J Gastric Cancer.  2012 Dec;12(4):237-242.

Laparoscopic Primary Repair with Omentopexy for Duodenal Ulcer Perforation: A Single Institution Experience of 21 Cases

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea. md9650@hanyang.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
Despite the great advances in laparoscopic techniques, most active general surgeons do not apply laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation when facing a real-life emergency. Therefore, our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery in duodenal ulcer perforation, and provide a step-by-step protocol with tips and recommendations for less experienced surgeons.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between March, 2011 and May, 2012, 21 patients presenting with duodenal ulcer perforation underwent laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy. There were no contraindications to perform laparoscopic surgery, and the choice of primary repair was decided according to the size of the perforation. The procedure for laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy consisted of peritoneal lavage, primary suture, and omentopexy using a knot pusher.
RESULTS
During the operation, no conversion to open surgery or intra-operative events occurred. The median operation time was 45.0 minutes (20~80 minutes). Median day of commencement of a soft diet was day 6 (4~17 days). After surgery, the median hospital stay was 8.0 days (5~27 days). Postoperative complications occurred in one patient, which included a minor leakage. This complication was resolved by conservative management.
CONCLUSIONS
Although our study was carried out on a small number of patients at a single institution, we conclude that laparoscopic primary repair can be an effective surgical method in the treatment of duodenal ulcer perforation. We believe that the detailed explanation of our procedure will help beginners to perform laparoscopic primary repair more easily.

Keyword

Duodenal ulcer; Perforation; Laproscopy; Primary repair

MeSH Terms

Conversion to Open Surgery
Diet
Duodenal Ulcer
Emergencies
Humans
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Peritoneal Lavage
Postoperative Complications
Sutures

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Trocar placements for laparoscopic primary repair with omentopexy. (B) Grasping below 2 cm of needle. (C) Needle can move freely in and out of the troca. (D) Stitch of round needle in normal tissue. Op = operator; F.A = first assistant; Sc = scopist; S.N = scrub nurse.

  • Fig. 2 (A) Extract the needle out of the perforation site. (B) Extract the thread by apply the principle of pulley. (C) Knot pushing was done through right upper troca. (D) Omentum was placed above suture site.


Reference

1. Abdel-Salam WN, Katri KM, Bessa SS, El-Kayal el-SA. Laparoscopic-assisted truncal vagotomy and gastro-jejunostomy: trial of simplification. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009. 19:125–127.
Article
2. Jani K, Saxena AK, Vaghasia R. Omental plugging for large-sized duodenal peptic perforations: a prospective randomized study of 100 patients. South Med J. 2006. 99:467–471.
Article
3. Lal P, Vindal A, Hadke NS. Controlled tube duodenostomy in the management of giant duodenal ulcer perforation: a new technique for a surgically challenging condition. Am J Surg. 2009. 198:319–323.
Article
4. Lam PW, Lam MC, Hui EK, Sun YW, Mok FP. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the "three-stitch" Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc. 2005. 19:1627–1630.
Article
5. Lee J, Sung K, Lee D, Lee W, Kim W. Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal "cross and twine" knotting. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:229–233.
6. Song KY, Kim TH, Kim SN, Park CH. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the simple "one-stitch" suture with omental patch technique. Surg Endosc. 2008. 22:1632–1635.
7. Kim MG, Park HK, Park JJ, Lee HG, Nam YS. The applicability of laparoscopic gastrectomy in the surgical treatment of giant duodenal ulcer perforation. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012. 22:122–126.
Article
8. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Endosc. 2005. 19:1565–1571.
Article
9. Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A. Laparoscopic repair/peritoneal toilet of perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1990. 4:232–233.
Article
10. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2002. 235:313–319.
Article
11. Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Rovertson C, Dawson JJ, et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg. 1996. 224:131–138.
Article
12. Seelig MH, Seelig SK, Behr C, Schönleben K. Comparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003. 37:226–229.
Article
13. Mehendale VG, Shenoy SN, Joshi AM, Chaudhari NC. Laparoscopic versus open surgical closure of perforated duodenal ulcers: a comparative study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2002. 21:222–224.
Article
14. Sø JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P. Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1996. 10:1060–1063.
Article
15. Siu WT, Chau CH, Law BK, Tang CN, Ha PY, Li MK. Routine use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 2004. 91:481–484.
Article
16. Robertson GS, Wemyss-Holden SA, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. The role of laparoscopy in generalised peritonitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000. 82:6–10.
Article
17. Bergamaschi R, Mårvik R, Johnsen G, Thoresen JE, Ystgaard B, Myrvold HE. Open vs laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc. 1999. 13:679–682.
Article
18. Michelet I, Agresta F. Perforated peptic ulcer: laparoscopic approach. Eur J Surg. 2000. 166:405–408.
Article
19. Matsuda M, Nishiyama M, Hanai T, Saeki S, Watanabe T. Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1995. 221:236–240.
Article
20. Naesgaard JM, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Trondsen E, Faerden AE, Rosseland AR. Laparoscopic and open operation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Surg. 1999. 165:209–214.
Article
21. Jin SH, Kim DY, Kim H, Jeong IH, Kim MW, Cho YK, et al. Multidimensional learning curve in laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2007. 21:28–33.
Article
22. Kim MC, Jung GJ, Kim HH. Learning curve of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2005. 11:7508–7511.
Article
23. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Yamamoto N, Sato T, Oshima T, Nagano Y, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008. 18:236–241.
Article
24. Zhang X, Tanigawa N. Learning curve of laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer, a laparoscopic distal gastrectomy-based analysis. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:1259–1264.
Article
25. Kim MG, Kim KC, Yook JH, Kim BS, Kim TH, Kim BS. A practical way to overcome the learning period of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011. 25:3838–3844.
Article
26. Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. The accordion severity grading system of surgical complications. Ann Surg. 2009. 250:177–186.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JGC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr