J Breast Cancer.  2013 Mar;16(1):32-39.

Tumor-Associated Lymphocytes Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. gygong@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Surgery, Changwon Fatima Hospital, Changwon, Korea.
  • 3Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Tumor-associated lymphocyte numbers in breast cancer have been suggested as a new independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. We therefore evaluated the relationship between pathologic complete response (pCR) and tumor-associated lymphocytes in tumors of such patients.
METHODS
Between 2000 and 2009, we retrospectively evaluated 175 patients with primary breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by definitive surgical resection. Peritumoral lymphocytic infiltration (LI) and CD3+, CD8+, and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ lymphocytes were assessed in pretreatment biopsy specimens.
RESULTS
Nineteen (11%) patients achieved pCR. An elevated LI, CD3+, CD8+, or FOXP3+ lymphocytic infiltration; lower clinical T stage; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression; and herceptin-based treatment were all significantly associated with pCR. Through a multivariate analysis, LI (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; p=0.024), clinical T stage (OR, 3.06; p=0.041), and the use of a herceptin-based regimen (OR, 4.95; p=0.004) were all significant independent predictors of pCR. Significantly higher numbers of tumor-associated lymphocytes and CD3+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T-cells were observed in the following: high-grade tumors, tumors of positive nodal status, and tumors negative for hormone receptors.
CONCLUSION
Tumor-associated lymphocytes are significantly associated with pCR, suggesting that tumor-associated lymphocytes may be an important pathological factor predicting a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Lymphocytes; Neoadjuvant therapy; T-cell

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Humans
Lymphocyte Count
Lymphocytes
Multivariate Analysis
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2
Retrospective Studies
T-Lymphocytes
Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor, erbB-2

Figure

  • Figure 1 Histological patterns of lymphocyte infiltration into breast cancer tissue relative to the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. High-level lymphocyte infiltration was evident in a patient with pathologic complete response (pCR) (H&E, A: ×100, B: ×200). Lymphocyte infiltration was sparse in another patient who did not show pCR (H&E, C: ×100, D: ×200).

  • Figure 2 Immunohistochemical staining of CD3, CD8, and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) in breast cancer samples. Heavy infiltration of CD3+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ cells was observed in a patient who achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) (A-C, ×200). Only a few CD3+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ lymphocytes were observed, in a scattered manner, in the microscopic fields of a tissue sample from a patient who did not attain pCR (D-F, ×200).

  • Figure 3 Percentages of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patient groups divided by lymphocyte infiltration. The pCR rate increased as the peritumoral space became increasingly infiltrated by lymphocytes (A-C).


Reference

1. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003. 21:4165–4174.
Article
2. Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, Wieand S, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol. 1997. 15:2483–2493.
Article
3. Abrial SC, Penault-Llorca F, Delva R, Bougnoux P, Leduc B, Mouret-Reynier MA, et al. High prognostic significance of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005. 94:255–263.
Article
4. Tewari M, Krishnamurthy A, Shukla HS. Predictive markers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Surg Oncol. 2008. 17:301–311.
Article
5. Faneyte IF, Schrama JG, Peterse JL, Remijnse PL, Rodenhuis S, van de Vijver MJ. Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome. Br J Cancer. 2003. 88:406–412.
Article
6. DeNardo DG, Coussens LM. Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2007. 9:212.
Article
7. Schmidt M, Böhm D, von Törne C, Steiner E, Puhl A, Pilch H, et al. The humoral immune system has a key prognostic impact in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008. 68:5405–5413.
Article
8. Tomsová M, Melichar B, Sedláková I, Steiner I. Prognostic significance of CD3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2008. 108:415–420.
Article
9. Zhang L, Conejo-Garcia JR, Katsaros D, Gimotty PA, Massobrio M, Regnani G, et al. Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:203–213.
Article
10. Sato E, Olson SH, Ahn J, Bundy B, Nishikawa H, Qian F, et al. Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005. 102:18538–18543.
Article
11. Menard S, Tomasic G, Casalini P, Balsari A, Pilotti S, Cascinelli N, et al. Lymphoid infiltration as a prognostic variable for early-onset breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 1997. 3:817–819.
12. Ridolfi RL, Rosen PP, Port A, Kinne D, Miké V. Medullary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study with 10 year follow-up. Cancer. 1977. 40:1365–1385.
Article
13. Kuroda H, Tamaru J, Sakamoto G, Ohnisi K, Itoyama S. Immunophenotype of lymphocytic infiltration in medullary carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2005. 446:10–14.
Article
14. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Müller BM, Komor M, et al. Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010. 28:105–113.
Article
15. Hornychova H, Melichar B, Tomsova M, Mergancova J, Urminska H, Ryska A. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer Invest. 2008. 26:1024–1031.
Article
16. Zitvogel L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Kroemer G. Immunological aspects of cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008. 8:59–73.
Article
17. Ladoire S, Arnould L, Apetoh L, Coudert B, Martin F, Chauffert B, et al. Pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast carcinoma is associated with the disappearance of tumor-infiltrating foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008. 14:2413–2420.
Article
18. Bates GJ, Fox SB, Han C, Leek RD, Garcia JF, Harris AL, et al. Quantification of regulatory T cells enables the identification of high-risk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2006. 24:5373–5380.
Article
19. Jacobs TW, Gown AM, Yaziji H, Barnes MJ, Schnitt SJ. Specificity of HercepTest in determining HER-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring system. J Clin Oncol. 1999. 17:1983–1987.
20. Chollet P, Amat S, Cure H, de Latour M, Le Bouedec G, Mouret-Reynier MA, et al. Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002. 86:1041–1046.
Article
21. Menard C, Martin F, Apetoh L, Bouyer F, Ghiringhelli F. Cancer chemotherapy: not only a direct cytotoxic effect, but also an adjuvant for antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008. 57:1579–1587.
Article
22. Banchereau J, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998. 392:245–252.
Article
23. Zitvogel L, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, André F, Tesniere A, Kroemer G. The anticancer immune response: indispensable for therapeutic success? J Clin Invest. 2008. 118:1991–2001.
Article
24. Soliman H. Developing an effective breast cancer vaccine. Cancer Control. 2010. 17:183–190.
Article
25. Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009. 30:636–645.
Article
26. Ziegler SF. FOXP3: of mice and men. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006. 24:209–226.
Article
27. Oda N, Shimazu K, Naoi Y, Morimoto K, Shimomura A, Shimoda M, et al. Intratumoral regulatory T cells as an independent predictive factor for pathological complete response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel followed by 5-FU/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012. 136:107–116.
Article
28. Matsushita N, Pilon-Thomas SA, Martin LM, Riker AI. Comparative methodologies of regulatory T cell depletion in a murine melanoma model. J Immunol Methods. 2008. 333:167–179.
Article
29. Alexe G, Dalgin GS, Scanfeld D, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP, DeLisi C, et al. High expression of lymphocyte-associated genes in node-negative HER2+ breast cancers correlates with lower recurrence rates. Cancer Res. 2007. 67:10669–10676.
Article
30. Hanrahan EO, Hennessy BT, Valero V. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: an overview and review of recent clinical trials. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005. 6:1477–1491.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr