J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs.  2015 Jun;26(2):89-99. 10.12799/jkachn.2015.26.2.89.

The Effects of Visiting Nursing Services in Long-term Care Insurance: A Difference-in-Difference Analysis

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. lisook@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effects of visiting nursing services in long-term care (LTC) insurance on changes in health status and physical functions among the elderly.
METHODS
We analyzed survey data on the living status and welfare needs of the elderly from 2008 and 2011 using the difference-in-difference method with propensity score matching.
RESULTS
The subjects were 76 elders including 38 visiting nursing service users(intervention group) and 38 home-based LTC service users (control group). Results from DID analysis confirmed that the subjective health status level of the intervention group was 2.2 points higher (p=.044) and the depression level was 0.3 point lower (p=.039) than the control group. In addition, the intervention group's ADL score was 1.9 (p=.027) and IADL 3.9 (p=.030), showing that their health was deteriorated less.
CONCLUSION
Visiting nursing service in LTC insurance was associated with delayed deterioration of subjective health status, depression, ADL and IADL. These findings suggest the need of rebuilding visiting nursing service programs focusing on prevention services, which will be more contributive to elderly health care and the reduction of social costs.

Keyword

Insurance; Long term care; Health status; Physical conditioning; Human; Propensity scores

MeSH Terms

Activities of Daily Living
Aged
Delivery of Health Care
Depression
Humans
Insurance
Insurance, Long-Term Care*
Long-Term Care
Nursing Services*
Propensity Score

Figure

  • Figure 1 Research frameworks based on Andersen's behavioral model of service use.


Cited by  2 articles

Demand and willing to pay for oral hygiene service in long-term care insurance of elderly
Han-Nah Kim, Gi-Yon Kim, Hie-Jin Noh, Nam-Hee Kim
J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2018;42(4):204-209.    doi: 10.11149/jkaoh.2018.42.4.204.

Regional Comparison of Home Visiting Care Service Satisfaction among Elder Beneficiaries of the Long Term Care Insurance
Chanyeong Kwak
J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2016;27(2):114-123.    doi: 10.12799/jkachn.2016.27.2.114.


Reference

1. Statistics Korea. 2013 elderly statistics [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2013. cited 2014 December 22. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/wnsearch/search.jsp.
2. Sun WD, Kim CW, Im HY, Kim SO, Seo DM, Yang YA, et al. Latest elderly long-term care insurance. Seoul: Elderly Information Center of Korea;2012. p. 290.
3. Park MH, Ha JC, Sihn IH, Kim HG, Lee SY, Cho JH, et al. 2008 the living status and welfare needs survey based analysis report. Analysis Report. Seoul: Ministry for Health Welfare and Family Affairs;2009. 02. Report No.: 11-1351000000316-12.
4. Long-term Care Insurance Corporation. Introduction of policy [Internet]. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation;2013. cited 2014 December 22. Available from: http://longtermcare.or.kr/portal/site/nydev/MENUITEM_LTCARE/.
5. Boyd CM, Reider L, Frey K, Scharfstein D, Leff B, Wolff J, et al. The effects of guided care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; 25(3):235–242. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1192-5.
Article
6. Lee YK. Evaluation of the elderly long-term care insurance: User's perspective. Health Welf Policy Forum. 2010; 168:25–33.
7. Hyun KR, Kwon JH, Han EJ. A study on factors and improvement related to physical function change of LTC applicants. Analysis Report. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation;2010. 12. 17. Report No.: 2010-20.
8. Hyun KR, Lee SM. Effects on the functional status changes of LTC (long-term care) services. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2012; 32(2):593–609.
9. Kwon HJ, Cho YW, Ko JY. The effects of long-term care insurance on the life satisfaction and satisfaction in family relationships - The DD method combined with propensity score matching. Korean J Soc Welf. 2011; 63(4):301–326.
10. Park CJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of long term care services: Care in institutions vs in-home care. J Welf Aged. 2010; 50:145–171.
11. Lee KE. Health outcomes for older adults with stroke in nursing home and home care [master's thesis]. [Seoul]: Yonsei University;2013. 54.
12. Lee JS, Han EJ, Kang IO. The characteristics and service utilization of home nursing care beneficiaries under the Korean long term care insurance. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2011; 22(1):33–44.
Article
13. Lee AJ, Park YH, Hong MS, Lee PS, Choi KS, Kim CS. Performed the first anniversary of long-term care insurance visiting nursing service policy debate for the activation. Trend Analysis Report. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation;2009. 09. 17. Report No.: 1000028627.
14. Jung YS. A study on home visiting nursing care and medical care utilization in the elderly patients with long-term care [dissertation]. [Gimhae]: Inje University;2012. 103.
15. Kang SB, Kim HS. The relationship between home-visit nursing services and health care utilization among nursing service recommended beneficiaries of the public long-term care insurance. Health Policy Manag. 2014; 24(3):283–290. DOI: 10.4332/kjhpa.2014.24.3.283.
Article
16. Kim MH. Development of home visiting nursing standards based on a long-term care insurance for the elderly program. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2010; 24(2):285–301.
17. Moon KJ. Current status and problems of home visit nursing service within long term care insurance [master's thesis]. [Seoul]: Sungshin Women's University;2011. 71.
18. Sumg MS, Jang HJ, Kim CG, Kang KH, Nam KA, Park JD. Comparative study of home nursing care services under the long-term care insurance system in four nations. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2010; 24(2):211–225.
19. Kim MH. Roles of visiting nurses defined based on long-term care insurance regulation for the elderly. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2009; 23(2):232–250.
20. Kim KH. Health needs of visiting health subjects evaluated by using RAI-MDS-HC 2.0. J Korean Soc Living Environ Syst. 2008; 15(1):102–111.
21. Andersen RM. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995; 36(1):1–10. DOI: 10.2307/2137284.
Article
22. Elkan R, Kendrick D. What is the effectiveness of home visiting or home-based support for older people? Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe's Health Evidence Network (HEN);2004. 06. 19.
23. Patorno E, Grotta A, Bellocco R, Schneeweiss S. Propensity score methodology for confounding control in health care utilization databases. Epidemiol Biostat Public Health. 2013; 10(3):8941–8916. DOI: 10.2427/8940.
24. Lee TH, Ko YK, Kim BN, Kim HC, Kee IS, Jung SH, et al. Performance evaluation about operation the LTC insurance system: 3rd. clinical effects of LTC insurance and development of clinical indicator. Seoul: Ministry for Health Welfare and Family Affairs;2011. p. 181.
25. Lee MJ. A study on measurement issues of the quality of longterm care services for older adults. Soc Welf Policy. 2011; 38(1):141–165.
26. Huber M, Hennessy P. Long-term care for older people. Paris: OECD Publishing;2005. p. 138.
27. Lee JS, Han EJ, Kwon JH, Kang IO. Correlation analysis between standard LTC utilization plan and expenditures for long term care. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation;2008. p. 188.
28. Park JY, Lee YH, Kwon JH, Lee EM, Lee HY, Kim YH. Development of Integrated care model for LTC and medical service. Development Report. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation;2010. 10. Report No.: 2010-18.
Full Text Links
  • JKACHN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr