J Korean Soc Radiol.  2013 Dec;69(6):437-447.

Serial Changes of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque: Assessment with 64-Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea. kdklsm@ajou.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the progression of coronary atherosclerotic plaque during follow-up, and its association with cardiovascular risk factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty-six atherosclerotic patients with plaque were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patient's plaque was detected on repeat 64-slice multidetector CT scans with a mean interval of 25 +/- 10 months changes in calcified and non-calcified plaque volumes and cardiovascular risk factors were assessed over time. Absolute and relative changes in plaque volume were compared, and the association between rapid progression and cardiovascular risk factors was determined.
RESULTS
Diameter of the stenosis, length, calcified and non-calcified lesion plaque volumes increased significantly on follow-up CT. Absolute and relative annual changes in plaque volumes were significantly greater in non-calcified plaque (median, 22.7 mm3, 90.4%) than in calcified plaque (median, 0.7 mm3, 0%). Obesity, smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and low high-density lipoprotein were significant predictors of progression of non-calcified plaque. Progression of calcified plaque was not associated with any cardiovascular risk factors.
CONCLUSION
Coronary plaque volume increased significantly on follow-up CT. The rate of progression is related to non-calcified plaque than to calcified plaque. Cardiovascular risk factors are independently associated with the rapid progression of non-calcified plaque volume, but not associated with the progression of calcified plaque.


MeSH Terms

Constriction, Pathologic
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypercholesterolemia
Hypertension
Lipoproteins
Obesity
Plaque, Atherosclerotic*
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Smoke
Smoking
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Lipoproteins
Smoke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Plaque progression in the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery at baseline and at the 20 month follow-up in a 43-year-old male patient. A, B. Agatston calcium score and volume increased from 1.71 to 13.3 and from 5.2 mm2 to 13.3 mm2, respectively. C, D. Stenosis diameter of the proximal LAD lesion progressed from 6% to 57.9% on the curved multiplanar reformation image. E, F. Non-calcified plaque volume increased consistently from 4.6 mm2 at baseline to 10.9 mm2 at follow-up.


Reference

1. Ardehali R, Nasir K, Kolandaivelu A, Budoff MJ, Blumenthal RS. Screening patients for subclinical atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT. Atherosclerosis. 2007; 192:235–242.
2. Clouse ME. How useful is computed tomography for screening for coronary artery disease? Noninvasive screening for coronary artery disease with computed tomography is useful. Circulation. 2006; 113:125–146. discussion 125-146.
3. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, Jang IK, Ferencik M, Rahman AM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:1655–1662.
4. de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW, Davies MJ, Richardson P, Lubsen J, Oliver MF. Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. Circulation. 1991; 84:412–423.
5. Mintz GS, Maehara A. Serial intravascular ultrasound assessment of atherosclerosis progression and regression. State-of-the-art and limitations. Circ J. 2009; 73:1557–1560.
6. Papadopoulou SL, Neefjes LA, Schaap M, Li HL, Capuano E, van der Giessen AG, et al. Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Atherosclerosis. 2011; 219:163–170.
7. Cordeiro MA, Lima JA. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by multidetector row computed tomography angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:8 Suppl. C40–C47.
8. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, Anno H, Inoue K, Hara T, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54:49–57.
9. Leber AW, Becker A, Knez A, von Ziegler F, Sirol M, Nikolaou K, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:672–677.
10. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41:159–168.
11. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285:2486–2497.
12. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. Circulation. 2004; 110:227–239.
13. Schroeder S, Kuettner A, Leitritz M, Janzen J, Kopp AF, Herdeg C, et al. Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004; 28:449–454.
14. Soeda T, Uemura S, Morikawa Y, Ishigami K, Okayama S, Hee SJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: comparison with intravascular optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 148:313–318.
15. Bauer RW, Thilo C, Chiaramida SA, Vogl TJ, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Noncalcified atherosclerotic plaque burden at coronary CT angiography: a better predictor of ischemia at stress myocardial perfusion imaging than calcium score and stenosis severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193:410–418.
16. Maurovich-Horvat P, Ferencik M, Bamberg F, Hoffmann U. Methods of plaque quantification and characterization by cardiac computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009; 3:Suppl 2. S91–S98.
17. Blackmon KN, Streck J, Thilo C, Bastarrika G, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Reproducibility of automated noncalcified coronary artery plaque burden assessment at coronary CT angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2009; 24:96–102.
18. Lee MS, Chun EJ, Kim KJ, Kim JA, Vembar M, Choi SI. Reproducibility in the assessment of noncalcified coronary plaque with 256-slice multi-detector CT and automated plaque analysis software. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 26:Suppl 2. 237–244.
19. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G, Bruining N, Hamers R, Somers P, et al. Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15:1426–1431.
20. Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, Kiguchi M, Shen Y, Althoff CE, Yamamoto H, et al. Soft and intermediate plaques in coronary arteries: how accurately can we measure CT attenuation using 64-MDCT? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189:981–988.
21. Callister TQ, Raggi P, Cooil B, Lippolis NJ, Russo DJ. Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on coronary artery disease as assessed by electron-beam computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1972–1978.
22. Schmermund A, Baumgart D, Möhlenkamp S, Kriener P, Pump H, Grönemeyer D, et al. Natural history and topographic pattern of progression of coronary calcification in symptomatic patients: an electron-beam CT study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21:421–426.
23. Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ropers D, Komatsu S, Ropers U, Daniel WG, et al. Assessment of changes in non-calcified atherosclerotic plaque volume in the left main and left anterior descending coronary arteries over time by 64-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101:579–584.
24. Inoue K, Motoyama S, Sarai M, Sato T, Harigaya H, Hara T, et al. Serial coronary CT angiography-verified changes in plaque characteristics as an end point: evaluation of effect of statin intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 3:691–698.
25. Priester TC, Litwin SE. Measuring progression of coronary atherosclerosis with computed tomography: searching for clarity among shades of gray. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009; 3:Suppl 2. S81–S90.
26. Lehman SJ, Schlett CL, Bamberg F, Lee H, Donnelly P, Shturman L, et al. Assessment of coronary plaque progression in coronary computed tomography angiography using a semiquantitative score. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 2:1262–1270.
27. Fernández-Ortiz A, Badimon JJ, Falk E, Fuster V, Meyer B, Mailhac A, et al. Characterization of the relative thrombogenicity of atherosclerotic plaque components: implications for consequences of plaque rupture. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23:1562–1569.
28. Bamberg F, Dannemann N, Shapiro MD, Seneviratne SK, Ferencik M, Butler J, et al. Association between cardiovascular risk profiles and the presence and extent of different types of coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by multidetector computed tomography. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28:568–574.
29. Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Crowe T, Sipahi I, Schoenhagen P, Kapadia S, et al. Relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic disease burden measured by intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47:1967–1975.
30. Uehara M, Funabashi N, Mikami Y, Shiina Y, Nakamura K, Komuro I. Quantitative effect of atorvastatin on size and content of non-calcified plaques of coronary arteries 1 year after atorvastatin treatment by multislice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2008; 130:269–275.
31. Hoffmann H, Frieler K, Schlattmann P, Hamm B, Dewey M. Influence of statin treatment on coronary atherosclerosis visualised using multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20:2824–2833.
32. Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I, Libby P, Raichlen JS, Ballantyne CM, et al. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA. 2006; 295:1556–1565.
33. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, Gentry R, Mahesh M, Raff GL, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011; 5:198–224.
Full Text Links
  • JKSR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr