Healthc Inform Res.  2016 Jul;22(3):231-237. 10.4258/hir.2016.22.3.231.

Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Information Technology and Management, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. R.Rabiei@sbmu.ac.ir
  • 2Department of Health Information Management, Nursing and Allied Health Faculty, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
In hospitals, the pharmacy information system (PIS) is usually a sub-system of the hospital information system (HIS). The PIS supports the distribution and management of drugs, shows drug and medical device inventory, and facilitates preparing needed reports. In this study, pharmacy information systems implemented in general teaching hospitals affiliated to medical universities in Tehran (Iran) were evaluated using a multi-dimensional tool.
METHODS
This was an evaluation study conducted in 2015. To collect data, a checklist was developed by reviewing the relevant literature; this checklist included both general and specific criteria to evaluate pharmacy information systems. The checklist was then validated by medical informatics experts and pharmacists. The sample of the study included five PIS in general-teaching hospitals affiliated to three medical universities in Tehran (Iran). Data were collected using the checklist and through observing the systems. The findings were presented as tables.
RESULTS
Five PIS were evaluated in the five general-teaching hospitals that had the highest bed numbers. The findings showed that the evaluated pharmacy information systems lacked some important general and specific criteria. Among the general evaluation criteria, it was found that only two of the PIS studied were capable of restricting repeated attempts made for unauthorized access to the systems. With respect to the specific evaluation criteria, no attention was paid to the patient safety aspect.
CONCLUSIONS
The PIS studied were mainly designed to support financial tasks; little attention was paid to clinical and patient safety features.

Keyword

Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems; Evaluation Studies; Medical Informatics; Hospital Information System; Drug Information Services

MeSH Terms

Checklist
Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems
Drug Information Services
Hospital Information Systems
Hospitals, Teaching*
Humans
Information Systems*
Medical Informatics
Patient Safety
Pharmacists
Pharmacy*

Reference

1. Colla CH, Lewis VA, Beaulieu-Jones BR, Morden NE. Role of pharmacy services in accountable care organizations. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015; 21(4):338–344.
Article
2. Westerling AM, Haikala V, Airaksinen M. The role of information technology in the development of community pharmacy services: visions and strategic views of international experts. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011; 7(4):430–437.
Article
3. Bepko RJ Jr, Moore JR, Coleman JR. Implementation of a pharmacy automation system (robotics) to ensure medication safety at Norwalk hospital. Qual Manag Health Care. 2009; 18(2):103–114.
Article
4. Pedersen CA, Schneider PJ, Scheckelhoff DJ. ASHP national survey of pharmacy practice in hospital settings: dispensing and administration: 2014. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015; 72(13):1119–1137.
Article
5. Mitchell SH, Veltri MA, Kim GR. Dispensing: pharmacy information systems. In : Lehmann CU, Kim GR, Johnson KB, editors. Pediatric informatics. New York (NY): Springer;2009. p. 345–355.
6. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ. Biomedical informatics: computer applications in health care and biomedicine. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Springer;2006.
7. Wager KA, Lee FW, Glaser JP. Managing health care information systems: a practical approach for health care executives. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass;2009.
8. Wolper LF. Health care administration: planning, implementing, and managing organized delivery systems. 4th ed. Boston (MA): Jones & Bartlett Publishers;2004.
9. Mohamadali NA, Garibaldi JM. A novel evaluation model of user acceptance of software technology in healthcare sector. In : Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Health Informatics; 2010 Jan 20-23; Valencia, Spain. p. 392–397.
10. Yusof MM, Papazafeiropoulou A, Paul RJ, Stergioulas LK. Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77(6):377–385.
Article
11. Bavier K. Evaluation of a pharmacy HIT system. Durham (NC): School of Nursing, Duke University;2003.
12. Ammenwerth E, Kaiser F, Wilhelmy I, Hofer S. Evaluation of user acceptance of information systems in health care: the value of questionnaires. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003; 95:643–648.
13. Pereira IM, Gaidzinski RR, Fugulin FM, Peres HH, Lima AF, Castilho V, et al. Computerized nursing staffing: a software evaluation. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011; 45 Spec No:1600–1605.
14. Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology. CCHIT Certified: inpatient EHR 2011 certification. Chicago (IL): Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology;2010.
15. Von Ahn L, Blum M, Hopper NJ, Langford J. CAPTCHA: using hard AI problems for security. In : Biham E, editor. Advances in cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2003. Heidelberg: Springer;2003. p. 294–311.
16. Troiano D. A primer on pharmacy information systems. J Healthc Inf Manag. 1999; 13(3):41–52.
17. Pauly A, Wolf C, Busse M, Strauß AC, Krebs S, Dorje F, et al. Evaluation of eight drug interaction databases commonly used in the German healthcare system. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2015; 22(3):165–170.
Article
18. Webster L, Spiro RF. Health information technology: a new world for pharmacy. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2010; 50(2):e20–e31.
Article
19. Kazemi A, Ellenius J, Tofighi S, Salehi A, Eghbalian F, Fors UG. CPOE in Iran: a viable prospect? Physicians' opinions on using CPOE in an Iranian teaching hospital. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(3):199–207.
20. Hines LE, Saverno KR, Warholak TL, Taylor A, Grizzle AJ, Murphy JE, et al. Pharmacists' awareness of clinical decision support in pharmacy information systems: an exploratory evaluation. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2011; 7(4):359–368.
Article
21. Saverno KR, Hines LE, Warholak TL, Grizzle AJ, Babits L, Clark C, et al. Ability of pharmacy clinical decision-support software to alert users about clinically important drug-drug interactions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(1):32–37.
Article
22. Colpaert K, Decruyenaere J. Computerized physician order entry in critical care. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009; 23(1):27–38.
Article
23. Alkelya MA. The influence of the pharmacy information system and pharmacy and therapeutics committee on physician prescribing behavior in the Saudi Ministry of Health: a descriptive cross-sectional comparison study [dissertation]. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison;2006.
24. Asadi F, Hoseini A, Moghadasi H, Maserrat E. Evaluation of pharmacy information systems in the teaching hospitals. HA J. 2010; 41(13):23–35.
25. Anderson PO, McGuinness SM, Bourne PE. Pharmacy informatics. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press;2010.
26. El Mahalli A, El-Khafif SH, Yamani W. Assessment of pharmacy information system performance in three hospitals in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2016; 13:1b.
27. Mahoney CD, Berard-Collins CM, Coleman R, Amaral JF, Cotter CM. Effects of an integrated clinical information system on medication safety in a multi-hospital setting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2007; 64(18):1969–1977.
Article
28. Isfahani SS, Raeisi AR, Ehteshami A, Janesari H, Feizi A, Mirzaeian R. The role of evaluation pharmacy information system in management of medication related complications. Acta Inform Med. 2013; 21(1):26–29.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr