J Clin Neurol.  2012 Dec;8(4):251-258. 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.4.251.

Impact of CHADS2 Score on Neurological Severity and Long-Term Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation-Related Ischemic Stroke

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sb0516@snu.ac.kr, bwyoon@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Clinical Research Center for Stroke, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The CHADS2 (an acronym for congestive heart failure, hypertension, age > or =75 years, diabetes mellitus, and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism) score is a widely used system for estimating the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, how the CHADS2 score is related to stroke severity and outcome in patients with strokes due to atrial fibrillation has not yet been elucidated.
METHODS
We enrolled patients with atrial fibrillation who visited our stroke center within 7 days after the onset of acute ischemic stroke between October 2002 and September 2008. CHADS2 scores were categorized into three groups: 0 points, low risk; 1 or 2 points, intermediate risk; and 3-6 points, high risk. Poor neurological state was defined as follows: a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of > or =2, and a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of > or =3 at discharge. Mortality information was ascertained as at December 2008.
RESULTS
A cohort of 298 patients with atrial-fibrillation-related stroke was included in this study. A high-risk CHADS2 score at admission was a powerful predictor of poor neurological outcome [for NIHSS: odds ratio (OR), 4.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76-9.87; for mRS: OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.23-7.16] after controlling for all possible confounders. In addition, a high-risk CHADS2 score was an independent predictor of all causes of death during the follow-up [hazard ratio (HR), 3.01; 95% CI, 1.18-7.65] and vascular death (HR, 12.25; 95% CI, 1.50-99.90).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the CHADS2 score was originally designed to distinguish patients with a future risk of stroke, our study shows that it may also be used to predict poor neurological outcome after atrial-fibrillation-related stroke.

Keyword

atrial fibrillation; ischemic stroke; CHADS2 score; neurological severity; outcome

MeSH Terms

Atrial Fibrillation
Cause of Death
Cohort Studies
Diabetes Mellitus
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Failure
Humans
Hypertension
Ischemic Attack, Transient
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Odds Ratio
Stroke

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier curves of all-cause (A), vascular (B), and nonvascular (C) deaths.


Cited by  1 articles

Spontaneous Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Normal Sinus Rhythm Following Recurrent Cerebral Infarctions
Kyungmi Oh, Jeong-Yoon Choi, Byung-Jo Kim
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2013;53(6):368-370.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2013.53.6.368.


Reference

1. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. 23:961–969.
Article
2. Flegel KM, Shipley MJ, Rose G. Risk of stroke in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. Lancet. 1987. 1:526–529.
Article
3. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation: a major contributor to stroke in the elderly. The Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 1987. 147:1561–1564.
Article
4. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991. 22:983–988.
Article
5. Risk factors for stroke and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Analysis of pooled data from five randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994. 154:1449–1457.
6. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB, Mathewson FA, Cuddy TE. The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up Study. Am J Med. 1995. 98:476–484.
Article
7. Lévy S, Maarek M, Coumel P, Guize L, Lekieffre J, Medvedowsky JL, et al. The College of French Cardiologists. Characterization of different subsets of atrial fibrillation in general practice in France: the ALFA study. Circulation. 1999. 99:3028–3035.
Article
8. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007. 146:857–867.
Article
9. Stroke Risk in Atrial Fibrillation Working Group. Independent predictors of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Neurology. 2007. 69:546–554.
10. Mackman N. Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis. Nature. 2008. 451:914–918.
Article
11. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009. 361:1139–1151.
Article
12. Krynetskiy E, McDonnell P. Building individualized medicine: prevention of adverse reactions to warfarin therapy. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007. 322:427–434.
Article
13. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, Poggi M, Manotti C, D'Angelo A, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet. 1996. 348:423–428.
Article
14. Feng D, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Lipinska I, Massaro J, Levy D, et al. Hemostatic state and atrial fibrillation (the Framingham Offspring Study). Am J Cardiol. 2001. 87:168–171.
Article
15. Kopecky SL, Gersh BJ, McGoon MD, Whisnant JP, Holmes DR Jr, Ilstrup DM, et al. The natural history of lone atrial fibrillation. A population-based study over three decades. N Engl J Med. 1987. 317:669–674.
16. Gage BF, Waterman AD, Shannon W, Boechler M, Rich MW, Radford MJ. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. JAMA. 2001. 285:2864–2870.
Article
17. Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L, Hart RG, Koudstaal PJ, Boode BS, et al. Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin. Circulation. 2004. 110:2287–2292.
Article
18. Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, Borowsky L, Pomernacki NK, Singer DE, et al. Comparison of risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008. 51:810–815.
Article
19. Lee SH, Kim BJ, Ryu WS, Kim CK, Kim N, Park BJ, et al. White matter lesions and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage: a nationwide cohort study. Neurology. 2010. 74:1502–1510.
Article
20. Ryu WS, Lee SH, Kim CK, Kim BJ, Yoon BW. Effects of low serum triglyceride on stroke mortality: a prospective follow-up study. Atherosclerosis. 2010. 212:299–304.
Article
21. Kim BJ, Lee SH, Ryu WS, Kim CK, Lee J, Yoon BW. Paradoxical longevity in obese patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology. 2011. 76:567–573.
Article
22. Manual of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death. 1992. 10th revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
23. Young FB, Weir CJ, Lees KR. GAIN International Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Comparison of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale with disability outcome measures in acute stroke trials. Stroke. 2005. 36:2187–2192.
Article
24. Weisscher N, Vermeulen M, Roos YB, de Haan RJ. What should be defined as good outcome in stroke trials; a modified Rankin score of 0-1 or 0-2? J Neurol. 2008. 255:867–874.
Article
25. Barreto AD, Albright KC, Hallevi H, Grotta JC, Noser EA, Khaja AM, et al. Thrombus burden is associated with clinical outcome after intra-arterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2008. 39:3231–3235.
Article
26. Puetz V, Dzialowski I, Hill MD, Subramaniam S, Sylaja PN, Krol A, et al. Intracranial thrombus extent predicts clinical outcome, final infarct size and hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke: the clot burden score. Int J Stroke. 2008. 3:230–236.
Article
27. Lip GY, Blann AD. Does hypertension confer a prothrombotic state? Virchow's triad revisited. Circulation. 2000. 101:218–220.
28. Tofler GH, Massaro J, Levy D, Mittleman M, Sutherland P, Lipinska I, et al. Relation of the prothrombotic state to increasing age (from the Framingham Offspring Study). Am J Cardiol. 2005. 96:1280–1283.
Article
29. Grant PJ. Diabetes mellitus as a prothrombotic condition. J Intern Med. 2007. 262:157–172.
Article
30. Gustafsson C, Blombäck M, Britton M, Hamsten A, Svensson J. Coagulation factors and the increased risk of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 1990. 21:47–51.
Article
31. Lip GY, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Dunn FG. Fibrinogen and fibrin D-dimer levels in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: evidence for intermediate elevated levels of intravascular thrombogenesis. Am Heart J. 1996. 131:724–730.
Article
32. Blann AD, Waite MA. von Willebrand factor and soluble E-selectin in hypertension: influence of treatment and value in predicting the progression of atherosclerosis. Coron Artery Dis. 1996. 7:143–147.
33. Blinzler C, Breuer L, Huttner HB, Schellinger PD, Schwab S, Köhrmann M. Characteristics and outcome of patients with early complete neurological recovery after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011. 31:185–190.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JCN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr