J Breast Cancer.  2014 Jun;17(2):157-160.

Effects of Geometrical Uncertainties on Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Comparison of Four Different Techniques

• Nakamura N
• Takahashi
• Kamo M
• Hatanaka S
• Endo H
• Mizuno N
• Shikama N
• Ogita M
• Sekiguchi

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to quantify the target coverage, homogeneity, and robustness of the dose distributions against geometrical uncertainties associated with four whole breast radiotherapy techniques.
METHODS
The study was based on the planning-computed tomography-datasets of 20 patients who underwent whole breast radiotherapy. A total of four treatment plans (wedge, field-in-field [FIF], hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT], and full IMRT) were created for each patient. The hybrid IMRT plans comprised two opposed tangential open beams plus two IMRT beams. Setup errors were simulated by moving the beam isocenters by 5 mm in the anterior or posterior direction.
RESULTS
With the original plan, the wedge technique yielded a high volume receiving > or =107% of the prescription dose (V107; 7.5%+/-4.2%), whereas the other three techniques yielded excellent target coverage and homogeneity. A 5 mm anterior displacement caused a large and significant increase in the V107 (+5.2%+/-4.1%, p<0.01) with the FIF plan, but not with the hybrid IMRT (+0.4%+/-1.2%, p=0.11) or full IMRT (+0.7%+/-1.8%, p=0.10) plan. A 5-mm posterior displacement caused a large decrease in the V95 with the hybrid IMRT (-2.5%+/-3.7%, p<0.01) and full IMRT (-4.3%+/-5.1%, p<0.01) plans, but not with the FIF plan (+0.1%+/-0.7%, p=0.74). The decrease in V95 was significantly smaller with the hybrid IMRT plan than with the full IMRT plan (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The FIF, hybrid IMRT, and full IMRT plans offered excellent target coverage and homogeneity. Hybrid IMRT provided better robustness against geometrical uncertainties than full IMRT, whereas FIF provided comparable robustness to that of hybrid IMRT.

Keyword

Breast neoplasms; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

MeSH Terms

Breast Neoplasms
Breast*
Humans
Prescriptions
Radiotherapy*
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated

Reference

1. Aref A, Thornton D, Youssef E, He T, Tekyi-Mensah S, Denton L, et al. Dosimetric improvements following 3D planning of tangential breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48:1569–1574.

2. Buchholz TA, Gurgoze E, Bice WS, Prestidge BR. Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 39:261–267.

3. Smith BD, Pan IW, Shih YC, Smith GL, Harris JR, Punglia R, et al. Adoption of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for breast cancer in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103:798–809.

4. Harsolia A, Kestin L, Grills I, Wallace M, Jolly S, Jones C, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy results in significant decrease in clinical toxicities compared with conventional wedge-based breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68:1375–1380.

5. van Mourik A, van Kranen S, den Hollander S, Sonke JJ, van Herk M, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C. Effects of setup errors and shape changes on breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79:1557–1564.

6. Jain P, Marchant T, Green M, Watkins G, Davies J, McCarthy C, et al. Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Radiother Oncol. 2009; 90:93–98.

7. Fan Y, Nath R. Intensity modulation under geometrical uncertainty: a deconvolution approach to robust fluence. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55:4029–4045.

8. Schwarz M, Van der Geer J, Van Herk M, Lebesque JV, Mijnheer BJ, Damen EM. Impact of geometrical uncertainties on 3D CRT and IMRT dose distributions for lung cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65:1260–1269.

9. Bos LJ, van der Geer J, van Herk M, Mijnheer BJ, Lebesque JV, Damen EM. The sensitivity of dose distributions for organ motion and set-up uncertainties in prostate IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2005; 76:18–26.

10. de la Torre N, Figueroa CT, Martinez K, Riley S, Chapman J. A comparative study of surface dose and dose distribution for intact breast following irradiation with field-in-field technique vs. the use of conventional wedges. Med Dosim. 2004; 29:109–114.

11. Nakamura N, Hatanaka S, Shikama N, Akahane K, Sekiguchi K. Quantification of cold spots caused by geometrical uncertainty in field-in-field techniques for whole breast radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011; 41:1127–1131.