Nutr Res Pract.  2009 Sep;3(3):226-233.

Using metaphorical techniques in focus groups to uncover mothers' feelings about family meals

• Kling L
• Cotugna N
• Snider S
• Peterson P

Abstract

Traditional nutrition education has not been shown to consistently produce behavior change. While it has been suggested that using emotion-based messages may be a better way to influence nutrition behavior change, this has not been well tested. Producing emotion-based messages is a multi-step process that begins with exploring subconscious barriers to behavior change rather than the more obvious and typically reported barriers. The purpose of this research was to uncover the emotional reasons, sometimes referred to as emotional pulse points, for mothers' choosing or not choosing to have more family meals. This would then serve as the first step to developing emotion-based messages promoting the benefits of family meals. Five focus group interviews were conducted with 51 low-income Black (n=28) and white (n=23) mothers. Metaphorical techniques were used to determine underlying feelings toward family and family meals. Discussions were video-taped, transcribed, and manually analyzed using a content-driven, immersion/crystallization approach to qualitative data analysis. Four themes emerged around the definition of family: acceptance, sharing, chaos, and protective/loyal. Some mothers felt mealtime was merely obligatory, and described it as stressful. Some reported a preference for attending to their own needs instead of sitting down with their children, while others felt that mealtime should be used to interact with and educate children and felt guilty when they were not able to provide family meals. Three themes emerged around feelings towards having or not having family meals: unimportant, important, and guilty. When explored further, mothers indicated that using the feeling of guilt to encourage family meals might be effective. Data obtained are being used to develop innovative, emotion-based messages that will be tested for effectiveness in promoting family meals.

Keyword

Family meals; emotional-messaging; metaphorical techniques

MeSH Terms

Child
Focus Groups
Guilt
Humans
Meals
Metaphor
Mothers
Resin Cements
Statistics as Topic
Unconscious (Psychology)
Resin Cements

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Focus Group Interview Guide

Reference

1. Anderson PM, Butcher KF. Childhood obesity: Trends and potential causes. Future Child. 2006. 16:19–45.

2. Biener L, McCallum-Keeler G, Nyman AL. Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: Impact of viewer and ad characteristics. Tobacco Control. 2000. 9:401–407.

3. Bystedt J, Lynn S, Potts D. Moderating to the Max: A Full-tilt Guide to Creative Insightful Focus Groups and In-Depth Interviews. 2003. Ithaca. NY. USA: Paramount Market Publishing Inc.;10–17.

4. Family meals. Child Trends Databank. 2003. Accessed on 3/13/2008. http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/pdf/96_PDF.pdf.

5. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. 1999. Thousand Oaks, CA. USA: Sage Publications Inc.;179–194.

6. de Pee S, Bloem MW, Satoto , Yip R, Sukaton A, Tjiong R, Shrimpton R, Muhilal , Kodyat B. Impact of a social marketing campaign promoting dark-green leafy vegetables and eggs in Central Java, Indonesia. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1998. 68:389–398.

7. Eisenberg ME, Olson RE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Bearinger LH. Correlations between family meals and psychosocial well-being among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004. 158:792–796.

8. Farrelly MC, Healton CG, Davis KC, Messeri P, Hersey JC, Haviland ML. Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. Am J Public Health. 2002. 92:901–907.

9. Gable S, Chang Y, Krull JL. Television watching and frequency of family meals are predictive of overweight onset and persistence in a national sample of school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007. 107:53–61.

10. Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Frazier L, Rockett HRH, Camargo CA, Field AE, Berkey CS, Colditz GA. Family dinner and diet quality among older children and adolescents. Arch Fam Med. 2000. 9:235–240.

11. Share family meals. Iowa State University. 2003. Accessed on 3/22/2008. http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/N3407A.pdf.

12. Johnson B, Christensen L. EducationalResearch: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. 2004. Boston. MA: Allyn and Bacon.

13. King KA, Vidourek RA, Creighton S, Vogel S. Smokers' willingness to protect children from secondhand smoke. Am J Health Behav. 2003. 27:554–563.

14. Krueger RA. Morgan DL, Krueger RA, editors. Analyzing & reporting focus group results. The Focus Group Kit. 1998. Thousand Oaks, CA. USA: Sage Publications Inc.;17–29.

15. Larson DL. Family mealtime - A tradition that isn't being skipped. 2006. Accessed on 4/13/2008. http://www.csrees.usda.gov/newsroom/lgunews/family/news002.html.

16. Lindenberger JH, Bryant CA. Promoting breastfeeding in the WIC Program: A social marketing case study. Am J Health Behav. 2000. 24:53–60.

17. Family Nutrition Program. Mississippi State University Extension Service. 2006. Accessed on 3/22/2009. Starkville, MS: http://msucares.com/health/one/fnp/index.htm.

18. Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ, Story M, Croll J, Perry C. Family meal patterns: Association with sociodemographic characteristics and improved dietary intake among adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003. 103:317–322.

19. Peterson M, Abraham A, Waterfield A. Marketing physical activity: Lessons learned from a statewide media campaign. Health Promot Pract. 2005. 6:437–446.

20. Prentice-Dunn S, Floyd DL, Flournoy JM. Effects of persuasive message order on coping with breast cancer information. Health Educ Res. 2001. 16:81–84.

21. The Importance of Family Dinners III. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. 2006. Accessed on 3/13/2009. 1–2. http://www.casacolumbia.org/absolutenm/articlefiles/380Family%20Dinners%20III%20Final%20report.pdf.

22. Verrall T, Napash L, Leclerc L, Mercure S, Gray-Donald K. Community-based communication strategies to promote infant iron nutrition in Northern Canada. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2006. 65:65–78.

23. Family meals. WIC Learning Center. 2007. Accessed on 3/22/2009. http://www.nal.usda.gov/wicworks/Learning_Center/WICfood_familymeals.html.

24. Winkleby MA, Feldman HA, Murray DM. Joint analysis of three U.S. community intervention trials for reduction of cardiovascular disease risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997. 50:645–658.

25. Wolin SJ, Bennett LA. Family rituals. Family Process. 1984. 2:401–420.

26. Zaltman G. How Customers Think; Essential Insights Into the Mind of the Market. 2003. Boston, MA. USA: Harvard Business School Press;47–50.