J Adv Prosthodont.  2016 Aug;8(4):267-274. 10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.267.

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

• Sari F
• Secilmis A
• Simsek I
• Ozsevik S

• KMID: 2349334
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.4.267

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on bond strength of indirect composite material (Tescera Indirect Composite System) to monolithic zirconia (inCoris TZI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Partially stabilized monolithic zirconia blocks were cut into with 2.0 mm thickness. Sintered zirconia specimens were divided into different surface treatment groups: no treatment (control), sandblasting, glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application, and sandblasting + glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application. The indirect composite material was applied to the surface of the monolithic zirconia specimens. Shear bond strength value of each specimen was evaluated after thermocycling. The fractured surface of each specimen was examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope to assess the failure types. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey LSD tests (α=.05).
RESULTS
Bond strength was significantly lower in untreated specimens than in sandblasted specimens (P<.05). No difference between the glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid application treated groups were observed. However, bond strength for these groups were significantly higher as compared with the other two groups (P<.05).
CONCLUSION
Combined use of glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application and silanization are reliable for strong and durable bonding between indirect composite material and monolithic zirconia.

Keyword

Zirconia; Composite resin; Shear strength; Scanning electron microscopy; Surface properties

MeSH Terms

Hydrofluoric Acid
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Shear Strength
Surface Properties
Hydrofluoric Acid
Lysergic Acid Diethylamide

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 SEM micrographs of monolithic zirconia specimens: (A) control, (B) sandblasting, (C) glaze layer & HF application, (D) sandblasting + glaze layer & HF application.

• 

  Fig. 2 (A) SEM micrograph of monolithic zirconia specimen applied Z-Prime Plus, (B) control group exhibited mixed failure, (C) in the surface of a specimen from the control group, both monolithic zirconia and remnants of Z-Prime Plus and indirect composite material were visible.

• 

  Fig. 3 SEM micrographs of monolithic zirconia specimens. (A) sandblasted group exhibited mixed failure, (B) remnants of Z-Prime Plus and indirect composite material were seen in the surface of sandblasted specimen, (C) glaze layer & HF application group exhibited mixed failure, (D) in the glaze layer & HF application group, the indirect composite material on the monolithic zirconia was observed.

Reference

1. Oliveira-Ogliari A, Collares FM, Feitosa VP, Sauro S, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR. Methacrylate bonding to zirconia by in situ silica nanoparticle surface deposition. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:68–76.

2. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater. 2013; 29:e113–e121.

3. Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, Mohamed SE. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 108:214–222.

4. Worni A, Kolgeci L, Rentsch-Kollar A, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Zirconia-based screw-retained prostheses supported by implants: a retrospective study on technical complications and failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17:1073–1081.

5. Tartaglia GM, Sidoti E, Sforza C. Seven-year prospective clinical study on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19:1137–1145.

6. Monaco C, Caldari M, Scotti R. AIOP (Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry) Clinical Research Group. Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry) Clinical Research Group. Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based restorations on implants: a retrospective cohort study from the AIOP clinical research group. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28:239–242.

7. Sadid-Zadeh R, Liu PR, Aponte-Wesson R, O'Neal SJ. Maxillary cement retained implant supported monolithic zirconia prosthesis in a full mouth rehabilitation: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5:209–217.

8. Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; 35:315–323.

9. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, Örtengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015; 73:602–608.

10. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D'Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114:506–512.

11. Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int. 2013; 44:557–566.

12. Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, Takanashi T, Furuya K, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dent Mater J. 2015; 34:910–917.

13. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26:224–231.

14. Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent. 2015; 43:133–139.

15. Ramos GF, Monteiro EB, Bottino MA, Zhang Y, Marques de Melo R. Failure probability of three designs of zirconia crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2015; 35:843–849.

16. Lee SY, Vang MS, Yang HS, Park SW, Park HO, Lim HP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009; 1:68–74.

17. Kanat B, Cömlekoğlu EM, Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M, Hakan Sen B, Ozcan M, Ali Güngör M. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs. J Prosthodont. 2014; 23:445–455.

18. Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the short-term bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40:545–551.

19. Komine F, Fushiki R, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Kamio S, Matsumura H. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength between an indirect composite material and a zirconia framework. J Oral Sci. 2012; 54:39–46.

20. Fushiki R, Komine F, Blatz MB, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite layering material and feldspathic porcelain-coated zirconia ceramics. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16:1401–1411.

21. Koizuka M, Komine F, Blatz MB, Fushiki R, Taguchi K, Matsumura H. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite veneering material to three implant framework materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24:977–984.

22. Komine F, Taguchi K, Fushiki R, Kamio S, Iwasaki T, Matsumura H. In vitro comparison of fracture load of implant-supported, zirconia-based, porcelain- and composite-layered restorations after artificial aging. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33:607–613.

23. Su N, Yue L, Liao Y, Liu W, Zhang H, Li X, Wang H, Shen J. The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7:214–223. Erratum in: J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:506.

24. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratory-processed resin composites. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:393–398.

25. Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013; 38:E1–E11.

26. Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, Erdem V, Seven N, Demirbuga S. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013; 18:e521–e528.

27. Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent. 2006; 31:719–727.

28. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Seo DG. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent. 2015; 40:63–71.

29. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 91:930–937.

30. Gargari M, Gloria F, Napoli E, Pujia AM. Zirconia: cementation of prosthetic restorations. Literature review. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2010; 3:25–29.

31. Erdem A, Akar GC, Erdem A, Kose T. Effects of different surface treatments on bond strength between resin cements and zirconia ceramics. Oper Dent. 2014; 39:E118–E127.

32. Cura C, Özcan M, Isik G, Saracoglu A. Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for zirconia ceramic: glaze layer vs zirconia primer. J Adhes Dent. 2012; 14:75–82.

33. Everson P, Addison O, Palin WM, Burke FJ. Improved bonding of zirconia substructures to resin using a "glaze-on" technique. J Dent. 2012; 40:347–351.

34. Bottino MA, Bergoli C, Lima EG, Marocho SM, Souza RO, Valandro LF. Bonding of Y-TZP to dentin: effects of Y-TZP surface conditioning, resin cement type, and aging. Oper Dent. 2014; 39:291–300.

35. Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112:182–187.

36. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater. 2012; 28:467–477.

37. Lung CY, Liu D, Matinlinna JP. Silica coating of zirconia by silicon nitride hydrolysis on adhesion promotion of resin to zirconia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015; 46:103–110.