Lab Anim Res.  2014 Mar;30(1):1-7. 10.5625/lar.2014.30.1.1.

Proteomic analysis of pancreas in miniature pigs according to developmental stages using two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry

• Yi SS
• Kim IY
• Oh SJ
• Yeom HJ
• Yeom SC
• Hwang SY
• Seong JK

• KMID: 2312113
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5625/lar.2014.30.1.1

Abstract

Organ transplantation is limited by the shortage of human organs. Many studies have sought to overcome this hurdle by using animal organs. Porcine organs, especially from miniature pigs, have been used for organ xenotransplantation rather than nonhuman primates. While the molecular profiling for transplantation is well known in humans and rodents, the situation for pigs is almost completely unknown. The present study examined protein regulation of the developing stages of the pancreatic proteome (4 day-old miniature neonate, 19 day-old miniature piglet, and 14 month-old miniature adult pigs) using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Thirteen different expressed spots were observed and nine were identified. The data presented within this study provides critical direction relating to the development of pancreas of miniature pigs, which will assist future proteome analysis of the pancreas, and advance our understanding of the hurdles facing xenotransplantation.

Keyword

Human organ; pancreas; miniature pig; proteome; 2-DE MALDI-TOF

MeSH Terms

Adult
Animal Structures
Electrophoresis*
Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-Dimensional
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Mass Spectrometry*
Organ Transplantation
Pancreas*
Primates
Proteome
Rodentia
Swine*
Transplantation, Heterologous
Transplants
Proteome

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Representative 2-DE gels of pancreas of 4-day-old, 19-day-old and 14-month-old miniature pigs by developmental stages, visualized by Commassie blue staining. Samples of 1mg protein were separated on pH3-10 non-linear IPG strip (24cm) following by 8-18% gradient SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. Proteins were detected by Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and compared using ImageMaster™ 2D Platinum Software version 5.0. A: 2-DE gel of 4-day old miniature pig(neonate), B: 2-DE gel of 19-day old miniature pig, C: 2-DE gel of 14-month old miniature pig. The closed circles indicate 13 differentially expressed protein spots in the 4-day-old miniature neonate pig, 19-day-old miniature piglet and 14-month-old miniature adult pig.

• 

  Figure 2 Two-DE images of alterative spots of pancreas according to developmental stage. The circles indicate differentially expressed protein spots and the dot circles show down-expressed patterns. The expression patterns of the different three stages are presented as simple line graphs. Relative optical (ROD) are indicated as relative numbers under the lines compared with the lowest protein optical density (the lowest optical density is made as an '1') of each spot.

Reference

1. Cooper DK, Gollackner B, Sachs DH. Will the pig solve the transplantation backlog? Annu Rev Med. 2002; 53:133–147. PMID: 11818467.

2. Platt JL. Physiologic barriers to xenotransplantation. Transplant Proc. 2000; 32(7):1547–1548. PMID: 11119828.

3. Ryu JM, Kim DH, Lee MY, Lee SH, Park JH, Yun SP, Jang MW, Kim SH, Rho GJ, Han HJ. Imaging evaluation of the liver using multi-detector row computed tomography in micropigs as potential living liver donors. J Vet Sci. 2009; 10(2):93–98. PMID: 19461203.

4. Ibrahim Z, Busch J, Awwad M, Wagner R, Wells K, Cooper DK. Selected physiologic compatibilities and incompatibilities between human and porcine organ systems. Xenotransplantation. 2006; 13(6):488–499. PMID: 17059572.

5. Tucker A, Belcher C, Moloo B, Bell J, Mazzulli T, Humar A, Hughes A, McArdle P, Talbot A. The production of transgenic pigs for potential use in clinical xenotransplantation: baseline clinical pathology and organ size studies. Xenotransplantation. 2002; 9(3):203–208. PMID: 11983018.

6. Ando A, Ota M, Sada M, Katsuyama Y, Goto R, Shigenari A, Kawata H, Anzai T, Iwanaga T, Miyoshi Y, Fujimura N, Inoko H. Rapid assignment of the swine major histocompatibility complex (SLA) class I and II genotypes in Clawn miniature swine using PCR-SSP and PCR-RFLP methods. Xenotransplantation. 2005; 12(2):121–126. PMID: 15693842.

7. Park CG, Kim JS, Shin JS, Kim YH, Kim SJ. Current Status and Future Perspectives of xenotransplantation. J Korean Soc Transplant. 2009; 23(3):203–213.

8. Vodicka P, Smetana K Jr, Dvoránková B, Emerick T, Xu YZ, Ourednik J, Ourednik V, Motlík J. The miniature pig as an animal model in biomedical research. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005; 1049:161–171. PMID: 15965115.

