J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc.  2016 Nov;55(4):357-364. 10.4306/jknpa.2016.55.4.357.

Admission Status Conversion from Voluntary into Involuntary, Is It Illegal

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. amc.cykim@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Psychiatry, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The current Korean Mental Health Act (KMHA) indicates that a patient, who voluntarily gave their permission for admission into a mental health facility, has the right to be discharged upon personal request. However, there is no clause in the KMHA that allows a change in a patient's voluntary status under special circumstances. The purpose of this study was to investigate problems that may arise from the lack of such a clause ; problems that can result in misinterpretation and lead to the prohibition of voluntary admission status conversion.
METHODS
Previous cases presented to the National Human Rights Commission of Korea were investigated in order to determine the current state in Korean psychiatric practice regarding the conversion from voluntary to involuntary admission status. In addition, examples of similar mental health legislation in use by the United Nations (UN), World Health Organization (WHO), and several advanced countries pertaining to such conversions were investigated. These examples were used as models for making recommendations for possible changes to the KMHA.
RESULTS
From 2010 to 2014, more than 220 petitions were filed with the National Human Right Commission of Korea. The petitions involved voluntarily institutionalized patients who had their requests for discharge rejected. Based on mental health regulations of the UN, WHO, and such countries as the United States, England, Canada, Australia, and Japan, the KMHA should include a provision that, upon receiving a discharge request, allows for discharge refusal if the voluntarily admitted patient is considered not mentally fit.
CONCLUSION
The results suggest that the absence of a regulation allowing admission status conversion in the current KMHA is inappropriate. Rectification of this absence is urgently needed.

Keyword

Voluntary admission; Involuntary admission; Admission status conversion; Admission status change; Mental health law

MeSH Terms

Australia
Canada
England
Human Rights
Humans
Japan
Korea
Mental Health
Patient Admission
Social Control, Formal
United Nations
United States
World Health Organization

Cited by  1 articles

Critique of Mental Health Welfare Law in Korea : Focusing on Involuntary Hospitalization Criteria
Je Sik Yoon, Chang Yoon Kim, Joon-Ho Ahn
J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2018;57(2):145-156.    doi: 10.4306/jknpa.2018.57.2.145.


Reference

1. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Order 11Jinjeong 0267400. 2011. 07. 22. [Infringement of human rights by refusal discharge].
2. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Order 13Jinjeong 0812100. 2014. 02. 17. [Unjustified admission status conversion of voluntary admission].
3. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Order 13Jinjeong 07229700. 2014. 01. 05. [Admission status conversion of voluntary admission].
4. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Order 13Jinjeong 851700. 2015. 07. 10. [Admission status conversion from voluntary to Involuntary against the voluntary patient's will].
5. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. Order 15Jinjeong 0485000. 2015. 08. 20. [Unjustified change of admission status].
6. National Human Rights Commission of Korea. National Human Right Commission of The Republic of Korea. cited 2016 May 9. Available from: http://www.humanrights.go.kr/00_main/main.jsp.
7. Equalrightstrust.org [homepage on the Internet]. UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care. cited 2016 May 9. Available from: http://www.equalrightstrust.org/content/un-principles-protection-persons-mental-illness-and-improvement-mental-health-care.
8. Shin KC. The involuntary admission and discharge of the patients with mental illness: focusing on the requisites for discharge of the habeas corpus act. Justice. 2009; (113):211–245.
9. World Health Organization. Mental health, human rights and legislation. Geneva: World Health Organization;2005.
10. Mental Health Act 1983. Chapter 20, Part II, section 5. Application in respect of patient already in hospital. cited 2016 May 9. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/pdfs/ukpga_19830020_en.pdf.
12. Likms.assembly.go.kr [homepage on the Internet]. Seoul: The National Assembly of the Republic of Korea;cited 2016 May 9. Available from: http://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/billDetail.do?billId=016000&ageFrom=20&ageTo=20.
13. Sadock BJ, Riotz P, Sadock VA. Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/clinical Psychiatry. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2015.
14. Shin KC. Problem analysis and improvement strategy for involuntary admission in mental health act: focusing on the restoration of personal subject turned into reification. Seoul Law Rev. 2014; 22:637–679.
15. Hong JP, Hwang SC, Park S, Suh T, Chung EK, Kim JH, et al. Comparison of major procedures of Korean Mental Health law with other developed countries. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2009; 48:92–101.
Full Text Links
  • JKNA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr