Korean J Urol.  2010 Feb;51(2):80-87.

Current Trends in Pediatric Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatric Urology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California (USC) Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, USC, Los Angeles, California, USA. ckoh@chla.usc.edu

Abstract

Over the past two decades, laparoscopic and robotic surgery in children has been described as a viable minimally invasive alternative to open surgery for many pediatric urologic conditions. With the goal of reducing the morbidity associated with open surgery, minimally invasive surgery in children is increasingly being performed as laparoscopic and robotic patients appear to be experiencing shorter hospital stays, decreased pain medication requirements, and the potential for improved cosmesis. This article provides an overview of the existing literature in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery in children. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery appears to be safe and effective in children for a wide range of ablative and reconstructive procedures. Conventional laparoscopic surgery is effective for ablative procedures, while robotic surgery may be ideally suited for reconstructive cases requiring advanced suturing and dissection. Overall, more prospective studies are needed to study the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery in pediatric patients, and the appropriate use of the available technology.

Keyword

Laparoscopy; Robotics; Urology; Pediatrics

MeSH Terms

Child
Humans
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Pediatrics
Robotics
Urology

Reference

1. Cortesi N, Ferrari P, Zambarda E, Manenti A, Baldini A, Morano FP. Diagnosis of bilateral abdominal cryptorchidism by laparoscopy. Endoscopy. 1976; 8:33–34. PMID: 16743.
Article
2. Docimo SG, Peters CA. Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Pediatric endourology and laparoscopy. Campbell-Walsh urology. 2007. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;p. 3907–3929.
3. Sweeney DD, Smaldone MC, Docimo SG. Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007; 4:26–38. PMID: 17211423.
Article
4. Hyams ES, Stifelman MD. The role of robotics for adrenal pathology. Curr Opin Urol. 2009; 19:89–96. PMID: 19057223.
Article
5. Gill IS. The case for laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol. 2001; 166:429–436. PMID: 11458042.
Article
6. Kebebew E, Siperstein AE, Clark OH, Duh QY. Results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for suspected and unsuspected malignant adrenal neoplasms. Arch Surg. 2002; 137:948–951. PMID: 12146996.
Article
7. Moinzadeh A, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical adrenalectomy for malignancy in 31 patients. J Urol. 2005; 173:519–525. PMID: 15643237.
Article
8. Mirallié E, Leclair MD, de Lagausie P, Weil D, Plattner V, Duverne C, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in children. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:156–160. PMID: 11285959.
Article
9. Skarsgard ED, Albanese CT. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adrenalectomy in children. Arch Surg. 2005; 140:905–908. PMID: 16175699.
Article
10. Iwanaka T, Arai M, Ito M, Kawashima H, Yamamoto K, Hanada R, et al. Surgical treatment for abdominal neuroblastoma in the laparoscopic era. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15:751–754. PMID: 11591983.
Article
11. Cheng SP, Saunders BD, Gauger PG, Doherty GM. Laparoscopic partial adrenalectomy for bilateral pheochromocytomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008; 15:2506–2508. PMID: 18618188.
Article
12. Norris RD, Ost MC. Evolution of laparoscopy in pediatric urology. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2009; 6:689–698. PMID: 19911879.
Article
13. Desai MM, Gill IS, Kaouk JH, Matin SF, Sung GT, Bravo EL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology. 2002; 60:1104–1107. PMID: 12475680.
Article
14. Undre S, Munz Y, Moorthy K, Martin S, Rockall T, Vale J, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: preliminary UK results. BJU Int. 2004; 93:357–359. PMID: 14764137.
Article
15. Krane LS, Shrivastava A, Eun D, Narra V, Bhandari M, Menon M. A four-step technique of robotic right adrenalectomy: initial experience. BJU Int. 2008; 101:1289–1292. PMID: 18279451.
Article
16. Casale P, Kojima Y. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology: an update. Scand J Surg. 2009; 98:110–119. PMID: 19799048.
Article
17. Borzi PA, Yeung CK. Selective approach for transperitoneal and extraperitoneal endoscopic nephrectomy in children. J Urol. 2004; 171:814–816. PMID: 14713831.
Article
18. Kim C, McKay K, Docimo SG. Laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: systematic review of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. Urology. 2009; 73:280–284. PMID: 18952262.
Article
19. El-Ghoneimi A, Abou-Hashim H, Bonnard A, Verkauskas G, Macher MA, Huot O, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: At last the gold standard? J Pediatr Urol. 2006; 2:357–363. PMID: 18947636.
Article
20. Hamilton BD, Gatti JM, Cartwright PC, Snow BW. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in the pediatric population. J Urol. 2000; 163:937–939. PMID: 10688024.
Article
21. Mahomed AA, Hoare C, Welsh F, Driver CP. A two-center experience with the exclusive use of laparoscopic transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign renal disease in children. Surg Endosc. 2007; 21:1532–1536. PMID: 17342559.
Article
22. Duarte RJ, Dénes FT, Cristofani LM, Odone-Filho V, Srougi M. Further experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy for Wilms' tumour after chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2006; 98:155–159. PMID: 16831161.
Article
23. Johnson KC, Cha DY, DaJusta DG, Barone JG, Ankem MK. Pediatric single-port-access nephrectomy for a multicystic, dysplastic kidney. J Pediatr Urol. 2009; 5:402–404. PMID: 19403335.
Article
24. Casale P, Kojima Y. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. AUA Update Series. 2009; 28:286–291.
25. Casale P. Robotic pediatric urology. Curr Urol Rep. 2009; 10:115–118. PMID: 19239815.
Article
26. Jednak R, Kryger JV, Barthold JS, González R. A simplified technique for upper pole heminephrectomy for duplex kidney. J Urol. 2000; 164:1326–1328. PMID: 10992406.
27. Plaire JC, Pope JC 4th, Kropp BP, Adams MC, Keating MA, Rink RC, et al. Management of ectopic ureters: experience with upper tract approach. J Urol. 1997; 158:1245–1247. PMID: 9258185.
28. Husmann DA, Ewalt DH, Glenski WJ, Bernier PA. Ureterocele associated with ureteral duplication and a non-functioning upper pole segment: management by partial nephrectomy alone. J Urol. 1995; 154:723–726. PMID: 7609163.
29. Jordan GH, Winslow BH. Laparoendoscopic upper pole partial nephrectomy with ureterectomy. J Urol. 1993; 150:940–943. PMID: 8345614.
Article
30. Horowitz M, Shah SM, Ferzli G, Syad PI, Glassberg KI. Laparoscopic partial upper pole nephrectomy in infants and children. BJU Int. 2001; 87:514–516. PMID: 11298046.
Article
31. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Diamond DA, Peters CA. Pediatric retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison with an age matched cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2005; 174:708–711. PMID: 16006955.
Article
32. Wallis MC, Khoury AE, Lorenzo AJ, Pippi-Salle JL, Bägli DJ, Farhat WA. Outcome analysis of retroperitoneal laparoscopic heminephrectomy in children. J Urol. 2006; 175:2277–2282. PMID: 16697855.
Article
33. Gonzalez R. Editorial comments. J Urol. 2010; Epub ahead of print.
34. Lee RS, Sethi AS, Passerotti CC, Retik AB, Borer JG, Nguyen HT, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a viable and safe option in children. J Urol. 2009; 181:823–829. PMID: 19110277.
Article
35. Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL. Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1977; 118:162–165. PMID: 875213.
Article
36. Lowe FC, Marshall F. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology. 1984; 23:331–335. PMID: 6369711.
Article
37. Kavoussi LR, Peters CA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993; 150:1891–1894. PMID: 8230528.
Article
38. Casale P, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Zeltser IS, Figueroa TE, Mitchell ME. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient. J Endourol. 2004; 18:875–878. PMID: 15659924.
Article
39. Reddy M, Nerli RB, Bashetty R, Ravish IR. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005; 174:700–702. PMID: 16006953.
Article
40. Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, Truss M, Ure BM. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol. 2006; 175:688–691. PMID: 16407027.
Article
41. El-Ghoneimi A, Farhat W, Bolduc S, Bagli D, McLorie G, Aigrain Y, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children. BJU Int. 2003; 92:104–108. PMID: 12823392.
Article
42. Bonnard A, Fouquet V, Carricaburu E, Aigrain Y, El-Ghoneimi A. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005; 173:1710–1713. PMID: 15821565.
Article
43. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Jenkins LC, Williot P, Greenfield SP. Pediatric pyeloplasty: comparison of literature meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open techniques with open surgery at a single institution. J Urol. 2009; 182:2428–2432. PMID: 19765755.
