Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2015 Jul;58(4):294-301. 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.294.

Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for ovarian mature cystic teratoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. jhnam@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in women with ovarian mature cystic teratoma.
METHODS
A retrospective review of 303 women who underwent LESS (n=139) or conventional laparoscopic surgery (n=164) due to ovarian mature cystic teratoma was performed. Intra- and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
There was no intergroup difference in age, body weight, height, body mass index, comorbidities, tumor size, bilaterality of tumor, or the type of surgery. However, more patients in the LESS group had a history of previous abdominal surgery (19.4% vs. 6.7%, P=0.001). Surgical outcomes including operating time (89 vs. 87.8 minutes, P=0.734), estimated blood loss (69.4 vs. 68.4 mL, P=0.842), transfusion requirement (2.2% vs. 0.6%, P=0.336), perioperative hemoglobin level change (1.3 vs. 1.2 g/dL, P=0.593), postoperative hospital stay (2.0 vs. 2.1 days, P=0.119), and complication rate (1.4% vs. 1.8%, P=0.999) did not differ between LESS and conventional groups. Postoperative pain scores measured using a visual analogue scale were significantly lower in the LESS group at 8 hours (P=0.021), 16 hours (P=0.034), and 32 hours (P=0.004) after surgery, and 32 of 139 patients (23%) in the LESS group and 78 of 164 patients (47.6%) in the conventional group required at least one additional analgesic (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
LESS was feasible and showed comparable surgical outcomes with conventional laparoscopic surgery for women with ovarian mature cystic teratoma. LESS was associated with less postoperative pain and required less analgesia.

Keyword

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery; Laparoscopes; Mature cystic teratoma; Ovary; Single-port

MeSH Terms

Analgesia
Body Height
Body Weight
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Laparoscopes
Laparoscopy*
Length of Stay
Ovary
Pain, Postoperative
Retrospective Studies
Teratoma*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (left) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (right) for ovarian mature cystic teratoma. Placement of ports (A,B). Ovarian mature cystic teratoma (C,D). Remained ovaries after ovarian cystectomy (E,F). Abdominal wounds after surgery (G,H).


Cited by  1 articles

Effect of bupivacaine versus lidocaine local anesthesia on postoperative pain reduction in single-port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery using propensity score matching
Ji Hyun Lee, Sang Hyun Cho, Kyung Jin Eoh, Jung-Yun Lee, Eun Ji Nam, Sunghoon Kim, Sang Wun Kim, Young Tae Kim
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020;63(3):363-369.    doi: 10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.363.


Reference

1. Gordon A, Rosenshein N, Parmley T, Bhagavan B. Benign cystic teratomas in postmenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138:1120–1123.
2. Koonings PP, Campbell K, Mishell DR Jr, Grimes DA. Relative frequency of primary ovarian neoplasms: a 10-year review. Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74:921–926.
3. Yuen PM, Yu KM, Yip SK, Lau WC, Rogers MS, Chang A. A randomized prospective study of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of benign ovarian masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177:109–114.
4. Mecke H, Savvas V. Laparoscopic surgery of dermoid cysts: intraoperative spillage and complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 96:80–84.
5. Lin P, Falcone T, Tulandi T. Excision of ovarian dermoid cyst by laparoscopy and by laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173(3 Pt 1):769–771.
6. Lim MC, Kim TJ, Kang S, Bae DS, Park SY, Seo SS. Embryonic natural orifice transumbilical endoscopic surgery (E-NOTES) for adnexal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:2445–2449.
7. Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ, Kim CJ, Kang H, Choi CH, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16:612–615.
8. Escobar PF, Bedaiwy MA, Fader AN, Falcone T. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease. Fertil Steril. 2010; 93:2074.e7–2074.e10.
9. Jung YW, Choi YM, Chung CK, Yim GW, Lee M, Lee SH, et al. Single port transumbilical laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions: a single center experience in Korea. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 155:221–224.
10. Kim WC, Lee JE, Kwon YS, Koo YJ, Lee IH, Lim KT. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for adnexal tumors: one surgeon's initial experience over a one-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 158:265–268.
11. Takeda A, Imoto S, Mori M, Nakano T, Nakamura H. Isobaric laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with wound retractor for adnexal tumors: a single center experience with the initial 100 cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 157:190–196.
12. Roh HJ, Lee SJ, Ahn JW, Kwon YS, Cho HJ, Kim DY. Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2012; 26:693–703.
13. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, Park HS, Choi CH, Lee JW, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of peri-operative outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010; 151:181–184.
14. Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Marocco F, Gallotta V, Bottoni C, Scambia G, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) versus conventional laparoscopy for adnexal disease: a case. Control study. Surg Innov. 2011; 18:29–33.
15. Bedaiwy MA, Starks D, Hurd W, Escobar PF. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in patients with benign adnexal disease: a comparative study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012; 73:294–298.
16. Yim GW, Lee M, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT, Kim SW. Is single-port access laparoscopy less painful than conventional laparoscopy for adnexal surgery? A comparison of postoperative pain and surgical outcomes. Surg Innov. 2013; 20:46–54.
17. Murji A, Patel VI, Leyland N, Choi M. Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121:819–828.
18. Lee IO, Yoon JW, Chung D, Yim GW, Nam EJ, Kim S, et al. A comparison of clinical and surgical outcomes between laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery and traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014; 57:386–392.
19. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy using a single-umbilical puncture (mini-laparoscopy). J Reprod Med. 1992; 37:777–784.
20. Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N J Med. 1991; 88:721–726.
21. Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23:1419–1427.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr