Korean J Prev Med.
2000 Dec;33(4):449-458.
Size of Prostatitis Symptoms Using Prostatitis Symptom Index(PSI):
The Effect of Prostatitis Symptoms on Quality of Life
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
- 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
- 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence of prostatitis symptoms in the general
population by questionnaire survey and to measure the effect of prostatitis symptoms on
quality of life(QOL).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A cross sectional community-based epidemiologic study was
performed on 2,034 men, living in the Seoul metropolitan area using stepwise random
sampling. Out of 2,034 interviewees, 1,356 men who were older than 40 and provided
sufficient information were selected for this study. The questionnaires were completed
by well trained interviewers. Contents of the questionnaires included demographic data,
the Prostatitis Symptom Index(PSI), the International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), a
general health questionnaire section and a sexual health questionnaire section. The PSI
was composed of a sum of the scores from three questions about dysuria, penile pain
and perineal pain and it ranged 0 to 12. Incidence of prostatitis symptoms was defined
by a score of 4 or more and the reference group was defined as consisting of those
with a score of 3 or less. The rate of incidence of prostatitis symptoms was assessed
according to age and the difference of QOL between the prostatitis symptoms group and
the reference group.
RESULTS
The overall positive rate of prostatitis symptoms measured by the PSI, in men
older than 40, living in the Seoul metropolitan area, was 4.5%(61/1,356), adjusted to 4.8%
by the relative proportion of this age group in the general population of the Seoul
metropolitan area as compared to Korea and the World. The proportion of the group
with prostatitis symptoms assessed by the PSI did not increase with age although the
proportion of participants with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
did increase with age. The group with prostatitis symptoms suffered from a much
greater incidence of LUTS compared to the reference group (p<0.05). The QOL scores
of the IPSS, and the general health and sexual health status of the group with
prostatitis symptoms, were worse than those of the reference group.(p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The positive rate of prostatitis symptoms in men older than 40, living in
the Seoul metropolitan area, was 4.8% and it didn't increase with age. The general
QOL of the group with prostatitis symptoms was much worse than that of the reference
group.