J Gastric Cancer.  2012 Jun;12(2):113-119.

The Predictors and Clinical Impact of Positive Resection Margins on Frozen Section in Gastric Cancer Surgery

• Kim SY
• Hwang YS
• Sohn TS
• Oh SJ
• Choi MG
• Noh JH
• Bae JM
• Kim S

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics of tumor and prognosis, depending on the status of resection margin involvement, on the frozen section diagnosis in gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study was conducted retrospectively, in 83 margin-positive patients on the frozen section diagnosis, who underwent gastrectomy from July 1995 to September 2006. The control group was selected by matching the age, gender, TNM stage and status of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, among those who had shown clear resection margins. The characteristics of tumor and patient survival are investigated, and they were analyzed between the two groups.
RESULTS
The tumor size was significantly larger in the study group than that of the control group (P=0.037). There was significant difference between the two groups in location of the tumors (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis indicated that only the location and Lauren's classification are independent factors, which affected the resection margin involvement. Median survival was 41.0+/-11.5 months in the study group and 93.0+/-30.3 months in the control group (P=0.049). In the survival analysis, it was investigated that TNM stage and the resection margin involvement of the frozen section diagnosis were the critical variables.
CONCLUSIONS
When the tumor is located at the middle or the upper third, or the Lauren's indeterminate type, they are highly likely to show the resection margin involvement on the frozen section diagnosis, and it can, therefore, have negative effects on the prognosis. It is considered as good to perform more extensive resection as possible, during the initial resection.

Keyword

Stomach neoplasms; Gastrectomy; Resection margin; Frozen sections

MeSH Terms

Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant
Frozen Sections
Gastrectomy
Humans
Multivariate Analysis
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Stomach Neoplasms

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Cumulative survival curves according to the resection margin status on frozen section. RM = resection margin.

Reference

1. Songun I, Bonenkamp JJ, Hermans J, van Krieken JH, van de Velde CJ. Prognostic value of resection-line involvement in patients undergoing curative resections for gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1996. 32A:433–437.

2. Hallissey MT, Jewkes AJ, Dunn JA, Ward L, Fielding JW. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer: a continuing problem. Br J Surg. 1993. 80:1418–1420.

3. Morgagni P, Garcea D, Marrelli D, De Manzoni G, Natalini G, Kurihara H, et al. Resection line involvement after gastric cancer surgery: clinical outcome in nonsurgically retreated patients. World J Surg. 2008. 32:2661–2667.

4. Cho BC, Jeung HC, Choi HJ, Rha SY, Hyung WJ, Cheong JH, et al. Prognostic impact of resection margin involvement after extended (D2/D3) gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a 15-year experience at a single institute. J Surg Oncol. 2007. 95:461–468.

5. Fujimoto S, Takahashi M, Mutou T, Kobayashi K, Toyosawa T, Ohkubo H. Clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients with cancer infiltration at surgical margin at gastrectomy. Anticancer Res. 1997. 17:689–694.

6. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. 17:3077–3079.

7. Clark CJ, Thirlby RC, Picozzi V Jr, Schembre DB, Cummings FP, Lin E. Current problems in surgery: gastric cancer. Curr Probl Surg. 2006. 43:566–670.

8. Dicken BJ, Bigam DL, Cass C, Mackey JR, Joy AA, Hamilton SM. Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann Surg. 2005. 241:27–39.

9. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011. 14:113–123.

10. Jang YJ, Park MS, Kim JH, Park SS, Park SH, Kim SJ, et al. Advanced gastric cancer in the middle one-third of the stomach: should surgeons perform total gastrectomy? J Surg Oncol. 2010. 101:451–456.

11. Lee JH, Kim YI. Which is the optimal extent of resection in middle third gastric cancer between total gastrectomy and subtotal gastrectomy? J Gastric Cancer. 2010. 10:226–233.

12. Cunningham SC, Kamangar F, Kim MP, Hammoud S, Haque R, Maitra A, et al. Survival after gastric adenocarcinoma resection: eighteen-year experience at a single institution. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005. 9:718–725.

13. Wang SY, Yeh CN, Lee HL, Liu YY, Chao TC, Hwang TL, et al. Clinical impact of positive surgical margin status on gastric cancer patients undergoing gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009. 16:2738–2743.

14. Cascinu S, Giordani P, Catalano V, Agostinelli R, Catalano G. Resection-line involvement in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative resections: implications for clinical management. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999. 29:291–293.

15. Kim SH, Karpeh MS, Klimstra DS, Leung D, Brennan MF. Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999. 3:24–33.