J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2016 May;57(5):794-799. 10.3341/jkos.2016.57.5.794.

The Path to Glaucoma Diagnosis

• Lee KB
• Kim MK
• Kim MJ
• Ahn SI
• Hwang YH

• KMID: 2212723
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2016.57.5.794

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate the events leading to a diagnosis of glaucoma.
METHODS
Medical records of 484 subjects (223 women, 261 men; mean age, 55.3 years) who visited a glaucoma clinic without previous glaucoma diagnosis were reviewed. Events were classified into: 1) glaucoma-related symptoms, such as ocular pain accompanied by intraocular pressure elevation or visual disturbance without other ocular abnormalities except glaucoma, 2) ocular examination by an ophthalmologist for other symptoms, 3) routine health examination, or 4) patient request due to family history of glaucoma. Ocular findings that suggested glaucoma and led to detailed glaucoma assessment were classified as: 1) an optic disc abnormality, 2) high intraocular pressure, or 3) both.
RESULTS
Events that led to the diagnosis of glaucoma were glaucoma-related symptoms in 11.8%, examination by an ophthalmologist in 74.2%, routine health examination in 12.4%, and family history in 1.7% of subjects. Findings that suggested glaucoma in ocular and routine health examinations were an optic disc abnormality in 84.2% and high intraocular pressure in 15.8%; both of these findings were found in 7.4% of subjects.
CONCLUSIONS
The most common path to glaucoma diagnosis was optic disc assessment by an ophthalmologist and routine health examination. To facilitate early detection of glaucoma, regular detailed optic disc evaluation by an ophthalmologist should be emphasized.

Keyword

Diagnosis; Glaucoma; Visual field

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis*
Female
Glaucoma*
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Male
Medical Records
Visual Fields

Reference

References

1. Quigley HA. Jampel HD. How are glaucoma patients identified? J Glaucoma. 2003; 12:451–5.

2. MacKean JM. Elkington AR. Referral routes to hospital of patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 285:1093–5.

3. Kwak HW. Joo MJ. Yoo JH. The significance of fundus photography without mydriasis during health mass screening. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 38:1585–9.

4. Chung YS. Kim JM. Sohn YH. Diagnostic outcomes of patients suspicious for glaucoma referred from the company health screening. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1444–8.

5. Park KH. Lee SY. Hong YJ. Outpatient distribution for glaucoma evaluation. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2015; 56:388–95.

6. Kim CS. Seong GJ. Lee NH, et al. Prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in central South Korea the Namil study. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:1024–30.

7. Boodhna T. Crabb DP. Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015; 35:225–30.