Ann Lab Med.  2017 Jul;37(4):339-342. 10.3343/alm.2017.37.4.339.

Sigma-Metrics of Electrolyte Tests From a Recently Launched New-Generation Proficiency Testing Program of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
  • 2Siemens Healthineers, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea.
  • 5Samkwang Medical Laboratories, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Green Cross Laboratories, Yongin, Korea.
  • 7Hanmi Medicare Inc., Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. phi@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

No abstract available.


Figure

  • Fig. 1 Sigma Proficiency Assessment Chart of the Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory (KAQACL) proficiency testing (PT) in 2016 for Na+ (A), K+ (B), and Cl− (C). Allowable total error (TEa) values for Na+, K+, and Cl− were 5.0%, 8.0%, and 8.0%, respectively, which were from Rili-BAEK German guidelines for quality. Six points in the same color belong to one of eight peer groups and are from each of six specimens (CC-16-01-CC-16-06). Point size is proportional to the size of the peer group.Abbreviation: ISE, ion-selective electrode.


Cited by  1 articles

Internal Quality Control Data of Urine Reagent Strip Tests and Derivation of Control Rules Based on Sigma Metrics
Haeil Park, Younsuk Ko
Ann Lab Med. 2021;41(5):447-454.    doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.5.447.


Reference

1. Korean Association of Quality Assurance for Clinical Laboratory. New Generation Proficiency Testing Program. Updated on May 2016. http://eqas.keqas.org/.
2. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Assessing quality on the Sigma scale from proficiency testing and external quality assessment surveys. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53:1531–1535. PMID: 25719323.
3. Westgard JO, Westgard SA. Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016; 53:32–50. PMID: 26150675.
4. Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations-Rili-BAEK” (unauthorized translation). J Lab Med. 2015; 39:26–69.
5. Orth M. Are regulation-driven performance criteria still acceptable? - The German point of view. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53:893–898. PMID: 25849796.
6. Westgard SA. Utilizing global data to estimate analytical performance on the Sigma scale: A global comparative analysis of methods, instruments, and manufacturers through external quality assurance and proficiency testing programs. Clin Biochem. 2016; 49:699–707. PMID: 26948097.
7. Westgard JO. Quality Requirements. Updated on Oct 2014. https://www.westgard.com/quality-requirements.htm.
Full Text Links
  • ALM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr