somerset: Wiley;2011.

9. Sellnow TL, Ulmer RR, Seeger MW, Littlefield R. Effective risk communication: a message-centered approach. New York: Springer;2009.

10. Hove T, Paek HJ. Effects of risk presentation format and fear message on laypeople's risk perceptions. J Public Relat Res. 2015; 19:162–182.

11. Sandman PM, Miller PM, Johnson BB, Weinstein ND. Agency communication, community outrage, and perception of risk: three simulation experiments. Risk Anal. 1993; 13:585–598.

12. Markon MP, Crowe J, Lemyre L. Examining uncertainties in government risk communication: citizens' expectations. Health Risk Soc. 2013; 15:313–332.

13. Goldhaber GM. Organizational communication. New York: Longman;1986.

14. Coombs WT. Ongoing crisis communication: planning, managing and responding. Thousand Oaks: Sage;1999.

15. Reynolds B, Seeger M. Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. J Health Commun. 2005; 10:43–55.

16. Fischhoff B. Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Anal. 1995; 15:137–145.

17. Wahlberg AA, Sjoberg L. Risk perception and the media. J Risk Res. 2000; 3:31–50.

18. Parrott R, editor. Encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing. New York: Oxford University Press;in press.

19. Oh HJ, Hove T, Paek HJ, Lee B, Lee H, Song S. Attention cycles and the H1N1 pandemic: a cross-national study of US and Korean newspaper coverage. Asian J Comm. 2012; 22:214–232.

20. Hove T, Paek HJ, Yoon M, Jwa B. How newspapers represent environmental risk: the case of carcinogenic hazards in South Korea. J Risk Res. 2015; 18:1320–1336.

21. Entman R. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Comm. 1993; 43:6–27.

22. Dudo AD, Dahlstrom MF, Brossard D. A risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in U.S. newspapers. Sci Comm. 2007; 28:429–454.

23. Semetko HA, Valkenburg PM. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J Comm. 2000; 50:93–109.

24. Paek HJ, Cha S, Nam E, Kim D. Effects of news frames and trust in government on support for tobacco tax policy: implications for media advocacy. J Public Relat Res. 2015; 19:1–29.

25. Paek HJ, Oh SH, Hove T. How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk. Health Commun. 2016; 31:1051–1062.

26. Sandman P. Mass media and environmental risk: seven principles. In : Bate R, editor. What risk? Science, politics and public health. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann;1997. p. 275–284.

27. Gainor D, Menefee A. Avian flu: a media pandemic. Business Media. 2006. 03. 08.

28. Korea Press Foundation. Korean press yearbook 2014. Seoul: Korea Press Foundation;2014.

29. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Digital news report 2016 [Internet]. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism;2016. cited 2017 Mar 30. Available from: http://www.digitalnewsreport.org/.

30. Nielsen. Diversification of news platform and change of news consumption patterns [Internet]. Seoul: Nielsen;2016. cited 2017 Mar 2. Available from: http://www.koreanclick.com/insights/newsletter_view.html?code=topic&id=417&page=1.

31. Wendling C, Radisch J, Jacobzone S. The use of social media in risk and crisis communication [Internet]. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development;2013. cited 2017 Mar 4. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/5k3v01fskp9s-en.

32. Difonzo N, Bordia P. Rumor psychology: social and organizational approaches. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;2006.

33. Barrelet C, Bourrier M, Burton-Jeangros C, Schindler M. Unresolved issues in risk communication research: the case of the H1N1 pandemic (2009-2011). Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013; 7:Suppl 2. 114–119.

34. Cha Y, Na E. The good, the bad, or the ambivalent rumor? Validation of the online rumor spreading. J Comm Res. 2015; 52:103–166.

35. Choi Y. The effect of citizen's voluntary campaign against rumors in Internet. Korean J Commun Stud. 2010; 18:77–100.

36. Kwon G, Cho S. Effects of rumor recipient's information processing disposition, prior attitude, and prior knowledge on rumor word-of-mouth intentions. J Public Relat Res. 2017; 21:1–25.

37. Hong J, Yun H. The diffusion of rumor via twitter: the diffusion trend and the user interactivity in the Korea-U.S. FTA case. Korean J Commun Inf. 2014; 66:59–86.

38. Kim DH. Structural factors of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak as a public health crisis in Korea and future response strategies. J Prev Med Public Health. 2015; 48:265–270.