Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg.  2016 Nov;38(11):41. 10.1186/s40902-016-0087-8.

Minimal invasive horizontal ridge augmentation using subperiosteal tunneling technique

• Kim HS
• Kim YK
• Yun PY

• KMID: 2362402
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0087-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the prognosis of minimal invasive horizontal ridge augmentation (MIHRA) technique using small incision and subperiosteal tunneling technique.
METHODS
This study targeted 25 partially edentulous patients (10 males and 15 females, mean age 48.8 ± 19.7 years) who needed bone graft for installation of the implants due to alveolar bone deficiency. The patients took the radiographic exam, panoramic and periapical view at first visit, and had implant fixture installation surgery. All patients received immediate or delayed implant surgery with bone graft using U-shaped incision and tunneling technique. After an average of 2.8 months, the prosthesis was connected and functioned. The clinical prognosis was recorded by observation of the peri-implant tissue at every visit. A year after restoration, the crestal bone loss around the implant was measured by taking the follow-up radiographs. One patient took 3D-CT before bone graft, after bone graft, and 2 years after restoration to compare and analyze change of alveolar bone width.
RESULTS
This study included 25 patients and 39 implants. Thirty eight implants (97.4 %) survived. As for postoperative complications, five patients showed minor infection symptoms, like swelling and tenderness after bone graft. The other one had buccal fenestration, and secondary bone graft was done by the same technique. No complications related with bone graft were found except in these patients. The mean crestal bone loss around the implants was 0.03 mm 1 year after restoration, and this was an adequate clinical prognosis. A patient took 3D-CT after bone graft, and the width of alveolar bone increased 4.32 mm added to 4.6 mm of former alveolar bone width. Two years after bone graft, the width of alveolar bone was 8.13 mm, and this suggested that the resorption rate of bone graft material was 18.29 % during 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS
The bone graft material retained within a pouch formed using U-shaped incision and tunneling technique resulted with a few complications, and the prognosis of the implants placed above the alveolar bone was adequate.

Keyword

Alveolar bone grafting; Alveolar ridge augmentation; Dental implants; Minimally invasive surgical procedures

MeSH Terms

Alveolar Bone Grafting
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Dental Implants
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Postoperative Complications
Prognosis
Prostheses and Implants
Retrospective Studies
Transplants
Dental Implants