Tuberc Respir Dis.  2010 Apr;68(4):212-217.

The Clinical and Pathologic Features according to Expression of Acyl Protein Thioesterase-1 (APT1) in Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khj57@yuhs.ac
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Acyl protein thioesterase-1 (APT1) is a cytosolic protein that may function in the depalmitoylation of numerous proteins, including the Ras family. However, the clinical role of depalmitoyl thioesterase in human cancer is not known. We evaluated the APT1 expression in lung cancer tissue and its clinicopathological findings according APT1 expression pattern.
METHODS
APT1 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in the tumor tissue from 79 patients, who had undergone curative surgical removal of the primary lesion; all patients had been diagnosed with stage I non-small cell lung cancer between 1993 and 2004, at Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
RESULTS
The APT1 expression was seen in 50 out of 79 (63.3%) cases. The positive APT1 expression was significantly related with histologic subtype and T stage, but was not influenced by differentiation. The positive APT1 expression was not significantly related to patient age, gender, or smoking history. The median follow-up duration was 10.0 years; the 5-year survival rate was 71.0%. The positive APT1 expression group showed significantly worse overall survival and worse disease-free survival without statistical significance.
CONCLUSION
We conclude that positive APT1 expression in stage I lung cancer after surgery is closely associated with overall survival. To evaluate APT1 as a prognostic marker in lung cancer, comprehensive studies on advanced stage cases are needed.

Keyword

Acyl protein thioesterase; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Biological Markers

MeSH Terms

Biomarkers
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Cytosol
Disease-Free Survival
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Lung Neoplasms
Proteins
Smoke
Smoking
Survival Rate
Proteins
Smoke

Figure

  • Figure 1 APT1 expression in lung cancer tissues. An adenocarcinoma has no APT1 expression (A), whereas other has strong (B; inset, ×400). Also squamous cell carcinoma shows no expression (C) vs. strong expression (D; inset, ×400). Most of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (E) and large cell carcinoma (F) has no APT1 expression (×200) (Immunohistochemistry).

  • Figure 2 Survival analysis of stage I lung cancer patients according to APT1 expression. The positive expression of APT1 do not significantly influence disease-free survival (A) but showed worse overall survival (B) of lung cancer patients.


Reference

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009. 59:225–249.
2. Subotic D, Mandaric D, Radosavljevic G, Stojsic J, Gajic M, Ercegovac M. Relapse in resected lung cancer revisited: does intensified follow up really matter? A prospective study. World J Surg Oncol. 2009. 7:87.
3. Wang A, Dennis EA. Mammalian lysophospholipases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999. 1439:1–16.
4. Baekkeskov S, Kanaani J. Palmitoylation cycles and regulation of protein function (Review). Mol Membr Biol. 2009. 26:42–54.
5. Sugimoto H, Hayashi H, Yamashita S. Purification, cDNA cloning, and regulation of lysophospholipase from rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1996. 271:7705–7711.
6. Molina JR, Adjei AA. The Ras/Raf/MAPK Pathway. J Thorac Oncol. 2006. 1:7–9.
7. Riely GJ, Marks J, Pao W. KRAS Mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009. 6:201–205.
8. Quatela SE, Philips MR. Ras signaling on the Golgi. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2006. 18:162–167.
9. Chiu VK, Bivona T, Hach A, Sajous JB, Silletti J, Wiener H, et al. Ras signalling on the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi. Nat Cell Biol. 2002. 4:343–350.
10. Johnson L, Mercer K, Greenbaum D, Bronson RT, Crowley D, Tuveson DA, et al. Somatic activation of the K-ras oncogene causes early onset lung cancer in mice. Nature. 2001. 410:1111–1116.
11. Sakuma Y, Matsukuma S, Yoshihara M, Nakamura Y, Noda K, Nakayama H, et al. Distinctive evaluation of nonmucinous and mucinous subtypes of bronchioloalveolar carcinomas in EGFR and K-ras gene-mutation analyses for Japanese lung adenocarcinomas: confirmation of the correlations with histologic subtypes and gene mutations. Am J Clin Pathol. 2007. 128:100–108.
12. Marchetti A, Martella C, Felicioni L, Barassi F, Salvatore S, Chella A, et al. EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of a large series of cases and development of a rapid and sensitive method for diagnostic screening with potential implications on pharmacologic treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2005. 23:857–865.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr