J Dent Anesth Pain Med.  2017 Mar;17(1):79-80. 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.79.

Authors' Reply to Letter to the Editor “Effects of airway evaluation parameters on the laryngeal view grade in mandibular prognathism and retrognathism patients”

• Karm MH
• Seo KS

• KMID: 2374729
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.1.79

Abstract

No abstract available.

Keyword

Airway; Cephalometry; Retrognathism

MeSH Terms

Cephalometry
Prognathism*
Retrognathia*

Reference

1. Karm MH, Chi SI, Kim J, Kim HJ, Seo KS, Bahk JH, et al. Effects of airway evaluation parameters on the laryngeal view grade in mandibular prognathism and retrognathism patients. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 16:185–191.

2. Chang JZ, Liu PH, Chen YJ, Yao JC, Chang HP, Chang CH, et al. Thin-plate spline analysis of the effects of face mask treatment in children with maxillary retrognathism. J Formos Med Assoc. 2006; 105:147–154.

3. van Es RJ, Wittebol-Post D, Beemer FA. Oculodentodigital dysplasia with mandibular retrognathism and absence of syndactyly: A case report with a novel mutation in the connexin 43 gene. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 36:858–860.

4. Delaire J, Schendel SA, Tulasne JF. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: A new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 52:226–238.

5. McNamara JA Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 1984; 86:449–469.

6. Badheka JP, Doshi PM, Vyas AM, Kacha NJ, Parmar VS. Comparison of upper lip bite test and ratio of height to thyromental distance with other airway assessment tests for predicting difficult endotracheal intubation. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016; 20:3–8.