Korean J Physiol Pharmacol.  2017 Mar;21(2):215-223. 10.4196/kjpp.2017.21.2.215.

Effects of acidic pH on voltage-gated ion channels in rat trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus neurons

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pharmacology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea. jis7619@knu.ac.kr
  • 2Brain Science & Engineering Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea.

Abstract

The effects of acidic pH on several voltage-dependent ion channels, such as voltage-dependent K⁺ and Ca²âº channels, and hyperpolarization-gated and cyclic nucleotide-activated cation (HCN) channels, were examined using a whole-cell patch clamp technique on mechanically isolated rat mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus neurons. The application of a pH 6.5 solution had no effect on the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent K⁺ currents. A pH 6.0 solution slightly, but significantly inhibited the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent K⁺ currents. The pH 6.0 also shifted both the current-voltage and conductance-voltage relationships to the depolarization range. The application of a pH 6.5 solution scarcely affected the peak amplitude of membrane currents mediated by HCN channels, which were profoundly inhibited by the general HCN channel blocker Cs⁺ (1 mM). However, the pH 6.0 solution slightly, but significantly inhibited the peak amplitude of HCN-mediated currents. Although the pH 6.0 solution showed complex modulation of the current-voltage and conductance-voltage relationships, the midpoint voltages for the activation of HCN channels were not changed by acidic pH. On the other hand, voltage-dependent Ca²âº channels were significantly inhibited by an acidic pH. The application of an acidic pH solution significantly shifted the current-voltage and conductance-voltage relationships to the depolarization range. The modulation of several voltage-dependent ion channels by an acidic pH might affect the excitability of mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus neurons, and thus physiological functions mediated by the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus could be affected in acidic pH conditions.

Keyword

Acidosis; Patch clamp; Proprioception; Trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus; Voltage-gated ion channels

MeSH Terms

Acidosis
Animals
Hand
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration*
Ion Channels*
Membranes
Neurons*
Proprioception
Rats*
Tegmentum Mesencephali
Ion Channels

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Effects of acidic pH on voltage-dependent K+ currents.(A) Phase contrast images of Vmes (upper) and non-Vmes (lower) neurons isolated from the Vmes region. While Vmes neurons, which are primary sensory neurons, generally had a round or oval soma without any dendritic processes, non-Vmes neurons, which are central neurons, have several dendritic processes. Scale bars: 20 µm. (B) pH 6.0-induced current recorded from Vmes neurons. Note that the acid-induced currents returned to the basal current levels within 10 s of the application of the pH 6.0 solution. Inset: typical current responses to hyperpolarizing voltage step pulses (–10 mV, 150 ms duration) before (black) and 30 s after the application of the pH 6.0 solution (gray). (C) A typical time course of the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent K+ currents before, during, and after the application of a solution with an acidic pH. Insets represent raw traces of voltage-dependent K+ currents at numbered regions. (D) Acidic pH-induced changes in the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent K+ currents. Each column represents the mean and standard error of mean from 8 and 9 experiments for the pH 6.5 and pH 6.0 conditions, respectively. *p<0.05; n.s: not significant.

  • Fig. 2 Effects of acidic pH on the voltage-dependence of voltage-dependent K+ currents.(A) Typical traces of voltage-dependent K+ currents before (left) and during (right) the application of a solution with an acidic pH (a: pH 6.5; b: pH 6.0). (B) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of voltage-dependent K+ channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.5 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and standard error of mean (SEM) from 8 experiments. (C) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of voltage-dependent K+ channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.0 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 10 experiments. (D) Acidic pH-induced changes in V50,act (a) and k (b) of voltage-dependent K+ channels. Each column and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 8 and 10 experiments for the pH 6.5 and pH 6.0 conditions, respectively. **p<0.01; n.s: not significant.

  • Fig. 3 Effects of acidic pH on cyclic nucleotide-activated cation (HCN) currents.(A) A typical time course of the peak amplitude of HCN currents before, during, and after the application of a solution with an acidic pH and 1 mM Cs+. Note that Cs+, a general HCN channel blocker, greatly inhibited the membrane currents induced by hyperpolarizing voltage stimuli. Insets represent raw traces of HCN currents at numbered regions. (B) Acidic pH-induced changes in the peak amplitudes of HCN currents. Each column represents the mean and standard error of mean from 9, 9, and 6 experiments for the pH 6.5, pH 6.0, and Cs+ conditions, respectively. *p<0.05, **p<0.01; n.s: not significant.

  • Fig. 4 Effects of acidic pH on the voltage-dependence of cyclic nucleotide-activated cation (HCN) currents.(A) Typical traces of HCN currents before (left) and during (right) the application of a solution with an acidic pH (a: pH 6.5; b: pH 6.0). (B) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of HCN channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.5 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and standard error of mean (SEM) from 9 experiments. (C) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of HCN channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.0 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 10 experiments. (D) Acidic pH-induced changes in V50,act (a) and k (b) of HCN channels. Each column and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 9 and 10 experiments for the pH 6.5 and pH 6.0 conditions, respectively. *p<0.05; n.s: not significant.

  • Fig. 5 Effects of acidic pH on voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents.(A) A typical time course of the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents before, during, and after the application of a solution with an acidic pH and 100 µM Cd2+. Note that Cd2+, a general voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker, greatly inhibited the membrane currents induced by depolarizing voltage stimuli. Insets represent raw traces of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents at numbered regions. (B) Acidic pH-induced changes in the peak amplitude of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents. Each column represents the mean and standard error of mean from 8, 9, and 9 experiments for the pH 6.5, pH 6.0, and Cd2+ conditions, respectively. **p<0.01.

  • Fig. 6 Effects of acidic pH on the voltage-dependence of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents.(A) Typical traces of voltage-dependent Ca2+ currents before (left) and during (right) the application of a solution with an acidic pH (a: pH 6.5; b: pH 6.0). (B) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.5 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and standard error of mean (SEM) from 8 experiments. (C) Current-voltage (a) and conductance-voltage (b) relationships of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in the control (open circles) and pH 6.0 conditions (closed circles). Each circle and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 10 experiments. (D) Acidic pH-induced changes in V50,act (a) and k (b) of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels. Each column and error bar represents the mean and SEM from 8 and 10 experiments for the pH 6.5 and pH 6.0 conditions, respectively. *p<0.05, **p<0.01.