9. Choi JS, Cho YK, Yoon SH, Kwon SO, Koo DB, Yu K. Proteomic analysis of porcine pancreas development. BMB Rep. 2009; 42(10):661–666. PMID: 19874711.

10. Han HJ, Kang SS, Park SH. Tissue specific expression of lipid metabolism related molecules in digestive organs of miniature pigs. Lab Anim Res. 2010; 26(3):273–278.

11. Lee MS, Song KD, Yang HJ, Solis CD, Kim SH, Lee WK. Development of a type II diabetic mellitus animal model using Micropig®. Lab Anim Res. 2012; 28(3):205–208. PMID: 23091521.

12. Cozzi E, Bosio E. Islet xenotransplantation: current status of preclinical studies in the pig-to-nonhuman primate model. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008; 13(2):155–158. PMID: 18685296.

13. Marigliano M, Bertera S, Grupillo M, Trucco M, Bottino R. Pig-to-nonhuman primates pancreatic islet xenotransplantation: an overview. Curr Diab Rep. 2011; 11(5):402–412. PMID: 21805400.

14. Rood PP, Buhler LH, Bottino R, Trucco M, Cooper DK. Pig-to-nonhuman primate islet xenotransplantation: a review of current problems. Cell Transplant. 2006; 15(2):89–104. PMID: 16719044.

15. Steiner S, Anderson NL. Pharmaceutical proteomics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000; 919:48–51. PMID: 11083096.

16. Görg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G, Harder A, Scheibe B, Wildgruber R, Weiss W. The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis. 2000; 21(6):1037–1053. PMID: 10786879.

17. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M. Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem. 1996; 68(5):850–858. PMID: 8779443.

18. Lowe ME. The triglyceride lipases of the pancreas. J Lipid Res. 2002; 43(12):2007–2016. PMID: 12454260.

19. Mahan JT, Heda GD, Rao RH, Mansbach CM 2nd. The intestine expresses pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase: regulation by dietary lipid. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001; 280(6):G1187–G1196. PMID: 11352812.

20. Hagenbüchle O, Bovey R, Young RA. Tissue-specific expression of mouse-alpha-amylase genes: nucleotide sequence of isoenzyme mRNAs from pancreas and salivary gland. Cell. 1980; 21(1):179–187. PMID: 6157477.

21. Doyon Y, Home W, Daull P, LeBel D. Effect of C-domain N-glycosylation and deletion on rat pancreatic alpha-amylase secretion and activity. Biochem J. 2002; 362(Pt 1):259–264. PMID: 11829764.

22. Miyata S, Akazawa T. Biosynthesis of rice seed alpha-amylase: proteolytic processing and glycosylation of precursor polypeptides by microsomes. J Cell Biol. 1983; 96(3):802–806. PMID: 6187753.

23. Miyata S, Akazawa T. alpha-Amylase biosynthesis: evidence for temporal sequence of NH2-terminal peptide cleavage and protein glycosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982; 79(21):6566–6568. PMID: 6183665.

24. Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004; 4(7):499–511. PMID: 15229469.

25. Creagh EM, O'Neill LA. TLRs, NLRs and RLRs: a trinity of pathogen sensors that co-operate in innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2006; 27(8):352–357. PMID: 16807108.

26. Subramaniam S, Stansberg C, Cunningham C. The interleukin 1 receptor family. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004; 28(5):415–428. PMID: 15062641.

27. Takeda K, Akira S. Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol. 2005; 17(1):1–14. PMID: 15585605.

28. Elzinga BM, Twomey C, Powell JC, Harte F, McCarthy JV. Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 is a substrate for gamma-secretase-dependent regulated intramembrane proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284(3):1394–1409. PMID: 18996842.

29. Abcouwer SF, Norman J, Fink G, Carter G, Lustig RJ, Souba WW. Tissue-specific regulation of glutamine synthetase gene expression in acute pancreatitis is confirmed by using interleukin-1 receptor knockout mice. Surgery. 1996; 120(2):255–263. PMID: 8751591.

30. Chentouf M, Dubois G, Jahannaut C, Castex F, Lajoix AD, Gross R, Peraldi-Roux S. Excessive food intake, obesity and inflammation process in Zucker fa/fa rat pancreatic islets. PLoS One. 2011; 6(8):e22954. PMID: 21826222.

31. Fink GW, Norman JG. Specific changes in the pancreatic expression of the interleukin 1 family of genes during experimental acute pancreatitis. Cytokine. 1997; 9(12):1023–1027. PMID: 9417814.

32. Subramanian A, Miller DM. Structural analysis of alpha-enolase. Mapping the functional domains involved in down-regulation of the c-myc protooncogene. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275(8):5958–5965. PMID: 10681589.

33. Wold F. Boyer PD, editor. The Enzymes. Ed. 5. Academic Press: New York, USA;1971. p. 499–508.