Article
44. Muneer A, Arya M, Shergill IS, Sharma D, Hammadeh MY, Mushtaq I. Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008; 24:973–977. PMID: 18668251.
Article
45. Casale P. Robotic pediatric urology. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008; 5:59–64. PMID: 18095897.
Article
46. Atug F, Woods M, Burgess SV, Castle EP, Thomas R. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J Urol. 2005; 174:1440–1442. PMID: 16145459.
Article
47. Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant-lessons learned. J Urol. 2006; 176:2237–2239. PMID: 17070302.
Article
48. Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG, Peters CA. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006; 175:683–687. PMID: 16407025.
Article
49. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YF, Jorgensen TM. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience. J Urol. 2007; 178:2137–2141. PMID: 17870122.
Article
50. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2001; 87:287–289. PMID: 11251517.
51. Ehrlich RM, Gershman A, Fuchs G. Laparoscopic vesicoureteroplasty in children: initial case reports. Urology. 1994; 43:255–261. PMID: 8116127.
Article
52. Janetschek G, Radmayr C, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic ureteral anti-reflux plasty reimplantation. First clinical experience. Ann Urol (Paris). 1995; 29:101–105. PMID: 7645993.
53. Lakshmanan Y, Fung LC. Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances. J Endourol. 2000; 14:589–593. PMID: 11030542.
54. Gatti JM, Cartwright PC, Hamilton BD, Snow BW. Percutaneous endoscopic trigonoplasty in children: long-term outcomes and modifications in technique. J Endourol. 1999; 13:581–584. PMID: 10597129.
Article
55. Cartwright PC. Percutaneous endoscopic trigonoplasty: a minimally invasive approach to correct vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol. 1996; 156(2 Suppl 1):661–664. PMID: 8683754.
Article
56. Yeung CK, Sihoe JD, Borzi PA. Endoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation under carbon dioxide bladder insufflation: a novel technique. J Endourol. 2005; 19:295–299. PMID: 15865516.
Article
57. Kutikov A, Guzzo TJ, Canter DJ, Casale P. Initial experience with laparoscopic transvesical ureteral reimplantation at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. J Urol. 2006; 176:2222–2225. PMID: 17070297.
Article
58. Lendvay T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of vesicoureteral reflux. Adv Urol. 2008; 732942. PMID: 18682821.
Article
59. Casale P, Patel RP, Kolon TF. Nerve sparing robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation. J Urol. 2008; 179:1987–1989. PMID: 18355846.
Article
60. Peters CA, Woo R. Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol. 2005; 19:618–621. PMID: 16053348.
Article
61. Casale P, Feng WC, Grady RW, Joyner BD, Lee RS, Mitchell ME. Intracorporeal laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy: a case report of a novel approach. J Urol. 2004; 171:1899. PMID: 15076303.
Article
62. Pedraza R, Weiser A, Franco I. Laparoscopic appendicovesicostomy (Mitrofanoff procedure) in a child using the da Vinci robotic system. J Urol. 2004; 171:1652–1653. PMID: 15017258.
Article
63. Thakre AA, Yeung CK, Peters C. Robot-assisted Mitrofanoff and Malone antegrade continence enema reconstruction using divided appendix. J Endourol. 2008; 22:2393–2396. PMID: 18937604.
Article
64. Casale P, Grady RW, Feng WC, Joyner BD, Mitchell ME. A novel approach to the laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure: intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques. J Urol. 2004; 171:817–819. PMID: 14713832.
Article
65. Lendvay TS, Shnorhavorian M, Grady RW. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and antegrade continent enema colon tube creation in a pediatric spina bifida patient. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008; 18:310–312. PMID: 18373465.
Article
66. Docimo SG, Moore RG, Adams J, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic bladder augmentation using stomach. Urology. 1995; 46:565–569. PMID: 7571231.
Article
67. Chung SY, Meldrum K, Docimo SG. Laparoscopic assisted reconstructive surgery: a 7-year experience. J Urol. 2004; 171:372–375. PMID: 14665934.
Article
68. Lorenzo AJ, Cerveira J, Farhat WA. Pediatric laparoscopic ileal cystoplasty: complete intracorporeal surgical technique. Urology. 2007; 69:977–981. PMID: 17482947.
Article
69. Gundeti MS, Eng MK, Reynolds WS, Zagaja GP. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy: complete intracorporeal--initial case report. Urology. 2008; 72:1144–1147. PMID: 18804263.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr