Diabetes Metab J.  2012 Apr;36(2):120-127. 10.4093/dmj.2012.36.2.120.

Perception of Clinicians and Diabetic Patients on the Importance of Postprandial Glucose Control and Diabetes Education Status: A Cross Sectional Survey

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sungwoo0913.park@samsung.com
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 7Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 8Department of Internal Medicine, WCU Program, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Recent studies have shown the importance of postprandial glucose (PPG) in the development of diabetes complications. This study was conducted in order to survey the perceptions of clinicians and diabetic patients with respect to PPG management and the current status of diabetes education.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study involving face-to-face interviews and an open questionnaire survey conducted in Korea. A total of 300 patients and 130 clinicians completed questionnaires, which included current education status, self monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), criteria of diagnosis and management, and perceptions relating to PPG management.
RESULTS
While there was a significantly higher perceived need for diabetes education, the sufficiency of the current education was considered to be severely lacking. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), PPG, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were all important considerations for clinicians when making a diagnosis of diabetes, although PPG was considered less important than FPG or HbA1c in the treatment of diabetes. Most clinicians and patients were aware of the importance of PPG, but actual education on the importance of PPG was not actively being delivered.
CONCLUSION
Our study showed that the current status of diabetes education is insufficient to meet the needs of the Korean population. A considerable gap was found to exist between awareness and what was actually taught in the current education program in regard to the importance of PPG. These results suggest that clinicians need to be more active in patient education, especially in regard to the importance of PPG.

Keyword

Diabetes education; Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Perception; Postprandial glucose

MeSH Terms

Blood Glucose
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes Complications
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Fasting
Glucose
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated
Humans
Korea
Patient Education as Topic
Plasma
Surveys and Questionnaires
Blood Glucose
Glucose
Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Usage pattern of check-up test. (A) Test used for diagnosis according to clinicians and patients. (B) Test used for treatment according to clinicians in order of priority. FPG, fasting plasma glucose; PPG, postprandial glucose; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.


Reference

1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2010. Diabetes Care. 2010. 33:Suppl 1. S11–S61.
2. Boutati EI, Raptis SA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose as part of the integral care of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009. 32:Suppl 2. S205–S210.
3. Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, Heine RJ, Holman RR, Sherwin R, Zinman B. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006. 29:1963–1972.
4. Shiraiwa T, Kaneto H, Miyatsuka T, Kato K, Yamamoto K, Kawashima A, Kanda T, Suzuki M, Imano E, Matsuhisa M, Hori M, Yamasaki Y. Post-prandial hyperglycemia is an important predictor of the incidence of diabetic microangiopathy in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005. 336:339–345.
5. Hanefeld M, Cagatay M, Petrowitsch T, Neuser D, Petzinna D, Rupp M. Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies. Eur Heart J. 2004. 25:10–16.
6. Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Schaper F, Fuecker K, Henkel E, Temelkova-Kurktschiev T. Postprandial plasma glucose is an independent risk factor for increased carotid intima-media thickness in non-diabetic individuals. Atherosclerosis. 1999. 144:229–235.
7. Jackson CA, Yudkin JS, Forrest RD. A comparison of the relationships of the glucose tolerance test and the glycated haemoglobin assay with diabetic vascular disease in the community. The Islington Diabetes Survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1992. 17:111–123.
8. DECODE Study Group, on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Glucose tolerance and cardiovascular mortality: comparison of fasting and 2-hour diagnostic criteria. Arch Intern Med. 2001. 161:397–405.
9. Donahue RP, Abbott RD, Reed DM, Yano K. Postchallenge glucose concentration and coronary heart disease in men of Japanese ancestry. Honolulu Heart Program. Diabetes. 1987. 36:689–692.
10. Nakagami T. DECODA Study Group. Hyperglycaemia and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in five populations of Asian origin. Diabetologia. 2004. 47:385–394.
11. Nam HW. Training program for diabetes educator. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 1998. 22:S49–S53.
12. Balcou-Debussche M, Debussche X. Type 2 diabetes patient education in Reunion Island: perceptions and needs of professionals in advance of the initiation of a primary care management network. Diabetes Metab. 2008. 34(4 Pt 1):375–381.
13. Do DV, Nguyen QD, Bressler NM, Schachat AP, Solomon SD, Melia M, Bressler SB. Hemoglobin A1c awareness among patients receiving eye care at a tertiary ophthalmic center. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006. 141:951–953.
14. Harwell TS, Dettori N, McDowall JM, Quesenberry K, Priest L, Butcher MK, Flook BN, Helgerson SD, Gohdes D. Do persons with diabetes know their (A1C) number? Diabetes Educ. 2002. 28:99–105.
15. Heisler M, Piette JD, Spencer M, Kieffer E, Vijan S. The relationship between knowledge of recent HbA1c values and diabetes care understanding and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005. 28:816–822.
16. Iqbal N, Morgan C, Maksoud H, Idris I. Improving patients' knowledge on the relationship between HbA1c and mean plasma glucose improves glycaemic control among persons with poorly controlled diabetes. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008. 45(Pt 5):504–507.
17. Davidson J. Should postprandial glucose be measured and treated to a particular target? Yes. Diabetes Care. 2003. 26:1919–1921.
18. Monnier L, Lapinski H, Colette C. Contributions of fasting and postprandial plasma glucose increments to the overall diurnal hyperglycemia of type 2 diabetic patients: variations with increasing levels of HbA(1c). Diabetes Care. 2003. 26:881–885.
19. Bastyr EJ 3rd, Stuart CA, Brodows RG, Schwartz S, Graf CJ, Zagar A, Robertson KE. IOEZ Study Group. Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. Diabetes Care. 2000. 23:1236–1241.
20. Gallwitz B. Implications of postprandial glucose and weight control in people with type 2 diabetes: understanding and implementing the International Diabetes Federation guidelines. Diabetes Care. 2009. 32:Suppl 2. S322–S325.
Full Text Links
  • DMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr