Transl Clin Pharmacol.  2016 Jun;24(2):105-110. 10.12793/tcp.2016.24.2.105.

Population pharmacokinetics and inter-laboratory variability of sildenafil and its metabolite after oral administration in Korean healthy male volunteers

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, PIPET (Pharmacometrics Institute for Practical Education and Training), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea. waystolove@cath

Abstract

This study was to clarify population pharmacokinetics (PK) of sildenafil and its metabolite, N-desmethyl sildenafil (NDS) in Korean healthy male population using a pooled data from multiple clinical trials in consideration of inter-institution and inter-laboratory difference. A population PK analysis was performed with data of 243 healthy volunteers from five single-center (4 centers) comparative PK trials. The dataset included 7,376 sildenafil and NDS concentration (3,688 for each analyte) observed during 24 hours after the single dose of original sildenafil (either 50 mg or 100 mg of Viagra®). The plasma concentration was assayed in two laboratories. Various model structure was tested and the final model was evaluated using visual predictive checks. Demographic and clinical variables were assessed as potential covariates for PK parameters. A one-compartment first-order elimination model with proportional error was selected for the dispositional characteristics of sildenafil, and two-compartment model was chosen for NDS. Three transit compartments with Erlang-type absorption for fast absorption pathway and one compartment for slow absorption pathway constructed overall absorption model. The first-pass effect was rejected since it does not improve the model. The difference of NDS level by the bioanalysis laboratory was selected as the only covariate. Even though a direct comparison was difficult, the general trend in PK of sildenafil and NDS for Korean healthy male was considered similar to that of the other populations reported previously. It is recommended that the laboratory effect should be explored and evaluated when dataset is built using results from several laboratories.

Keyword

Sildenafil; Population pharmacokinetics; Koreans; Mixed-effects model (MEM); NONMEM

MeSH Terms

Absorption
Administration, Oral*
Asian Continental Ancestry Group
Dataset
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Male*
Pharmacokinetics*
Plasma
Sildenafil Citrate*
Volunteers*
Sildenafil Citrate

Figure

  • Figure 1. Outline of the final model.

  • Figure 2. Visual predictive check. Solid line: prediction median, Colored band: 90% prediction interval.


Reference

References

1. Braun M, Wassmer G, Klotz T, Reifenrath B, Mathers M, Engelmann U. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the “Cologne Male Survey”. Int J Impot Res. 2000; 12:305–311. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900622.
Article
2. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999; 281:537–545. doi: 10.1001/jama. 281.6.537.
3. Lewis RW, Fugl-Meyer KS, Bosch R, Fugl-Meyer AR, Laumann EO, Lizza E, et al. Epidemiology/risk factors of sexual dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2004; 1:35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2004.10106.x.
Article
4. Burnett AL. Erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2006; 175::. 25S–31S. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347 (05)00309-5.
Article
5. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:1397–1404. doi: 10.1056/NEJM1998051 43382001.
6. Dean RC, Lue TF. Physiology of penile erection and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am. 2005; 32:379–395. doi: 10.1016/j. ucl.2005.08.007.
Article
7. Melman A, Gingell JC. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 1999; 161:5–11. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347 (01)62045-7.
Article
8. Salonia A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Sildenafil in erectile dysfunction: a critical review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2003; 19:241–262. doi: 10.1185/030079903125 001839.
Article
9. Montague DK, Barada JH, Belker AM, Levine LA, Nadig PW, Roehrborn CG, et al. Clinical guidelines panel on erectile dysfunction: summary report on the treatment of organic erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 1996; 156:2007–2011.
Article
10. Ignarro LJ, Napoli C, Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide donors and cardiovascular agents modulating the bioactivity of nitric oxide: an overview. Circ Res. 2002; 90:21–28. doi: 10.1161/hh0102.102330.
11. Muirhead GJ, Rance DJ, Walker DK, Wastall P. Comparative human pharmacokinetics and metabolism of single-dose oral and intravenous sildenafil. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 53::. 13S–20S. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001. 00028.x.
Article
12. Nichols DJ, Muirhead GJ, Harness JA. Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil after single oral doses in healthy male subjects: absolute bioavailability, food effects and dose proportionality. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 53::. 5S–12S. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.00027.x.
Article
13. Benmebarek M, Devaud C, Gex-Fabry M, Powell Golay K, Brogli C, Baumann P, et al. Effects of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of methadone. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004; 76:55–63. doi: 10. 1016/j.clpt.2004.03.007.
14. Wilner K, Laboy L, LeBel M. The effects of cimetidine and antacid on the pharmacokinetic profile of sildenafil citrate in healthy male volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 53::. 31S–36S. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.000 30.x.
Article
15. Al-Ghazawi MA, Tutunji MS, Aburuz SM. The effects of pummelo juice on pharmacokinetics of sildenafil in healthy adult male Jordanian volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 66:159–163. doi: 10.1007/s00228-009-0738-0.
Article
16. Pfizer. VIAGRA (sildenafil citrate) label. 2015.http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020895s045lbl.pdf/AccessedMay24. 2016.
17. Walker DK, Ackland MJ, James GC, Muirhead GJ, Rance DJ, Wastall P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sildenafil in mouse, rat, rabbit, dog and man. Xenobiotica. 1999; 29:297–310.
Article
18. Liew KB, Tan YT, Peh KK. Effect of polymer, plasticizer and filler on orally disintegrating film. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014; 40:110–119. doi: 10.3109/03639045.2012.749889.
Article
19. Al-Ghazawi M, Tutunji M, AbuRuz S. Simultaneous determination of sildenafil and N-desmethyl sildenafil in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography method using electrochemical detection with application to a pharmacokinetic study. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007; 43:613–618. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.07.028.
Article
20. Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification Limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001; 28:481–504.
21. Hyland R, Roe EG, Jones BC, Smith DA. Identification of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the N-demethylation of sildenafil. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 51:239–248. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00318.x.
22. Gupta M, Kovar A, Meibohm B. The clinical pharmacokinetics of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005; 45:987–1003. doi: 10.1177/0091270005276847.
Article
23. Milligan PA, Marshall SF, Karlsson MO. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of sildenafil citrate in patients with erectile dysfunction. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002; 53::. 45S–52S. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.00032.x.
Article
Full Text Links
  • TCP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr