Restor Dent Endod.  2014 Aug;39(3):210-214.

Prevalence of referral reasons and clinical symptoms for endodontic referrals

• Kim S

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
To investigate the prevalence of different primary reasons for endodontic referrals and the clinical symptoms of the referred cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clinical data of total endodontic treatment cases (1,014 teeth) including endodontic referral cases (224 teeth) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012, at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, were investigated retrospectively. The one major reason for referral, the clinical symptoms, and the resulting treatment procedures of referral cases were recorded. The percentages of clinical symptoms of the endodontic referral cases and the total endodontic treatment cases were compared by chi2 test for each symptom.
RESULTS
Persistent pain was the most frequent reason for endodontic referral (29.5%), followed by presence of gingival swelling and sinus tract (24.1%), and apical radiolucency (12.9%). Referrals in cases involving endodontic difficulties such as canal calcification, broken instruments, post, perforation, and resorption were less than 5.0%, respectively. The percentages of four major clinical symptoms of pain, apical radiolucency, previous endodontic treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract were significantly higher in the endodontic referral cases than those in the total endodontic cases (p = 0.001). Among the included referral cases, 72.8% were treated with nonsurgical endodontic treatment only. Teeth other than the referred teeth were diagnosed as the origin of the problem in 5.8% of the referrals.
CONCLUSIONS
The high prevalence of pain, apical radiolucency, previous treatment, and gingival swelling and sinus tract in endodontic referral cases suggest that these symptoms may be what general practitioners consider to be difficult and refer to endodontists.

Keyword

Apical radiolucency; Endodontic referral; Gingival swelling; Pain; Previous endodontic treatment

MeSH Terms

General Practitioners
Heart
Humans
Prevalence*
Referral and Consultation*
Retrospective Studies
Tooth

Reference

1. Abbott JA, Wolcott JF, Gordon G, Terlap HT. Survey of general dentists to identify characteristics associated with increased referrals to endodontists. J Endod. 2011; 37:1191–1196.

2. Barnes JJ, Patel S, Mannocci F. Why do general dental practitioners refer to a specific specialist endodontist in practice? Int Endod J. 2011; 44:21–32.

3. Ree MH, Timmerman MF, Wesselink PR. Factors influencing referral for specialist endodontic treatment amongst a group of Dutch general practitioners. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:129–134.

4. Messer HH. Clinical judgement and decision making in endodontics. Aust Endod J. 1999; 25:124–132.

5. Pothukuchi K. Case assessment and treatment planning: what governs your decision to treat, refer or replace a tooth that potentially requires endodontic treatment? Aust Endod J. 2006; 32:79–84.

6. Abbott PV. Analysis of a referral-based endodontic practice: Part 1. Demographic data and reasons for referral. J Endod. 1994; 20:93–96.

7. Touré B, Faye B, Kane AW, Lo CM, Niang B, Boucher Y. Analysis of reasons for extraction of endodontically treated teeth: a prospective study. J Endod. 2011; 37:1512–1515.

8. Tzimpoulas NE, Alisafis MG, Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG. A prospective study of the extraction and retention incidence of endodontically treated teeth with uncertain prognosis after endodontic referral. J Endod. 2012; 38:1326–1329.

9. Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Reasons for extraction of permanent teeth in Greece: a five-year follow-up study. Int dent J. 2011; 61:19–24.

10. American Association of Endodontists. AAE Endodontic case difficulty assessment form and guidelines. updated 2013 Oct 31. Available from: http://www.aae.org/uploadedfiles/dental_professionals/endodontic_case_assessment/2006casedifficultyassessmentformb_edited2010.pdf.

11. Hommez GM, De Moor RJ, Braem M. Endodontic treatment performed by Flemish dentists. Part 2. Canal filling and decision making for referrals and treatment of apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 2003; 36:344–351.

12. Tsesis I, Rosenberg E, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Katz M, Rosen E. Prevalence and associated periodontal status of teeth with root perforation: a retrospective study of 2,002 patients' medical records. J Endod. 2010; 36:797–800.

13. Tzanetakis GN, Kontakiotis EG, Maurikou DV, Marzelou MP. Prevalence and management of instrument fracture in the postgraduate endodontic program at the Dental School of Athens: a five-year retrospective clinical study. J Endod. 2008; 34:675–678.

14. Doornbusch H, Broersma L, Boering G, Wesselink PR. Radiographic evaluation of cases referred for surgical endodontics. Int Endod J. 2002; 35:472–477.

15. Harty FJ. A survey of endodontic procedures performed by practitioners in limited practice. Int Endod J. 1992; 25:25–28.