Reference

1. Reeh PW, Steen KH. Tissue acidosis in nociception and pain. Prog Brain Res. 1996; 113:143–151. PMID: 9009732.
2. Chesler M, Kaila K. Modulation of pH by neuronal activity. Trends Neurosci. 1992; 15:396–402. PMID: 1279865.
Article
3. de Hemptinne A, Marrannes R, Vanheel B. Surface pH and the control of intracellular pH in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1987; 65:970–977. PMID: 3304590.
4. Steen KH, Reeh PW. Sustained graded pain and hyperalgesia from harmless experimental tissue acidosis in human skin. Neurosci Lett. 1993; 154:113–116. PMID: 8361622.
Article
5. Steen KH, Reeh PW, Anton F, Handwerker HO. Protons selectively induce lasting excitation and sensitization to mechanical stimulation of nociceptors in rat skin, in vitro. J Neurosci. 1992; 12:86–95. PMID: 1309578.
Article
6. Steen KH, Issberner U, Reeh PW. Pain due to experimental acidosis in human skin: evidence for non-adapting nociceptor excitation. Neurosci Lett. 1995; 199:29–32. PMID: 8584219.
Article
7. Krishtal O. The ASICs: signaling molecules? Modulators? Trends Neurosci. 2003; 26:477–483. PMID: 12948658.
Article
8. Wemmie JA, Price MP, Welsh MJ. Acid-sensing ion channels: advances, questions and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Neurosci. 2006; 29:578–586. PMID: 16891000.
Article
9. Wemmie JA, Taugher RJ, Kreple CJ. Acid-sensing ion channels in pain and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013; 14:461–471. PMID: 23783197.
Article
10. Holzer P. Acid-sensitive ion channels and receptors. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009; (194):283–332. PMID: 19655111.
Article
11. Cody FW, Lee RW, Taylor A. A functional analysis of the components of the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth nerve in the cat. J Physiol. 1972; 226:249–261. PMID: 4263681.
Article
12. Jacquin MF, Rhoades RW, Enfiejian HL, Egger MD. Organization and morphology of masticatory neurons in the rat: a retrograde HRP study. J Comp Neurol. 1983; 218:239–256. PMID: 6604076.
Article
13. Lazarov NE. Comparative analysis of the chemical neuroanatomy of the mammalian trigeminal ganglion and mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. Prog Neurobiol. 2002; 66:19–59. PMID: 11897404.
Article
14. Verdier D, Lund JP, Kolta A. Synaptic inputs to trigeminal primary afferent neurons cause firing and modulate intrinsic oscillatory activity. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92:2444–2455. PMID: 15381749.
Article
15. Yokomizo Y, Murai Y, Tanaka E, Inokuchi H, Kusukawa J, Higashi H. Excitatory GABAergic synaptic potentials in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus of adult rat in vitro. Neurosci Res. 2005; 51:463–474. PMID: 15740809.
Article
16. Sutherland SP, Benson CJ, Adelman JP, McCleskey EW. Acid-sensing ion channel 3 matches the acid-gated current in cardiac ischemia-sensing neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98:711–716. PMID: 11120882.
Article
17. Lu Y, Ma X, Sabharwal R, Snitsarev V, Morgan D, Rahmouni K, Drummond HA, Whiteis CA, Costa V, Price M, Benson C, Welsh MJ, Chapleau MW, Abboud FM. The ion channel ASIC2 is required for baroreceptor and autonomic control of the circulation. Neuron. 2009; 64:885–897. PMID: 20064394.
Article
18. Molliver DC, Immke DC, Fierro L, Paré M, Rice FL, McCleskey EW. ASIC3, an acid-sensing ion channel, is expressed in metaboreceptive sensory neurons. Mol Pain. 2005; 1:35. PMID: 16305749.
Article
19. Connor M, Naves LA, McCleskey EW. Contrasting phenotypes of putative proprioceptive and nociceptive trigeminal neurons innervating jaw muscle in rat. Mol Pain. 2005; 1:31. PMID: 16242047.
Article
20. Kang IS, Cho JH, Choi IS, Kim DY, Jang IS. Acidic pH modulation of Na+ channels in trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus neurons. Neuroreport. 2016; 27:1274–1280. PMID: 27755281.
21. Rhee JS, Ishibashi H, Akaike N. Calcium channels in the GABAergic presynaptic nerve terminals projecting to meynert neurons of the rat. J Neurochem. 1999; 72:800–807. PMID: 9930756.
Article
22. Womble MD, Moises HC. Hyperpolarization-activated currents in neurons of the rat basolateral amygdala. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 70:2056–2065. PMID: 7507523.
Article
23. Murase K, Ryu PD, Randic M. Excitatory and inhibitory amino acids and peptide-induced responses in acutely isolated rat spinal dorsal horn neurons. Neurosci Lett. 1989; 103:56–63. PMID: 2476693.
Article
24. Nakamura M, Jang IS. Characterization of proton-induced currents in rat trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus neurons. Brain Res. 2014; 1583:12–22. PMID: 25128599.
Article
25. Gutman GA, Chandy KG, Grissmer S, Lazdunski M, McKinnon D, Pardo LA, Robertson GA, Rudy B, Sanguinetti MC, Stühmer W, Wang X. International Union of Pharmacology. LIII. Nomenclature and molecular relationships of voltage-gated potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005; 57:473–508. PMID: 16382104.
Article
26. Alexander SP, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol. 2011; 164(Suppl 1):S1–S324. PMID: 22040146.
Article
27. Aguilar-Bryan L, Clement JP 4th, Gonzalez G, Kunjilwar K, Babenko A, Bryan J. Toward understanding the assembly and structure of KATP channels. Physiol Rev. 1998; 78:227–245. PMID: 9457174.
Article
28. Kobayashi T, Ikeda K. G protein-activated inwardly rectifying potassium channels as potential therapeutic targets. Curr Pharm Des. 2006; 12:4513–4523. PMID: 17168757.
Article
29. Kim D. Physiology and pharmacology of two-pore domain potassium channels. Curr Pharm Des. 2005; 11:2717–2736. PMID: 16101451.
Article
30. Goldstein SA, Bayliss DA, Kim D, Lesage F, Plant LD, Rajan S. International Union of Pharmacology. LV. Nomenclature and molecular relationships of two-P potassium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005; 57:527–540. PMID: 16382106.
Article
31. Matsumoto S, Yoshida S, Takahashi M, Saiki C, Takeda M. The roles of I(D), I(A) and I(K) in the electrophysiological functions of small diameter rat trigeminal ganglion neurons. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2010; 3:30–36. PMID: 20030627.
32. Tombaugh GC, Somjen GG. Effects of extracellular pH on voltage-gated Na+, K+ and Ca2+ currents in isolated rat CA1 neurons. J Physiol. 1996; 493:719–732. PMID: 8799894.
33. Postea O, Biel M. Exploring HCN channels as novel drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011; 10:903–914. PMID: 22094868.
Article
34. He C, Chen F, Li B, Hu Z. Neurophysiology of HCN channels: from cellular functions to multiple regulations. Prog Neurobiol. 2014; 112:1–23. PMID: 24184323.
Article
35. Cohen IS, Robinson RB. Pacemaker current and automatic rhythms: toward a molecular understanding. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006; (171):41–71.
Article
36. Siu CW, Lieu DK, Li RA. HCN-encoded pacemaker channels: from physiology and biophysics to bioengineering. J Membr Biol. 2006; 214:115–122. PMID: 17558529.
Article
37. Wahl-Schott C, Fenske S, Biel M. HCN channels: new roles in sinoatrial node function. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014; 15:83–90. PMID: 24441197.
Article
38. Dunlop J, Vasilyev D, Lu P, Cummons T, Bowlby MR. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels and pain. Curr Pharm Des. 2009; 15:1767–1772. PMID: 19442189.
Article
39. Noam Y, Bernard C, Baram TZ. Towards an integrated view of HCN channel role in epilepsy. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011; 21:873–879. PMID: 21782415.
Article
40. Emery EC, Young GT, McNaughton PA. HCN2 ion channels: an emerging role as the pacemakers of pain. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 33:456–463. PMID: 22613784.
Article
41. DiFrancesco JC, DiFrancesco D. Dysfunctional HCN ion channels in neurological diseases. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015; 6:174. PMID: 25805968.
Article
42. Khakh BS, Henderson G. Hyperpolarization-activated cationic currents (Ih) in neurones of the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus of the rat. J Physiol. 1998; 510:695–704. PMID: 9660886.
Article
43. Zamponi GW, Striessnig J, Koschak A, Dolphin AC. The physiology, pathology, and pharmacology of voltage-gated calcium channels and their future therapeutic potential. Pharmacol Rev. 2015; 67:821–870. PMID: 26362469.
Article
44. Wu LG, Saggau P. Presynaptic inhibition of elicited neurotransmitter release. Trends Neurosci. 1997; 20:204–212. PMID: 9141196.
Article
45. Lacinová L. Pharmacology of recombinant low-voltage activated calcium channels. Curr Drug Targets CNS Neurol Disord. 2004; 3:105–111. PMID: 15078185.
46. Ohmori H, Yoshii M. Surface potential reflected in both gating and permeation mechanisms of sodium and calcium channels of the tunicate egg cell membrane. J Physiol. 1977; 267:429–463. PMID: 17734.
Article
47. Irisawa H, Sato R. Intra- and extracellular actions of proton on the calcium current of isolated guinea pig ventricular cells. Circ Res. 1986; 59:348–355. PMID: 2429781.
Article
48. Tytgat J, Nilius B, Carmeliet E. Modulation of the T-type cardiac Ca channel by changes in proton concentration. J Gen Physiol. 1990; 96:973–990. PMID: 2177772.
Article
49. Hille B. Charges and potentials at the nerve surface. Divalent ions and pH. J Gen Physiol. 1968; 51:221–236.
50. Khan A, Romantseva L, Lam A, Lipkind G, Fozzard HA. Role of outer ring carboxylates of the rat skeletal muscle sodium channel pore in proton block. J Physiol. 2002; 543:71–84. PMID: 12181282.
Article
51. Bénitah J, Balser JR, Marban E, Tomaselli GF. Proton inhibition of sodium channels: mechanism of gating shifts and reduced conductance. J Membr Biol. 1997; 155:121–131. PMID: 9049106.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJPP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr