1. Dickstein R, Heffes Y, Shabtai EI, Markowitz E. Total knee arthroplasty in the elderly: patients' self-appraisal 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Gerontology. 1998; 44(4):204–210.
Article
2. Noble PC, Conditt MA, Cook KF, Mathis KB. The John Insall Award: patient expectations affect satisfaction with total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 452:35–43.
Article
3. Barrett WP. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference? Orthopedics. 2006; 29:9 Suppl. S53–S55.
4. Rostlund T, Carlsson L, Albrektsson B, Albrektsson T. Morphometrical studies of human femoral condyles. J Biomed Eng. 1989; 11(6):442–448.
Article
5. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2002; 15(4):213–217.
6. Hitt K, Shurman JR 2nd, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85:Suppl 4. 115–122.
7. Vaidya SV, Ranawat CS, Aroojis A, Laud NS. Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(1):79–85.
8. Urabe K, Miura H, Kuwano T, et al. Comparison between the shape of resected femoral sections and femoral prostheses used in total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients: simulation using three-dimensional computed tomography. J Knee Surg. 2003; 16(1):27–33.
9. Ho WP, Cheng CK, Liau JJ. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee. 2006; 13(1):12–14.
10. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Lai Y, et al. Three dimensional morphometry of the knee to design the total knee arthroplasty for Chinese population. Knee. 2009; 16(5):341–347.
11. Chaichankul C, Tanavalee A, Itiravivong P. Anthropometric measurements of knee joints in Thai population: correlation to the sizing of current knee prostheses. Knee. 2011; 18(1):5–10.
Article
12. Cheng FB, Ji XF, Zheng WX, et al. Use of anthropometric data from the medial tibial and femoral condyles to design unicondylar knee prostheses in the Chinese population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(3):352–358.
Article
13. Lim HC, Bae JH, Yoon JY, Kim SJ, Kim JG, Lee JM. Gender differences of the morphology of the distal femur and proximal tibia in a Korean population. Knee. 2013; 20(1):26–30.
Article
14. Chin PL, Tey TT, Ibrahim MY, Chia SL, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Intraoperative morphometric study of gender differences in Asian femurs. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(7):984–988.
Article
15. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (205):5–11.
Article
16. Matsuda S, Matsuda H, Miyagi T, Sasaki K, Iwamoto Y, Miura H. Femoral condyle geometry in the normal and varus knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (349):183–188.
Article
17. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, et al. Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res. 2004; 22(1):104–109.
Article
18. Guy SP, Farndon MA, Sidhom S, Al-Lami M, Bennett C, London NJ. Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: a prospective clinical study. Knee. 2012; 19(1):28–31.
Article
19. Mahoney OM, Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(5):1115–1121.
Article
20. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(10):1911–1920.
Article
21. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of standard and gender-specific posterior-cruciate-retaining high-flexion total knee replacements: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(5):639–645.
22. Greene KA. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22:7 Suppl 3. 27–31.
Article
23. Bellemans J, Carpentier K, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J, Victor J. The John Insall Award: both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee in patients undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(1):29–36.
Article
24. Harwin SF, Greene KA, Hitt K. Early experience with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of motion and function with gender-specific sizing. Surg Technol Int. 2007; 16:199–205.
25. Choi YJ, Kang JH, Lee KW, Joo YS, Park JS, Choo HH. Early aseptic loosening after total knee replacement using legacy posterior stabilized-flex prosthesis. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2012; 47(1):35–40.
Article
26. King TV, Scott RD. Femoral component loosening in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; (194):285–290.
Article
27. Zelle J, Janssen D, Van Eijden J, De Waal Malefijt M, Verdonschot N. Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component? J Orthop Res. 2011; 29(7):976–983.
Article
28. Barnes CL, Scott RD. Popliteus tendon dysfunction following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(4):543–545.
Article
29. Ryu J, Saito S, Yamamoto K, Sano S. Factors influencing the postoperative range of motion in total knee arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1993; 53(3):35–40.
30. Mihalko W, Fishkin Z, Krackow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 449:283–287.
Article