Nutr Res Pract.  2011 Feb;5(1):73-79.

Importance of relationship quality and communication on foodservice for the elderly

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Nutritional Sciences & Food Management, Ewha Womans University, 305 Human Ecology Building, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 120-750, Korea. seo@ewha.ac.kr
  • 2University of Houston, 229 C N. Hilton Hotel and College Houston, TX 77204-3028, USA.
  • 3Department of Hospitality Management and Dietetics, Kansas State University, 103 Fairchild, Manhattan KS 66506-1103, USA.

Abstract

In order to promote foodservice for the elderly, foodservice managers in Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) must identify the main factors to enhance the satisfaction and behavioral intentions with food service. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between relationship quality (consisting of trust, commitment, and satisfaction) and communication in the formation of elderly's behavioral intentions with food services at CCRCs. A survey was administered to residents in two CCRCs and a total of 327 residents participated. A tested structural equation model exhibited good model fit and explanatory power of the study construct. Satisfaction directly influenced word-of-mouth and service quality has an influence on commitment. Commitment was a significant determinant of behavioral intentions to eat more often in the dining room. Also, communication showed positive association with trust. The results provided strong evidence for the importance of satisfaction and communication as a consequence of relationship marketing efforts. Suggestions for future research to better understand the elderly' behavioral intention judgments were given.

Keyword

Elderly; food service; satisfaction; communication; relationship quality

MeSH Terms

Aged
Food Services
Humans
Intention
Judgment
Marketing
Retirement

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Empirical model for testing hypotheses. Service quality (SQ); Communication (COM); satisfaction (SAT); Commitment (COMMT); Intentions to say positive things about foodservice (WOM); Revisit intentions to eat more often in the dining room (RI)


Reference

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [Internet]. c1997. cited 2001 March 12. USA: Continuing care retirement communities;Available from: http://aspe.os.dhss.gov/daltcp/Reports/ccrcrpt.htm.
2. Administration on Aging [Internet]. c2003. cited 2009 July 13. USA: Housing with services: CCRC;Available from: http://www.aoa.dhhs.gov/eldfam/housing/housing_services/ccrc.asp.
3. Amarantos E, Martinez A, Dwyer J. Nutrition and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol. 2001. 56:54–64.
Article
4. Garbarino E, Johnson M. The difference roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J Mark. 1999. 63:70–87.
Article
5. Smith JB. Buyer-seller relationships: Bonds, relationship management, and sex-type. Can J Adm Sci. 1998. 15:76–92.
Article
6. Scotti DJ, Stinerock RN. Cognitive predictors of satisfaction with hospital inpatient service encounters among the elderly: A matter of trust. J Hosp Mark. 2003. 14:3–22.
Article
7. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. 1989. Edina: Interaction Book Co.
8. Lewicki RJ, Bunker BB. Kramer RM, Tyler TR, editors. Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks. 1996. 114–139.
Article
9. Moore JR, Gilbert DA. Elderly residents: Perceptions of nurses' comforting touch. J Gerontol Nurs. 1995. 21:6–13.
Article
10. Morgan RM, Hunt SD. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Mark. 1994. 58:20–38.
Article
11. Dai Y. Overall Customer satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer voluntary performance behaviors with travelers in lodging services. 2002. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University;[doctor's thesis].
12. Singh J, Sirdeshmukh D. Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. J Academy Marks Science. 2000. 28:150–167.
Article
13. Tax SS, Brown SW, Chandrashekaran M. Customer evaluations of service complaint experiences: Implications for relationship marketing. J Mark. 1998. 62:60–76.
Article
14. Hennig-Thurau T, Klee A. The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development. Psychology & Marks. 1997. 14:737–765.
Article
15. Spreng RA, Mackoy RD. An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction. J Retailing. 1996. 72:201–214.
Article
16. Gotlieb JB, Grewal D, Brown SW. Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality: complementary or divergent construct? J Appl Psychol. 1994. 79:875–885.
Article
17. Dabholkar PA, Shepherd CD, Thorpe DI. A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study. J Retailing. 2000. 76:139–173.
Article
18. Reynolds KE, Beatty SE. Customer benefits and company consequences of customer salesperson relationships in retailing. J Retailing. 1999. 75:11–32.
Article
19. Moorman C, Zaltman G, Deshpande R. Relationship between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organization. J Mark Res. 1992. 29:314–328.
Article
20. Bolton RN. A dynamic model of the duration of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marks Science. 1998. 17:45–65.
Article
21. Cronin Jr, Taylor SA. Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. J Mark. 1992. 56:55–68.
Article
22. Crosby LA, Evans RE, Cowles D. Relationship quality in services selling: An integrative influence perspective. J Mark. 1990. 54:68–81.
Article
23. Anderson E, Lodish LM, Weitz BA. Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels. J Mark Res. 1987. 24:85–97.
Article
24. de Wulf K, Odekerken-Schröder G, Iacobucci D. Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. J Mark. 2001. 65:33–50.
Article
25. Fu Y, Parks SC. The relationship between restaurant service quality and consumer loyalty among the elderly. J Hospitality Tourism Res. 2001. 25:320–336.
Article
26. Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Organ Psychol. 1990. 63:1–18.
Article
27. Anderson E, Lodish LM, Weitz BA. Resource allocation behavior in conventional channels. J Mark Res. 1987. 4:85–97.
Article
28. Seo SH, Shanklin CW. Food and service quality attributes important to residents living in continuing care retirement communities. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003. 103:200.
Article
29. Nunnually JC. Psychometric Theory. 1987. 2nd ed. New York: Mc Grow-Hill.
30. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981. 18:39–50.
Article
31. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988. 103:411–423.
Article
32. Caceres RC, Paparoidamis NG. Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment and business-to-business loyalty. Eur J Mark. 2007. 41:836–867.
Article
33. Chen ZX, Shi Y, Dong DH. An empirical study of relationship quality in a service setting: a Chinese case. Marks Intelligence & Plan. 2008. 26:11–25.
34. Um S, Chon K, Ro YH. Antecedents of revisit intention. Annals Tourism Res. 2006. 33:1141–1158.
Article
35. Babin BJ, Lee YK, Kim E, Griffin M. Modeling consumer satisfaction and word-of-mouth: restaurant patronage in Korea. J Serv Mark. 2005. 19:133–139.
Article
36. Kau A, Loh EW. The effects of service recovery on consumer satisfaction: a comparison between complainants and non-complainants. J Serv Mark. 2006. 20:101–111.
Article
37. Calhoun RE, Hutchinson SL. Decision-making in old age: Cautiousness and rigidity. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1981. 13:89–98.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr