Korean J Health Promot.  2016 Jun;16(2):101-110. 10.15384/kjhp.2016.16.2.101.

Doctors' Ageism towards the Elderly Cancer Patients: Focusing on Disclosure of Cancer Diagnosis and Explanation on Treatment

Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Aging, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 2Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea. fhdzang@hallym.ac.kr
  • 3Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 4Department of Hematology-Oncology, Aju University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
  • 5Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Social Welfare, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 7Department of Social Welfare, Hallym Polytechnic University, Chuncheon, Korea.
  • 8Department of Social Welfare, Sungkonghoe University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 9Department of Social Welfare, Graduate School of Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
This research is an exploratory study that is based on previous studies focusing on relationship between the doctors and the elderly cancer patients; moreover, the research focuses on the doctors' negative attitudes and discriminative behaviors towards the elderly cancer patients so that we may be able to suggest the ways to decrease the ageism.
METHODS
Qualitative method and quantitative method were applied sequently. In this research, we practiced in-depth interviews with 8 doctors and then the surveys with 274 doctors. The in-depth interview questions were categorized depending on meaningful testimonies and the survey data were analyzed in the descriptive statistic analysis and paired t-test using PASW statistics 18.
RESULTS
Through the in-depth interviews, the following is observed: the doctors rarely notify the elderly cancer patients directly; the family members of patients avoids the doctors to do so; and the doctors even show different attitudes or discriminatory actions to the elderly. Based on the in-depth interview results, the questions on notifying methods of the diagnosis and how to explain for treatment were developed and performed as a survey. Through the survey, only 8.4% of the doctors reported they directly notify the elderly cancer patient; moreover, they also reported they provide less information on treatment, side-effects, prognosis, and medical cost to the elderly than the middle-aged.
CONCLUSIONS
This research not only discovered the presence of discrimination towards the elderly cancer patients but also suggested the causes of it. In order to resolve the phenomenon, doctors must consider individualized difference and variability of physiological function and should be aware of the psychological change after the cancer diagnosis to better communicate with them. Additionally, the social family culture which overprotects the elderly must be changed.

Keyword

Ageism; Cancer; Elderly; Diagnosis

MeSH Terms

Aged*
Ageism*
Diagnosis*
Disclosure*
Discrimination (Psychology)
Humans
Methods
Prognosis

Cited by  1 articles

Experiences of Ego Integrity Recovery in Elderly Cancer Patients: Grounded Theory Approach
Han-Gyo Choi, Hye-Ah Yeom
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019;49(3):349-360.    doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.3.349.


Reference

References

1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47(2):127–41.
Article
2. Wedding U, Pientca L, Höffken K. Quality-of-life in elderly patients with cancer: a short review. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43(15):2203–10.
Article
3. NHS Scotland. Adding life to years: report of the Expert Group on Healthcare of Older People. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive;2001. p. 33–4. 44–55.
4. Lavelle K, Todd C, Moran A, Howell A, Bundred N, Campbell M. Non-standard management of breast cancer increases with age in the UK: a population based cohort of women > or=65 years. Br J Cancer. 2007; 96(8):1197–203.
5. Butler RN. Ageism: another form of bigotry. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(4):243–6.
Article
6. Butler R. Ageism. The encyclopedia of aging. New York: Springer;1987.
7. Chun HR, Kim IH. Ageism and health: focus on socioeconomic factors. J Korean Gerontological Soc. 2013; 33(3):601–5.
8. Palmore EB. Ageism: negative and positive. New York: Springer Publishing Company;1999.
9. Kuypers JA, Bengtson VL. Social breakdown and competence. A model of normal aging. Hum Dev. 1973; 16(3):181–201.
10. Williams PW. Age discrimination in the delivery of health care services to our elders. Marquette Elder's Advisor. 2009; 11(1):3–45.
11. Lim YS, Kim JS, Kim KS. Nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward the elderly. J Korea Gerontological Soc. 2002; 22(1):31–46.
12. Kim C, Kwon Y. The relationship with the knowledge, attitude and nursing practice of the nurses: towards the elderly in geriatric hospital. Keimyung J Nurs Sci. 2009; 13(1):39–50.
13. Park HS, So SR, Kim SH, Relationships among knowledge, attitude, and use of negative control maintenance techniques toward older adults among nurses working in geriatric hospitals. Korean J Acad Adult Nurs. 2007; 19(4):614–23.
14. Sim SH, Kim JS. A study on knowledge of and attitude to the elderly among some dental hygienist. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2010; 10(2):71–7.
15. Jung JY, Yoon SY. Elder care related knowledge, attitudes, nursing practice and awareness of elder abuse in geriatric hospital health personnels. J Korean Gerontological Nurs. 2012; 14(3):233–41.
16. Penson RT, Daniels KJ, Lynch TJ Jr. Too old to care? Oncologist. 2004; 9(3):343–52.
Article
17. The Anti-Ageism Taskforce at The International Longevity Center. Ageism in America. New York: ILC-USA;2006. p. 69–72.
18. Kim W. An exploratory study on ageism experienced by the elderly and its related factors. J Korean Gerontological Soc. 2003; 23(2):21–35.
19. Padgett DK. Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research. Seoul: Nannam Publishing House;2001. p. 237–49.
20. Mystakidou K, Parpa E, Tsilika E, Katsouda E, Vlahos L. Cancer information disclosure in different cultural contexts. Support Care Cancer. 2004; 12(3):147–54.
Article
21. Billings J. Staff perceptions of ageist practice in the clinical setting: practice in the clinical setting: practice development project, Canterbury: University of Kent. Centre for Health Services Studies. 2003. 13–21.
22. Kim HS. Aspects of shared decision making of the medical treatments for older cancer patients [dissertation]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University;2009. Korean.
23. Lee SM, Kim SY, Lee HS. The process of medical decision-making for cancer patients. Korean J Med Ethics. 2009; 12(1):1–14.
24. Healthchosun. Noticing the patient right after the diagnose of the cancer makes the satisfaction of the treatment and the understanding of the process. Reston: Healthchosun;2012. [Accessed October 20, 2015].http://health.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/04/11/2012041100003.html.
25. Lee HJ, Lim YO, Yoon HS, Kim YJ, Choi KW. Post-surgery chemotherapy treatment experiences of older male patients with stomach cancer. J Korean Gerontological Soc. 2014; 34(3):495–521.
26. JoogAng Ilbo. Seosomoon forum: the patient in the last stage of cancer has the right to know. Reston: JoogAng Ilbo, 2013. [Accessed October 20;2015. ].http://news.joins.com/article/11753911.
27. Lee SH, Jung SE. Elderly's Experience on Discrimination. Soc Res. 2010; 19(1):45–68.
Full Text Links
  • KJHP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr