Korean J Pain.  2012 Oct;25(4):228-237. 10.3344/kjp.2012.25.4.228.

Evaluation of the Neurological Safety of Epidural Milnacipran in Rats

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. pain@cau.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Prosthodontics, Dentistry, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Graduated School of Clinical Dentistry, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 5Department of Pathology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Milnacipran is a balanced serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with minimal side effects and broad safety margin. It acts primarily on the descending inhibitory pain pathway in brain and spinal cord. In many animal studies, intrathecal administration of milnacipran is effective in neuropathic pain management. However, there is no study for the neurological safety of milnacipran when it is administered neuraxially. This study examined the neurotoxicity of epidural milnacipran by observing behavioral and sensory-motor changes with histopathological examinations of spinal cords in rats.
METHODS
Sixty rats were divided into 3 groups, with each group receiving epidural administration of either 0.3 ml (3 mg) of milnacipran (group M, n = 20), 0.3 ml of 40% alcohol (group A, n = 20), or 0.3 ml of normal saline (group S, n = 20).
RESULTS
There were no abnormal changes in the behavioral, sensory-motor, or histopathological findings in all rats of groups M and S over a 3-week observation period, whereas all rats in group A had abnormal changes.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on these findings, the direct epidural administration of milnacipran in rats did not present any evidence of neurotoxicity in behavioral, sensory-motor and histopathological evaluations.

Keyword

epidural injection; milnacipran; neurotoxicity

MeSH Terms

Animals
Brain
Cyclopropanes
Injections, Epidural
Neuralgia
Norepinephrine
Rats
Serotonin
Spinal Cord
Cyclopropanes
Norepinephrine
Serotonin

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Characteristic light microscopic appearances of vacuolation in the dorsal funiculus stained with hematoxylin and eosin from groups S (A, B), M (C, D) and A (E, F). Groups S and M show no vacuolation but, group A show severe (grade III) vacuolation in dorsal funiculus (indicated with red arrow). A, C, E: original magnification ×40. B, D, F: original magnification ×400.

  • Fig. 2 Characteristic light microscopic findings of chromatolysis of the motor neuron in the ventral horn stained with hematoxylin and eosin from groups S (A, B), M (C, D) and A (E, F). In groups S and M, the motor neurons in the ventral horn show normal morphology. However, in group A, motor neuron shows a chromatolytic appearance (indicated with red arrow). A, C, E: original magnification ×40. B, D, F: original magnification ×400.

  • Fig. 3 Characteristic light microscopic findings of neuritis stained with hematoxylin and eosin from groups S (A, B), M (C, D) and A (E, F). In groups S and M, any infiltration of the inflammatory cells is not seen. The spinal nerves show normal morphology. However, in group A, there is a heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils (indicated with red arrow). A, C, E: original magnification ×40. B, D, F: original magnification ×400.

  • Fig. 4 Characteristic light microscopic findings of meningeal inflammation stained with hematoxylin and eosin from groups S (A, B), M (C, D) and A (E, F). In groups S and M, the meninges are thin and show no infiltration of inflammatory cells. However, in group A, the meninges are thickened and show heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils (indicated with red arrow). A, C, E: original magnification ×40. B, D, F: original magnification ×400.


Reference

1. Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Efficacy of pharmacological treatments of neuropathic pain: an update and effect related to mechanism of drug action. Pain. 1999; 83:389–400. PMID: 10568846.
Article
2. Walsh TD. Antidepressants in chronic pain. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1983; 6:271–295. PMID: 6141005.
Article
3. Obata H, Saito S, Koizuka S, Nishikawa K, Goto F. The monoamine-mediated antiallodynic effects of intrathecally administered milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg. 2005; 100:1406–1410. PMID: 15845695.
Article
4. Fanton L, Bévalot F, Grait H, Le Meur C, Gaillard Y, Malicier D. Fatal intoxication with milnacipran. J Forensic Leg Med. 2008; 15:388–390. PMID: 18586210.
Article
5. Ikeda T, Ishida Y, Naono R, Takeda R, Abe H, Nakamura T, et al. Effects of intrathecal administration of newer antidepressants on mechanical allodynia in rat models of neuropathic pain. Neurosci Res. 2009; 63:42–46. PMID: 18992286.
Article
6. Mochizucki D. Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors in animal models of pain. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004; 19(Suppl 1):S15–S19. PMID: 15378668.
Article
7. Shin SW, Eisenach JC. Peripheral nerve injury sensitizes the response to visceral distension but not its inhibition by the antidepressant milnacipran. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100:671–675. PMID: 15108984.
Article
8. Park SC, Shin SW, Baek SH, Kim HK, Baik SW, Kim KH. The effects of milnacipran on rat pain model. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2004; 47:260–265.
Article
9. Fairbanks CA. Spinal delivery of analgesics in experimental models of pain and analgesia. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003; 55:1007–1041. PMID: 12935942.
Article
10. Yaksh TL, Collins JG. Studies in animals should precede human use of spinally administered drugs. Anesthesiology. 1989; 70:4–6. PMID: 2912314.
Article
11. Schug SA, Saunders D, Kurowski I, Paech MJ. Neuraxial drug administration: a review of treatment options for anaesthesia and analgesia. CNS Drugs. 2006; 20:917–933. PMID: 17044729.
12. Kim YC, Lim YJ, Lee SC. Spreading pattern of epidurally administered contrast medium in rabbits. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998; 42:1092–1095. PMID: 9809094.
Article
13. Lim YJ, Sim WS, Kim YC, Lee SC, Choi YL. The neurotoxicity of epidural hyaluronic acid in rabbits: a light and electron microscopic examination. Anesth Analg. 2003; 97:1716–1720. PMID: 14633548.
Article
14. Choi SS, Kim YC, Lim YJ, Lee CJ, Lee PB, Lee SC, et al. The neurological safety of epidural gabapentin in rats: a light microscopic examination. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101:1422–1426. PMID: 16244005.
Article
15. Hayashi N, Weinstein JN, Meller ST, Lee HM, Spratt KF, Gebhart GF. The effect of epidural injection of betamethasone or bupivacaine in a rat model of lumbar radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23:877–885. PMID: 9580954.
Article
16. Kawakami M, Matsumoto T, Hashizume H, Kuribayashi K, Tamaki T. Epidural injection of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor attenuates pain-related behavior following application of nucleus pulposus to the nerve root in the rat. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20:376–381. PMID: 11918320.
Article
17. Lee JR. Evaluation of the neurological safety of epidural pregabalin in rats (dissertation). 2008. Seoul: Seoul National Univ..
18. Bajrović F, Sketelj J. Extent of nociceptive dermatomes in adult rats is not primarily maintained by axonal competition. Exp Neurol. 1998; 150:115–121. PMID: 9514823.
Article
19. Thalhammer JG, Vladimirova M, Bershadsky B, Strichartz GR. Neurologic evaluation of the rat during sciatic nerve block with lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 1995; 82:1013–1025. PMID: 7717536.
Article
20. Kawakami M, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Chatani K, Traub RJ, Meller ST, et al. Experimental lumbar radiculopathy. Immunohistochemical and quantitative demonstrations of pain induced by lumbar nerve root irritation of the rat. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19:1780–1794. PMID: 7526474.
Article
21. Guevara-López U, Covarrubias-Gómez A, Gutierrez-Acar H, Aldrete JA, López-Muñoz FJ, Martínez-Benítez B. Chronic subarachnoid administration of 1-(4chlorobenzoyl)-5methoxy-2methyl-1H-indole-3 acetic acid (indomethacin): an evaluation of its neurotoxic effects in an animal model. Anesth Analg. 2006; 103:99–102. PMID: 16790634.
Article
22. Madsen JB, Jensen FM, Faber T, Bille-Hansen V. Chronic catheterization of the epidural space in rabbits: a model for behavioural and histopathological studies. Examination of meptazinol neurotoxicity. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993; 37:307–313. PMID: 8517109.
Article
23. Gurun MS, Leinbach R, Moore L, Lee CS, Owen MD, Eisenach JC. Studies on the safety of glucose and paraben-containing neostigmine for intrathecal administration. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85:317–323. PMID: 9249107.
Article
24. Hodgson PS, Neal JM, Pollock JE, Liu SS. The neurotoxicity of drugs given intrathecally (spinal). Anesth Analg. 1999; 88:797–809. PMID: 10195528.
Article
25. Fazakas J, Tóth S, Füle B, Smudla A, Mándli T, Radnai M, et al. Epidural anesthesia? No of course. Transplant Proc. 2008; 40:1216–1217. PMID: 18555151.
Article
26. Governale LS, Fein N, Logsdon J, Black PM. Techniques and complications of external lumbar drainage for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63:379–384. PMID: 18981847.
Article
27. Hassenbusch SJ, Portenoy RK, Cousins M, Buchser E, Deer TR, Du Pen SL, et al. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003: an update on the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery-- report of an expert panel. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004; 27:540–563. PMID: 15165652.
Article
28. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008; 22:659–661. PMID: 17942826.
Article
29. Rocco AG, Chan V, Iacobo C. An algorithm for the treatment of pain in advanced cancer. Hosp J. 1989; 5:93–103. PMID: 2628254.
Article
30. Hogan QH, Stadnicka A, Stekiel TA, Bosnjak ZJ, Kampine JP. Mechanism of mesenteric venodilatation after epidural lidocaine in rabbits. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81:939–945. PMID: 7943844.
Article
31. Svensson BA, Alari L, Post C. Repeated intrathecal injections of dezocine produce antinociception without evidence for neurotoxicity in the rat: a study of morphometric evaluation of spinal cord histology. Anesth Analg. 1992; 75:392–399. PMID: 1510261.
32. Norton S. Is behavior or morphology a more sensitive indicator of central nervous system toxicity? Environ Health Perspect. 1978; 26:21–27. PMID: 363417.
Article
33. Singler RC. Alcohol neurolysis of sciatic and femoral nerves. Anesth Analg. 1981; 60:532–533. PMID: 7195671.
Article
34. Porges P, Zdrahal F. Intrathecal alcohol neurolysis of the lower sacral roots in inoperable rectal cancer. Anaesthesist. 1985; 34:627–629. PMID: 2418708.
35. Pélissier J, Viel E, Enjalbert M, Kotzki N, Eledjam JJ. Chemical neurolysis using alcohol (alcoholization) in the treatment of spasticity in the hemiplegic. Cah Anesthesiol. 1993; 41:139–143. PMID: 8504349.
36. Gallager HS, Yonezawa T, Hay RC, Derrick WS. Subarachnoid alcohol block. II. Histologic changes in the central nervous system. Am J Pathol. 1961; 38:679–693. PMID: 13703113.
37. Matsuki M, Kato Y, Ichiyanagi K. Progressive changes in the concentration of ethyl alcohol in the human and canine subrachnoid spaces. Anesthesiology. 1972; 36:617–621. PMID: 4113675.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr