Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2011 Nov;15(4):231-236. 10.14701/kjhbps.2011.15.4.231.

Effectiveness of external drainage of the bile duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single surgeon's experience

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khkim620@amc.seoul.kr
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
The rates of surgery-related complications during and after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remain very high, reaching up to 41%. They were primarily caused by leakage of pancreatic juice. We evaluated the effectiveness of external drainage of the bile duct using a pigtail drain to prevent pancreatic leakage in patients undergoing PD.
METHODS
We evaluated 79 patients who underwent PD using a single-layer continuous suture between the pancreatic parenchyma and jejunum after duct-to-mucosa anastomosis by a single surgeon from April 2005 to December 2008. Of the 79, 44 underwent external drainage (ED) of the bile duct using a pigtail drain, performed in the intraoperative field via a retrograde transhepatic approach, whereas 35 did not undergo ED.
RESULTS
Age, sex distribution, number of total complications, pancreatic duct size, pancreatic texture and duration of hospital stay did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo ED. In groups with or without ED, 0 and 4 patients, respectively, showed leakage of pancreatic juice and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
The fact that none of the patients who underwent external drainage experienced pancreatic leakage, suggests that external drainage of the bile duct with a pigtail drain to decompress the jejunum and to drain pancreatic and bile juice is useful in preventing the complications of pancreatic leakage.

Keyword

Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreaticojejunostomy; Leakage

MeSH Terms

Bile
Bile Ducts
Drainage
Humans
Jejunum
Length of Stay
Pancreatic Ducts
Pancreatic Juice
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Pancreaticojejunostomy
Sex Distribution
Sutures

Figure

  • Fig. 1 External drainage of the bile duct with a pigtail drain.


Reference

1. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997; 226:248–257. PMID: 9339931.
2. Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR. Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg. 1935; 102:763–779. PMID: 17856666.
3. Fernández-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL. Standards for pancreatic resection in the 1990s. Arch Surg. 1995; 130:295–299. PMID: 7887797.
Article
4. Lieberman MD, Kilburn H, Lindsey M, Brennan MF. Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. Ann Surg. 1995; 222:638–645. PMID: 7487211.
Article
5. Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc portal vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma with suspected portal vein involvement. World J Surg. 2004; 28:602–608. PMID: 15366753.
Article
6. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA, Nagorney DM, McIlrath DC, Ilstrup D. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Current management. Arch Surg. 1992; 127:945–949. PMID: 1353671.
7. Poon RT, Fan ST, Chu KM, Poon JT, Wong J. Standards of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong: retrospective case series. Hong Kong Med J. 2002; 8:249–254. PMID: 12167728.
8. Eyre-Brook IA. Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. Br J Surg. 1998; 85:425. PMID: 9529513.
Article
9. Böttger TC, Junginger T. Factors influencing morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy: critical analysis of 221 resections. World J Surg. 1999; 23:164–171. PMID: 9880426.
Article
10. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J. One hundred and forty-five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg. 1993; 217:430–435. PMID: 8098202.
Article
11. Jimenez RE, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Rattner DW, Chang Y, Warshaw AL. Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2000; 231:293–300. PMID: 10714621.
Article
12. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ. Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology. 1997; 113:983–994. PMID: 9287993.
Article
13. Trede M, Schwall G. The complications of pancreatectomy. Ann Surg. 1988; 207:39–47. PMID: 3276272.
Article
14. Cullen JJ, Sarr MG, Ilstrup DM. Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management. Am J Surg. 1994; 168:295–298. PMID: 7524375.
Article
15. Kim KH, Lee HJ, Lee YJ, et al. Effect of a single layer continuous suture between pancreatic parenchyma and jejunum after duct-to-mucosa anastomosis in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single surgeon's experiences. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007; 54:1368–1372. PMID: 17708256.
16. Crile G Jr. The advantages of bypass operations over radical pancreatoduodenectomy in the treatment of pancreatic carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970; 130:1049–1053. PMID: 4192028.
17. Shapiro TM. Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a statistical analysis of biliary bypass vs Whipple resection in good risk patients. Ann Surg. 1975; 182:715–721. PMID: 1190874.
18. Herter FP, Cooperman AM, Ahlborn TN, Antinori C. Surgical experience with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Ann Surg. 1982; 195:274–281. PMID: 6277259.
Article
19. Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg. 1990; 211:447–458. PMID: 2322039.
20. Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, et al. Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:786–795. PMID: 11088073.
Article
21. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995; 222:580–580. PMID: 7574936.
Article
22. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, et al. Does prophylactic octreotide decrease the rates of pancreatic fistula and other complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2000; 232:419–429. PMID: 10973392.
23. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998; 133:1094–1098. PMID: 9790207.
Article
24. Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res. 1991; 11:1831–1848. PMID: 1685076.
25. van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185:18–24. PMID: 9208956.
Article
26. Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH. Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995; 221:635–645. PMID: 7794068.
Article
27. Hamanaka Y, Nishihara K, Hamasaki T, et al. Pancreatic juice output after pancreatoduodenectomy in relation to pancreatic consistency, duct size, and leakage. Surgery. 1996; 119:281–287. PMID: 8619183.
Article
28. Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Concomitant benefit of preoperative irradiation in preventing pancreas fistula formation after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 1991; 126:885–889. PMID: 1854249.
Article
29. Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y, Nishimura S, Koizumi S. A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today. 1998; 28:719–726. PMID: 9697265.
Article
30. Yeh TS, Jan YY, Jeng LB, et al. Pancreaticojejunal anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy--multivariate analysis of perioperative risk factors. J Surg Res. 1997; 67:119–125. PMID: 9073557.
Article
31. Shyr YM, Su CH, Wu CW, Lui WY. Does drainage fluid amylase reflect pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg. 2003; 27:606–610. PMID: 12715232.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr