Yonsei Med J.  2015 Nov;56(6):1478-1491. 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1478.

Treatment of Retinoblastoma: The Role of External Beam Radiotherapy

Affiliations
  • 1Proton Therapy Center, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. jooyoungcasa@ncc.re.kr

Abstract

The risk of radiotherapy-related secondary cancers in children with constitutional retinoblastoma 1 (RB1) mutations has led to reduced use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for RB. Presently, tumor reduction with chemotherapy with or without focal surgery (chemosurgery) is most commonly undertaken; EBRT is avoided as much as possible and is considered only as the last treatment option prior to enucleation. Nevertheless, approximately 80% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage, and only 20-25% of early stage RB patients can be cured with a chemosurgery strategy. As a whole, chemotherapy fails in more than two-thirds of eyes with advanced stage disease, requiring EBRT or enucleation. Radiotherapy is still considered necessary for patients with large tumor(s) who are not candidates for chemosurgery but who have visual potential. When radiation therapy is indicated, the lowest possible radiation dose combined with systemic or local chemotherapy and focal surgery may yield the best clinical outcomes in terms of local control and treatment-related toxicity. Proton beam therapy is one EBRT method that can be used for treatment of RB and reduces the radiation dose delivered to the adjacent orbital bone while maintaining an adequate dose to the tumor. To maximize the therapeutic success of treatment of advanced RB, the possibility of integrating radiotherapy at early stages of treatment may need to be discussed by a multidisciplinary team, rather than considering EBRT as only a last treatment option.

Keyword

Retinoblastoma; treatment; external beam radiotherapy

MeSH Terms

Child
Child, Preschool
Eye Neoplasms/genetics
Genes, Retinoblastoma/genetics
Humans
Radiotherapy Dosage
Retinal Neoplasms/*radiotherapy
Retinoblastoma/genetics/*radiotherapy

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cumulative rates of (A) "in-field" or "radiation-induced" secondary malignancies and (B) all secondary malignancies in patients treated with proton beam therapy and photon radiotherapy.

  • Fig. 2 Practices at National Cancer Center, Korea. (A) Under anesthesia, a small suction cup is placed on the cornea and the eyeball is rotated so that the proton beam can maximally avoid the orbital bone while covering the retinal target. (B) Dose distribution in proton beam therapy-initial field (left upper), boost field (right upper), summation of both fields (left lower) and corresponding dose volume histogram for the entire plan (right lower).

  • Fig. 3 Cosmetic outcomes in a patient treated with the radiotherapy plan described in Fig. 2. The patient's right eye was enucleated and the left eye was treated with PBT. Left to right: photos taken prior to PBT, 3 months after completion of PBT, and 6 years after PBT. PBT, proton beam therapy.

  • Fig. 4 Treatment monitoring system used at National Cancer Center, Korea. The position of the eye is monitored in the control room through a CC camera attached to the aperture during treatment. CC, closed-circuit.

  • Fig. 5 Treatment outcome of unilateral RB after PBT. Fundoscopic examination of a 5-year-old boy diagnosed with RB in the right eye. (A) Pre-PBT: endophytic mass obscuring the posterior pole with two satellite masses. (B) During PBT: following the delivery of 2340 cGy, the main mass at the posterior pole has partially regressed, whereas the smaller seeding masses have slightly increased in size. (C) Two weeks after PBT: the main mass has regressed while the seeding masses have remained stable. (D) Three months after PBT: masses have overall remained stable. (E) MRI findings before (left) and after (right) PBT: a lobulated contoured intraocular mass of the right orbit, present before PBT, absent after PBT. RB, retinoblastoma; PBT, proton beam therapy.

  • Fig. 6 Treatment outcome of PBT in a patient with bilateral RB. The patient was diagnosed with bilateral RB and received chemotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) for 1 year. After treatment, the masses regressed and have remained stable for 1.5 years. However, new masses developed in the right eye. PBT was delivered to the mass refractory to TTT. (A) Pre-PBT, showing the re-growth of a solid mass (arrow) at the temporal margin of a previous mass that had regressed. (B, C, and D) Views 1 (B), 2.5 (C), and 8 (D) months after PBT, showing that the main mass had regressed and remained stable for 8 months. Five months after PBT, a hemorrhage developed at the site of the previously regressed mass treated with TTT, and persisted until 8 months after PBT. There has been no evidence of disease to date, but glaucoma developed as a result of hemorrhage. RB, retinoblastoma; PBT, proton beam therapy.


Reference

1. Halperin EC, Constine LS, Tarbell NJ, Kun LE. Pediatric Radiation Oncology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health;2012.
2. Abramson DH. Retinoblastoma: saving life with vision. Annu Rev Med. 2014; 65:171–184.
Article
3. Munier FL, Verwey J, Pica A, Balmer A, Zografos L, Abouzeid H, et al. New developments in external beam radiotherapy for retinoblastoma: from lens to normal tissue-sparing techniques. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2008; 36:78–89.
Article
4. Dimaras H, Kimani K, Dimba EA, Gronsdahl P, White A, Chan HS, et al. Retinoblastoma. Lancet. 2012; 379:1436–1446.
Article
5. Dimaras H, Dimba EA, Gallie BL. Challenging the global retinoblastoma survival disparity through a collaborative research effort. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94:1415–1416.
Article
6. Canadian Retinoblastoma Society. National Retinoblastoma Strategy Canadian Guidelines for Care: Stratégie thérapeutique du rétinoblastome guide clinique canadien. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009; 44:Suppl 2. S1–S88.
7. Manjandavida FP, Honavar SG, Reddy VA, Khanna R. Management and outcome of retinoblastoma with vitreous seeds. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121:517–524.
Article
8. Witkiewicz AK, Ertel A, McFalls J, Valsecchi ME, Schwartz G, Knudsen ES. RB-pathway disruption is associated with improved response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18:5110–5122.
Article
9. Zhao J, Zhang Z, Liao Y, Du W. Mutation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene sensitizes cancers to mitotic inhibitor induced cell death. Am J Cancer Res. 2014; 4:42–52.
10. Zhang M, Stevens G, Madigan MC. In vitro effects of radiation on human retinoblastoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2001; 96:Suppl. 7–14.
Article
11. Svitra PP, Budenz D, Albert DM, Koehler AM, Gragoudas E. Proton beam irradiation for treatment of experimental human retinoblastoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1991; 1:57–62.
Article
12. Cassady JR, Sagerman RH, Tretter P, Ellsworth RM. Radiation therapy in retinoblastoma. An analysis of 230 cases. Radiology. 1969; 93:405–409.
13. Fontanesi J, Pratt CB, Hustu HO, Coffey D, Kun LE, Meyer D. Use of irradiation for therapy of retinoblastoma in children more than 1 year old: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience and review of literature. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1995; 24:321–326.
Article
14. Fontanesi J, Pratt C, Meyer D, Elverbig J, Parham D, Kaste S. Asynchronous bilateral retinoblastoma: the St. Jude Children's Research Hospital experience. Ophthalmic Genet. 1995; 16:109–112.
Article
15. Berry JL, Jubran R, Kim JW, Wong K, Bababeygy SR, Almarzouki H, et al. Long-term outcomes of Group D eyes in bilateral retinoblastoma patients treated with chemoreduction and low-dose IMRT salvage. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60:688–693.
Article
16. Shields CL, Ramasubramanian A, Thangappan A, Hartzell K, Leahey A, Meadows AT, et al. Chemoreduction for group E retinoblastoma: comparison of chemoreduction alone versus chemoreduction plus low-dose external radiotherapy in 76 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:544–551.
Article
17. Ramasubramanian A, Shields CL. Retinoblastoma. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd.;2012.
18. Shields CL, Honavar SG, Meadows AT, Shields JA, Demirci H, Singh A, et al. Chemoreduction plus focal therapy for retinoblastoma: factors predictive of need for treatment with external beam radiotherapy or enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 133:657–664.
Article
19. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Cater J, Shelil A, Meadows AT, Shields JA. Chemoreduction for retinoblastoma. Analysis of tumor control and risks for recurrence in 457 tumors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:329–337.
Article
20. Shields CL, Fulco EM, Arias JD, Alarcon C, Pellegrini M, Rishi P, et al. Retinoblastoma frontiers with intravenous, intra-arterial, periocular, and intravitreal chemotherapy. Eye (Lond). 2013; 27:253–264.
Article
21. Kingston JE, Hungerford JL, Madreperla SA, Plowman PN. Results of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114:1339–1343.
Article
22. Gombos DS, Hungerford J, Abramson DH, Kingston J, Chantada G, Dunkel IJ, et al. Secondary acute myelogenous leukemia in patients with retinoblastoma: is chemotherapy a factor? Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1378–1383.
Article
23. Jairam V, Roberts KB, Yu JB. Historical trends in the use of radiation therapy for pediatric cancers: 1973-2008. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 85:e151–e155.
Article
24. Shinohara ET, DeWees T, Perkins SM. Subsequent malignancies and their effect on survival in patients with retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61:116–119.
Article
25. Abramson DH, Beaverson KL, Chang ST, Dunkel IJ, McCormick B. Outcome following initial external beam radiotherapy in patients with Reese-Ellsworth group Vb retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122:1316–1323.
Article
26. Blach LE, McCormick B, Abramson DH. External beam radiation therapy and retinoblastoma: long-term results in the comparison of two techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 35:45–51.
Article
27. Foote RL, Garretson BR, Schomberg PJ, Buskirk SJ, Robertson DM, Earle JD. External beam irradiation for retinoblastoma: patterns of failure and dose-response analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989; 16:823–830.
Article
28. Hernandez JC, Brady LW, Shields JA, Shields CL, DePotter P, Karlsson UL, et al. External beam radiation for retinoblastoma: results, patterns of failure, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996; 35:125–132.
Article
29. Desjardins L, Chefchaouni MC, Lumbroso L, Levy C, Asselain B, Bours D, et al. Functional results after treatment of retinoblastoma. J AAPOS. 2002; 6:108–111.
Article
30. Messmer EP, Fritze H, Mohr C, Heinrich T, Sauerwein W, Havers W, et al. Long-term treatment effects in patients with bilateral retinoblastoma: ocular and mid-facial findings. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991; 229:309–314.
Article
31. Soussain C, Ricard D, Fike JR, Mazeron JJ, Psimaras D, Delattre JY. CNS complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lancet. 2009; 374:1639–1651.
Article
32. Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Au AK, Czyz C, Leahey A, Meadows AT, et al. The International Classification of Retinoblastoma predicts chemoreduction success. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:2276–2280.
Article
33. Künkele A, Jurklies C, Wieland R, Lohmann D, Bornfeld N, Eggert A, et al. Chemoreduction improves eye retention in patients with retinoblastoma: a report from the German Retinoblastoma Reference Centre. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97:1277–1283.
Article
34. Chan MP, Hungerford JL, Kingston JE, Plowman PN. Salvage external beam radiotherapy after failed primary chemotherapy for bilateral retinoblastoma: rate of eye and vision preservation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:891–894.
Article
35. Cohen VM, Kingston J, Hungerford JL. The success of primary chemotherapy for group D heritable retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93:887–890.
Article
36. Gündüz K, Shields CL, Shields JA, Meadows AT, Gross N, Cater J, et al. The outcome of chemoreduction treatment in patients with Reese-Ellsworth group V retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:1613–1617.
Article
37. Gündüz K, Günalp I, YalçindagXMLLink_XYZ N, Unal E, Taçyildiz N, Erden E, et al. Causes of chemoreduction failure in retinoblastoma and analysis of associated factors leading to eventual treatment with external beam radiotherapy and enucleation. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1917–1924.
Article
38. Krengli M, Hug EB, Adams JA, Smith AR, Tarbell NJ, Munzenrider JE. Proton radiation therapy for retinoblastoma: comparison of various intraocular tumor locations and beam arrangements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 61:583–593.
Article
39. Eldebawy E, Parker W, Abdel Rahman W, Freeman CR. Dosimetric study of current treatment options for radiotherapy in retinoblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82:e501–e505.
Article
40. Sethi RV, Shih HA, Yeap BY, Mouw KW, Petersen R, Kim DY, et al. Second nonocular tumors among survivors of retinoblastoma treated with contemporary photon and proton radiotherapy. Cancer. 2014; 120:126–133.
Article
41. Plowman PN, Kingston JE, Hungerford JL. Prophylactic retinal radiotherapy has an exceptional place in the management of familial retinoblastoma. Br J Cancer. 1993; 68:743–745.
Article
42. Chantada G, Luna-Fineman S, Sitorus RS, Kruger M, Israels T, Leal-Leal C, et al. SIOP-PODC recommendations for graduated-intensity treatment of retinoblastoma in developing countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013; 60:719–727.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr