Ann Surg Treat Res.  2014 Jan;86(1):39-44. 10.4174/astr.2014.86.1.39.

Risk factor analysis of new brain lesions associated with carotid endarterectmy

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. iami1124@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the standard treatment for carotid artery stenosis. New brain ischemia is a major concern associated with CEA and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is a good imaging modality for detecting early ischemic brain lesions. We aimed to investigate the surgical complications and identify the potential risk factors for the incidence of new brain lesions (NBL) on DWI after CEA.
METHODS
From January 2006 to November 2011, 94 patients who had been studied by magnetic resonance imaging including DWI within 1 week after CEA were included in this study. Data were retrospectively investigated by review of vascular registry protocol. Seven clinical variables and three procedural variables were analyzed as risk factors for NBL after CEA.
RESULTS
The incidence of periprocedural NBL on DWI was 27.7%. There were no fatal complications, such as ipsilateral disabling stroke, myocardial infarction or mortality. A significantly higher incidence of NBL was found in ulcer positive patients as opposed to ulcer negative patients (P = 0.029). The incidence of NBL after operation was significantly higher in patients treated with conventional technique than with eversion technique (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSION
Our data shows CEA has acceptable periprocedural complication rates and the existence of ulcerative plaque and conventional technique of endarterectomy are high risk factors for NBL development after CEA.

Keyword

Catorid endarterectomy; Complications; New brain lesions; Risk factors

MeSH Terms

Brain Ischemia
Brain*
Carotid Stenosis
Diffusion
Endarterectomy
Endarterectomy, Carotid
Humans
Incidence
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mortality
Myocardial Infarction
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors*
Stroke
Ulcer

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Conventional carotid endarterectomy with shunt (A) and eversion carotid endarterectomy (B).

  • Fig. 2 New brain lesions on magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging after carotid endarterectomy.


Reference

1. Petty GW, Brown RD Jr, Whisnant JP, Sicks JD, O'Fallon WM, Wiebers DO. Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors. Stroke. 1999; 30:2513–2516.
2. Lanzino G, Rabinstein AA, Brown RD Jr. Treatment of carotid artery stenosis: medical therapy, surgery, or stenting? Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84:362–387.
3. Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 1998; 29:554–562.
4. Furie KL, Kasner SE, Adams RJ, Albers GW, Bush RL, Fagan SC, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. 2011; 42:227–276.
5. Kastrup A, Nagele T, Groschel K, Schmidt F, Vogler E, Schulz J, et al. Incidence of new brain lesions after carotid stenting with and without cerebral protection. Stroke. 2006; 37:2312–2316.
6. Rosenthal D, Zeichner WD, Lamis PA, Stanton PE Jr. Neurologic deficit after carotid endarterectomy: pathogenesis and management. Surgery. 1983; 94:776–780.
7. van Everdingen KJ, van der Grond J, Kappelle LJ, Ramos LM, Mali WP. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in acute stroke. Stroke. 1998; 29:1783–1790.
8. Bendszus M, Stoll G. Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures. Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5:364–372.
9. Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S, Flach HZ, Dobson J, Nederkoorn PJ, et al. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS). Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9:353–362.
10. Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348:1215–1222.
11. Schnaudigel S, Groschel K, Pilgram SM, Kastrup A. New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2008; 39:1911–1919.
12. Hebb MO, Heiserman JE, Forbes KP, Zabramski JM, Spetzler RF. Perioperative ischemic complications of the brain after carotid endarterectomy. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67:286–293.
13. Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, Clagett GP, Barnes RW, Wallace MC, et al. The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: surgical results in 1415 patients. Stroke. 1999; 30:1751–1758.
14. Lee KB, Lee KH, Chung CS, Kim GM, Byun HS, Jeon P, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: analysis of early complications (<30 days) and risk factors for postoperative new brain infarction. J Korean Surg Soc. 2009; 77:195–201.
15. Bond R, Narayan SK, Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European carotid surgery trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002; 23:108–116.
16. Halm EA, Tuhrim S, Wang JJ, Rockman C, Riles TS, Chassin MR. Risk factors for perioperative death and stroke after carotid endarterectomy: results of the New York carotid artery surgery study. Stroke. 2009; 40:221–229.
17. Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, Sergentanis TN, Liapis CD. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011; 42:751–765.
18. Parsons MW, Yang Q, Barber PA, Darby DG, Desmond PM, Gerraty RP, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging maps in hyperacute stroke: relative cerebral blood flow most accurately identifies tissue destined to infarct. Stroke. 2001; 32:1581–1587.
19. Motomiya M, Karino T. Flow patterns in the human carotid artery bifurcation. Stroke. 1984; 15:50–56.
20. Liapis CD, Bell PR, Mikhailidis D, Sivenius J, Nicolaides A, Fernandes e Fernandes J, et al. ESVS guidelines. Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009; 37:4 Suppl. 1–19.
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr