The Clinical significance of STAT-PAT-PAK ULTRA FAST(R) and ICT Tuberculosis for Serologic Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Kim, Geun Hwa; Park, Hee Sun; Kim, Myung Hoon; Kang, Dong Won; Lee, Gyu Seung; Ko, Dong Seok; Suh, Jae Chul; Jeong, Seong Su; Kim, Ju Ock; KIm, Sun Young

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In recent years, tuberculosis has re-emerged as a major health problem in both industrialized and developing countries. Recent advances in identifying and purifying antigens secreted in active tuberculosis infection have lead to the development of serological assays based on a number of immunodominant antigens. To date, the most sensitive and specific of these antigens has been the 38-kDa antigen. METHOD: Two rapid membrane-based serologic assays using antigen(38-kDa) from mycobacterium tuberculosis for the diagnosis of tuberculosis were evaluated in 22 patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis, 14 patients with inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, and 9 patients with non-tuberculous lung disease. RESULT: The evaluation of validity(sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positivity and false negativity) of STAT-PAK ULTRA FAST(R) were 77.3%, 28.6%, 63.0%, 44.4%, 71.4%, and 22.7% for differential diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis, respectively. The evaluation of validity of STAT-PAK ULTRA FAST(R) were 77.3%, 33.3%, 73.9%, 37.5%, 66.7%, and 22.7% for differential diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis. The evaluation of validity of ICT Tuberculosis were 54.5%, 57%, 66.7%, 44.4%, 42.9%, and 45.5% for differential diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis and inactive pulmonary tuberculosis. The evaluation of validity of ICT Tuberculosis were 54.5%, 100%, 100%, 47.4%, 0%, and 45.4% for differential diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis.
CONCLUSION
We concluded no effectiveness of STAT-PAK ULTRA FAST(R) and ICT tuberculosis on serologic diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. In the future, further large-scale study should be needed for serologic diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.